Diferencias relacionadas con el sexo en pacientes con IAMCEST: análisis por puntuación de propensión

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version available at https://doi.org/ 10.24875/RECICE.M19000061.[EN] Introduction and objectives: Female sex is believed to be a significant risk factor for mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions (pPCI). Methods: We collected data on all consecutive STEMI patients treated with pPCI within 12 hours and compared the males vs the females. The primary endpoint was long-term mortality one month after hospital discharge. The secondary endpoint was 30-days mortality. Results: From March 2006 to December 2016, 1981 patients underwent pPCI at our hospital, 484 (24.4%) were females. Compared with men, women were older (mean age 71.3 ± 11.6 vs 62.9 ± 11.8 years, P < .001), less smokers (26.7% vs 72.7%; P < .001), more diabetic (28.0% vs 22.3%; P < .002), more hypertensive (69.6% vs 61.3%; P < .001), presented more often with shock at baseline (13.2% vs 9.0%; P = .006), had longer symptoms-to-balloon time frames (5.36 ± 3.97 vs 4.47 ± 3.67 hours; P < .001). Also, women were less likely to receive glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors (59.5% vs 71.4%; P < .001) and stents (79.5% vs 86.6%; P = .01). During the 30-day and long-term follow-up (mean 4.9 ± 3.2 years) the female sex was associated with a higher mortality rate (8.9% vs 4.0%, P < .001 and 23.8% vs 18.4%, P = .01, respectively). After propensity score matching, 379 men and 379 women were selected. Female sex continued to be associated with a higher death rate at 30 days (9.5% vs 5.5%; P = .039) but not in the long term among survivors (25.6% vs 21.4%; P = .170). Conclusions: Compared to men, women with STEMI undergoing pPCI had higher 30-day mortality rates. However, among survivors, the long-term mortality rate was similar. Even if residual confounding cannot be ruled out, this difference in the outcomes may be partially explained by biological sex-related differences.[ES]Introducción y objetivos: El sexo femenino se considera un importante factor de riesgo de mortalidad en el infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (IAMCEST) tratado con intervención coronaria percutánea primaria (ICPp). Métodos: Se analizó a todos los pacientes consecutivos con IAMCEST tratados con ICPp dentro de las primeras 12 horas, y se compararon varones y mujeres. El objetivo principal fue la mortalidad a largo plazo en los supervivientes después del primer mes del alta, y el objetivo secundario fue la mortalidad a los 30 días. Resultados: Desde marzo de 2006 hasta diciembre de 2016 se trató con ICPp 1.981 a pacientes, de los cuales 484 (24,4%) eran mujeres. En comparación con los varones, las mujeres tenían mayor edad (edad media 71,3 ± 11,6 frente a 62,9 ± 11,8 años, p < 0,001) y la frecuencia de fumadoras era más baja (26,7 frente a 72,7%; p < 0,001), mientras que era más alta la frecuencia de diabetes (28,0 frente a 22,3%; p < 0,002), hipertensión arterial (69.6 frente a 61,3%, p < 0,001) y shock al ingreso (13,2 frente a 9,0%; p = 0,006), y más largo el tiempo desde el comienzo de los síntomas hasta la intervención con balón (5,36 ± 3,97 frente a 4,47 ± 3,67 horas; p < 0,001). Además, la frecuencia de tratamiento con inhibidores de la glucoproteína IIb-IIIa (59,5 frente a 71,4%; p < 0,001) y stent (79,5 frente a 86,6%, p = 0,01) fue inferior. Tanto a los 30 días como a largo plazo (media 4,9 ± 3,2 años), el sexo femenino se asoció con una mortalidad más alta (8,9 frente a 4,0%, p < 0,001, y 23,8 frente a 18,4%, p = 0,01, respectivamente). Se seleccionaron 379 mujeres y 379 varones emparejados por puntuación de propensión. Se mantuvo la asociación entre sexo femenino y mayor mortalidad a los 30 días (9,5 frente a 5,5%; p = 0,039), pero no a largo plazo (25,6 frente a 21,4%; p = 0,170). Conclusiones: En comparación con los varones, las mujeres con IAMCEST tratadas con ICPp tuvieron mayor mortalidad a los 30 días. Sin embargo, entre los supervivientes, la mortalidad a largo plazo fue similar. Aunque no puede descartarse el efecto de variables residuales de confusión, las diferencias en el pronóstico podrían explicarse en parte por diferencias biológicas relacionadas con el sexo.S

Burnout among surgeons before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an international survey

Background: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had many significant impacts within the surgical realm, and surgeons have been obligated to reconsider almost every aspect of daily clinical practice. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study reported in compliance with the CHERRIES guidelines and conducted through an online platform from June 14th to July 15th, 2020. The primary outcome was the burden of burnout during the pandemic indicated by the validated Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure. Results: Nine hundred fifty-four surgeons completed the survey. The median length of practice was 10&nbsp;years; 78.2% included were male with a median age of 37&nbsp;years old, 39.5% were consultants, 68.9% were general surgeons, and 55.7% were affiliated with an academic institution. Overall, there was a significant increase in the mean burnout score during the pandemic; longer years of practice and older age were significantly associated with less burnout. There were significant reductions in the median number of outpatient visits, operated cases, on-call hours, emergency visits, and research work, so, 48.2% of respondents felt that the training resources were insufficient. The majority (81.3%) of respondents reported that their hospitals were included in the management of COVID-19, 66.5% felt their roles had been minimized; 41% were asked to assist in non-surgical medical practices, and 37.6% of respondents were included in COVID-19 management. Conclusions: There was a significant burnout among trainees. Almost all aspects of clinical and research activities were affected with a significant reduction in the volume of research, outpatient clinic visits, surgical procedures, on-call hours, and emergency cases hindering the training. Trial registration: The study was registered on clicaltrials.gov "NCT04433286" on 16/06/2020

Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries

Background: Surgical mortality data are collected routinely in high-income countries, yet virtually no low- or middle-income countries have outcome surveillance in place. The aim was prospectively to collect worldwide mortality data following emergency abdominal surgery, comparing findings across countries with a low, middle or high Human Development Index (HDI). Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Self-selected hospitals performing emergency surgery submitted prespecified data for consecutive patients from at least one 2-week interval during July to December 2014. Postoperative mortality was analysed by hierarchical multivariable logistic regression. Results: Data were obtained for 10 745 patients from 357 centres in 58 countries; 6538 were from high-, 2889 from middle- and 1318 from low-HDI settings. The overall mortality rate was 1⋅6 per cent at 24 h (high 1⋅1 per cent, middle 1⋅9 per cent, low 3⋅4 per cent; P < 0⋅001), increasing to 5⋅4 per cent by 30 days (high 4⋅5 per cent, middle 6⋅0 per cent, low 8⋅6 per cent; P < 0⋅001). Of the 578 patients who died, 404 (69⋅9 per cent) did so between 24 h and 30 days following surgery (high 74⋅2 per cent, middle 68⋅8 per cent, low 60⋅5 per cent). After adjustment, 30-day mortality remained higher in middle-income (odds ratio (OR) 2⋅78, 95 per cent c.i. 1⋅84 to 4⋅20) and low-income (OR 2⋅97, 1⋅84 to 4⋅81) countries. Surgical safety checklist use was less frequent in low- and middle-income countries, but when used was associated with reduced mortality at 30 days. Conclusion: Mortality is three times higher in low- compared with high-HDI countries even when adjusted for prognostic factors. Patient safety factors may have an important role. Registration number: NCT02179112 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)

Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study

Background: Clinical outcomes after major surgery are poorly described at the national level. Evidence of heterogeneity between hospitals and health-care systems suggests potential to improve care for patients but this potential remains unconfirmed. The European Surgical Outcomes Study was an international study designed to assess outcomes after non-cardiac surgery in Europe.Methods: We did this 7 day cohort study between April 4 and April 11, 2011. We collected data describing consecutive patients aged 16 years and older undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery in 498 hospitals across 28 European nations. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 60 days. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures were duration of hospital stay and admission to critical care. We used χ² and Fisher’s exact tests to compare categorical variables and the t test or the Mann-Whitney U test to compare continuous variables. Significance was set at p&lt;0·05. We constructed multilevel logistic regression models to adjust for the differences in mortality rates between countries.Findings: We included 46 539 patients, of whom 1855 (4%) died before hospital discharge. 3599 (8%) patients were admitted to critical care after surgery with a median length of stay of 1·2 days (IQR 0·9–3·6). 1358 (73%) patients who died were not admitted to critical care at any stage after surgery. Crude mortality rates varied widely between countries (from 1·2% [95% CI 0·0–3·0] for Iceland to 21·5% [16·9–26·2] for Latvia). After adjustment for confounding variables, important differences remained between countries when compared with the UK, the country with the largest dataset (OR range from 0·44 [95% CI 0·19 1·05; p=0·06] for Finland to 6·92 [2·37–20·27; p=0·0004] for Poland).Interpretation: The mortality rate for patients undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery was higher than anticipated. Variations in mortality between countries suggest the need for national and international strategies to improve care for this group of patients.Funding: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, European Society of Anaesthesiology

Global economic burden of unmet surgical need for appendicitis

Background There is a substantial gap in provision of adequate surgical care in many low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to identify the economic burden of unmet surgical need for the common condition of appendicitis. Methods Data on the incidence of appendicitis from 170 countries and two different approaches were used to estimate numbers of patients who do not receive surgery: as a fixed proportion of the total unmet surgical need per country (approach 1); and based on country income status (approach 2). Indirect costs with current levels of access and local quality, and those if quality were at the standards of high-income countries, were estimated. A human capital approach was applied, focusing on the economic burden resulting from premature death and absenteeism. Results Excess mortality was 4185 per 100 000 cases of appendicitis using approach 1 and 3448 per 100 000 using approach 2. The economic burden of continuing current levels of access and local quality was US $92 492 million using approach 1 and$73 141 million using approach 2. The economic burden of not providing surgical care to the standards of high-income countries was $95 004 million using approach 1 and$75 666 million using approach 2. The largest share of these costs resulted from premature death (97.7 per cent) and lack of access (97.0 per cent) in contrast to lack of quality. Conclusion For a comparatively non-complex emergency condition such as appendicitis, increasing access to care should be prioritized. Although improving quality of care should not be neglected, increasing provision of care at current standards could reduce societal costs substantially

Global economic burden of unmet surgical need for appendicitis

Background There is a substantial gap in provision of adequate surgical care in many low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to identify the economic burden of unmet surgical need for the common condition of appendicitis. Methods Data on the incidence of appendicitis from 170 countries and two different approaches were used to estimate numbers of patients who do not receive surgery: as a fixed proportion of the total unmet surgical need per country (approach 1); and based on country income status (approach 2). Indirect costs with current levels of access and local quality, and those if quality were at the standards of high-income countries, were estimated. A human capital approach was applied, focusing on the economic burden resulting from premature death and absenteeism. Results Excess mortality was 4185 per 100 000 cases of appendicitis using approach 1 and 3448 per 100 000 using approach 2. The economic burden of continuing current levels of access and local quality was US $92 492 million using approach 1 and$73 141 million using approach 2. The economic burden of not providing surgical care to the standards of high-income countries was $95 004 million using approach 1 and$75 666 million using approach 2. The largest share of these costs resulted from premature death (97.7 per cent) and lack of access (97.0 per cent) in contrast to lack of quality. Conclusion For a comparatively non-complex emergency condition such as appendicitis, increasing access to care should be prioritized. Although improving quality of care should not be neglected, increasing provision of care at current standards could reduce societal costs substantially