42 research outputs found

    Altimetry for the future: Building on 25 years of progress

    Get PDF
    In 2018 we celebrated 25 years of development of radar altimetry, and the progress achieved by this methodology in the fields of global and coastal oceanography, hydrology, geodesy and cryospheric sciences. Many symbolic major events have celebrated these developments, e.g., in Venice, Italy, the 15th (2006) and 20th (2012) years of progress and more recently, in 2018, in Ponta Delgada, Portugal, 25 Years of Progress in Radar Altimetry. On this latter occasion it was decided to collect contributions of scientists, engineers and managers involved in the worldwide altimetry community to depict the state of altimetry and propose recommendations for the altimetry of the future. This paper summarizes contributions and recommendations that were collected and provides guidance for future mission design, research activities, and sustainable operational radar altimetry data exploitation. Recommendations provided are fundamental for optimizing further scientific and operational advances of oceanographic observations by altimetry, including requirements for spatial and temporal resolution of altimetric measurements, their accuracy and continuity. There are also new challenges and new openings mentioned in the paper that are particularly crucial for observations at higher latitudes, for coastal oceanography, for cryospheric studies and for hydrology. The paper starts with a general introduction followed by a section on Earth System Science including Ocean Dynamics, Sea Level, the Coastal Ocean, Hydrology, the Cryosphere and Polar Oceans and the ‘‘Green” Ocean, extending the frontier from biogeochemistry to marine ecology. Applications are described in a subsequent section, which covers Operational Oceanography, Weather, Hurricane Wave and Wind Forecasting, Climate projection. Instruments’ development and satellite missions’ evolutions are described in a fourth section. A fifth section covers the key observations that altimeters provide and their potential complements, from other Earth observation measurements to in situ data. Section 6 identifies the data and methods and provides some accuracy and resolution requirements for the wet tropospheric correction, the orbit and other geodetic requirements, the Mean Sea Surface, Geoid and Mean Dynamic Topography, Calibration and Validation, data accuracy, data access and handling (including the DUACS system). Section 7 brings a transversal view on scales, integration, artificial intelligence, and capacity building (education and training). Section 8 reviews the programmatic issues followed by a conclusion

    Altimetry for the future: building on 25 years of progress

    Get PDF
    In 2018 we celebrated 25 years of development of radar altimetry, and the progress achieved by this methodology in the fields of global and coastal oceanography, hydrology, geodesy and cryospheric sciences. Many symbolic major events have celebrated these developments, e.g., in Venice, Italy, the 15th (2006) and 20th (2012) years of progress and more recently, in 2018, in Ponta Delgada, Portugal, 25 Years of Progress in Radar Altimetry. On this latter occasion it was decided to collect contributions of scientists, engineers and managers involved in the worldwide altimetry community to depict the state of altimetry and propose recommendations for the altimetry of the future. This paper summarizes contributions and recommendations that were collected and provides guidance for future mission design, research activities, and sustainable operational radar altimetry data exploitation. Recommendations provided are fundamental for optimizing further scientific and operational advances of oceanographic observations by altimetry, including requirements for spatial and temporal resolution of altimetric measurements, their accuracy and continuity. There are also new challenges and new openings mentioned in the paper that are particularly crucial for observations at higher latitudes, for coastal oceanography, for cryospheric studies and for hydrology. The paper starts with a general introduction followed by a section on Earth System Science including Ocean Dynamics, Sea Level, the Coastal Ocean, Hydrology, the Cryosphere and Polar Oceans and the “Green” Ocean, extending the frontier from biogeochemistry to marine ecology. Applications are described in a subsequent section, which covers Operational Oceanography, Weather, Hurricane Wave and Wind Forecasting, Climate projection. Instruments’ development and satellite missions’ evolutions are described in a fourth section. A fifth section covers the key observations that altimeters provide and their potential complements, from other Earth observation measurements to in situ data. Section 6 identifies the data and methods and provides some accuracy and resolution requirements for the wet tropospheric correction, the orbit and other geodetic requirements, the Mean Sea Surface, Geoid and Mean Dynamic Topography, Calibration and Validation, data accuracy, data access and handling (including the DUACS system). Section 7 brings a transversal view on scales, integration, artificial intelligence, and capacity building (education and training). Section 8 reviews the programmatic issues followed by a conclusion

    Measurement of the Branching Fraction of B0J/ψπ0B^{0} \rightarrow J/\psi \pi^{0} Decays

    No full text
    International audienceThe ratio of branching fractions between B0J/ψπ0B^{0} \rightarrow J/\psi \pi^{0} and B+J/ψK+B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{*+} decays is measured with proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb1^{-1}. The measured value is BB0J/ψπ0BB+J/ψK+=(1.153±0.053±0.048)×102\frac{\mathcal{B}_{B^{0} \rightarrow J/\psi \pi^{0}}}{\mathcal{B}_{B^{+} \rightarrow J/\psi K^{*+}}} = (1.153 \pm 0.053 \pm 0.048 ) \times 10^{-2}, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. The branching fraction for B0J/ψπ0B^{0} \rightarrow J/\psi \pi^{0} decays is determined using the branching fraction of the normalisation channel, resulting in BB0J/ψπ0=(1.670±0.077±0.069±0.095)×105\mathcal{B}_{B^{0} \rightarrow J/\psi \pi^{0}} = (1.670 \pm 0.077 \pm 0.069 \pm 0.095) \times 10^{-5}, where the last uncertainty corresponds to that of the external input. This result is consistent with the current world average value and competitive with the most precise single measurement to date

    A measurement of ΔΓs\Delta \Gamma_{s}

    No full text
    Using a dataset corresponding to 9 fb1^{−1} of integrated luminosity collected with the LHCb detector between 2011 and 2018 in proton-proton collisions, the decay-time distributions of the decay modes Bs0J/ψη {B}_s^0\to J/{\psi \eta}^{\prime } and Bs0J/ψπ+π {B}_s^0\to J/\psi {\pi}^{+}{\pi}^{-} are studied. The decay-width difference between the light and heavy mass eigenstates of the Bs0 {B}_s^0 meson is measured to be ∆Γs_{s} = 0.087 ± 0.012 ± 0.009 ps1^{−1}, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic.[graphic not available: see fulltext]Using a dataset corresponding to 9 fb19~\mathrm{fb}^{-1} of integrated luminosity collected with the LHCb detector between 2011 and 2018 in proton-proton collisions, the decay-time distributions of the decay modes Bs0J/ψηB_s^0 \rightarrow J/\psi \eta' and Bs0J/ψπ+πB_s^0 \rightarrow J/\psi \pi^{+} \pi^{-} are studied. The decay-width difference between the light and heavy mass eigenstates of the Bs0B_s^0 meson is measured to be ΔΓs=0.087±0.012±0.009ps1\Delta \Gamma_s = 0.087 \pm 0.012 \pm 0.009 \, \mathrm{ps}^{-1}, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic

    Observation of Ξb0Ξc+Ds\Xi_b^0 \rightarrow \Xi_c^+ D_s^- and ΞbΞc0Ds\Xi_b^- \rightarrow \Xi_c^0 D_s^- decays

    No full text
    International audienceThe Ξb0Ξc+Ds\Xi_b^0 \rightarrow \Xi_c^+ D_s^- and ΞbΞc0Ds\Xi_b^- \rightarrow \Xi_c^0 D_s^- decays are observed for the first time using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of s=13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\mathrm{TeV}, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.1fb15.1\mathrm{fb}^{-1}. The relative branching fractions times the beauty-baryon production cross-sections are measured to be \begin{align*} \mathcal{R}\left(\frac{\Xi_b^0}{\Lambda_b^0}\right) \equiv \frac{\sigma\left(\Xi_b^0\right)}{\sigma\left(\Lambda_b^0\right)} \times \frac{\mathcal{B}\left(\Xi_b^0 \rightarrow \Xi_c^+ D_s^-\right)}{\mathcal{B}\left(\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow \Lambda_c^0 D_s^-\right)} =(15.8\pm1.1\pm0.6\pm7.7)\%, \mathcal{R}\left(\frac{\Xi_b^-}{\Lambda_b^0}\right) \equiv \frac{\sigma\left(\Xi_b^-\right)}{\sigma\left(\Lambda_b^0\right)} \times \frac{\mathcal{B}\left(\Xi_b^- \rightarrow \Xi_c^0 D_s^-\right)}{\mathcal{B}\left(\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow \Lambda_c^0 D_s^-\right)} =(16.9\pm1.3\pm0.9\pm4.3)\%, \end{align*} where the first uncertainties are statistical, the second systematic, and the third due to the uncertainties on the branching fractions of relevant charm-baryon decays. The masses of Ξb0\Xi_b^0 and Ξb\Xi_b^- baryons are measured to be mΞb0=5791.12±0.60±0.45±0.24MeV/c2m_{\Xi_b^0}=5791.12\pm0.60\pm0.45\pm0.24\mathrm{MeV}/c^2 and mΞb=5797.02±0.63±0.49±0.29MeV/c2m_{\Xi_b^-}=5797.02\pm0.63\pm0.49\pm0.29\mathrm{MeV}/c^2, where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and those due to charm-hadron masses, respectively

    Observation of Ξb0Ξc+Ds\Xi_b^0 \rightarrow \Xi_c^+ D_s^- and ΞbΞc0Ds\Xi_b^- \rightarrow \Xi_c^0 D_s^- decays

    No full text
    International audienceThe Ξb0Ξc+Ds\Xi_b^0 \rightarrow \Xi_c^+ D_s^- and ΞbΞc0Ds\Xi_b^- \rightarrow \Xi_c^0 D_s^- decays are observed for the first time using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of s=13TeV\sqrt{s}=13\mathrm{TeV}, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.1fb15.1\mathrm{fb}^{-1}. The relative branching fractions times the beauty-baryon production cross-sections are measured to be \begin{align*} \mathcal{R}\left(\frac{\Xi_b^0}{\Lambda_b^0}\right) \equiv \frac{\sigma\left(\Xi_b^0\right)}{\sigma\left(\Lambda_b^0\right)} \times \frac{\mathcal{B}\left(\Xi_b^0 \rightarrow \Xi_c^+ D_s^-\right)}{\mathcal{B}\left(\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow \Lambda_c^0 D_s^-\right)} =(15.8\pm1.1\pm0.6\pm7.7)\%, \mathcal{R}\left(\frac{\Xi_b^-}{\Lambda_b^0}\right) \equiv \frac{\sigma\left(\Xi_b^-\right)}{\sigma\left(\Lambda_b^0\right)} \times \frac{\mathcal{B}\left(\Xi_b^- \rightarrow \Xi_c^0 D_s^-\right)}{\mathcal{B}\left(\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow \Lambda_c^0 D_s^-\right)} =(16.9\pm1.3\pm0.9\pm4.3)\%, \end{align*} where the first uncertainties are statistical, the second systematic, and the third due to the uncertainties on the branching fractions of relevant charm-baryon decays. The masses of Ξb0\Xi_b^0 and Ξb\Xi_b^- baryons are measured to be mΞb0=5791.12±0.60±0.45±0.24MeV/c2m_{\Xi_b^0}=5791.12\pm0.60\pm0.45\pm0.24\mathrm{MeV}/c^2 and mΞb=5797.02±0.63±0.49±0.29MeV/c2m_{\Xi_b^-}=5797.02\pm0.63\pm0.49\pm0.29\mathrm{MeV}/c^2, where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and those due to charm-hadron masses, respectively
    corecore