13 research outputs found

    Contributions of animal models to the study of mood disorders

    Full text link

    Forebrain-specific CRF overproduction during development is sufficient to induce enduring anxiety and startle abnormalities in adult mice

    Full text link
    Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) regulates physiological and behavioral responses to stress. Trauma in early life or adulthood is associated with increased CRF in the cerebrospinal fluid and heightened anxiety. Genetic variance in CRF receptors is linked to altered risk for stress disorders. Thus, both heritable differences and environmentally induced changes in CRF neurotransmission across the lifespan may modulate anxiety traits. To test the hypothesis that CRF hypersignaling is sufficient to modify anxiety-related phenotypes (avoidance, startle, and conditioned fear), we induced transient forebrain-specific overexpression of CRF (CRFOE) in mice (1) during development to model early-life stress, (2) in adulthood to model adult-onset stress, or (3) across the entire postnatal lifespan to model heritable increases in CRF signaling. The consequences of these manipulations on CRF peptide levels and behavioral responses were examined in adulthood. We found that transient CRFOE during development decreased startle habituation and prepulse inhibition, and increased avoidance (particularly in females) recapitulating the behavioral effects of lifetime CRFOE despite lower CRF peptide levels at testing. In contrast, CRFOE limited to adulthood reduced contextual fear learning in females and increased startle reactivity in males but did not change avoidance or startle plasticity. These findings suggest that forebrain CRFOE limited to development is sufficient to induce enduring alterations in startle plasticity and anxiety, while forebrain CRFOE during adulthood results in a different phenotype profile. These findings suggest that startle circuits are particularly sensitive to forebrain CRFOE, and that the impact of CRFOE may be dependent on the time of exposure

    Comparison of bedtime rest classification from accelerometer placed on waist or wrist in the development and validation groups with classification obtained using whole- room indirect calorimeter.

    No full text
    a<p>– Area under the ROC curve calculated as sensitivity multiplied by specificity before data was rounded;</p>b<p>- defined as the probability of correctly classifying bedtime rest period;</p>c<p>- defined as a probability of correctly classifying activity period;</p>d<p>- Wilcoxon signed rank test;</p>e<p>- automated computer algorithm;</p>f<p>- cut points were 20 counts/min (bedtime) and 500 counts/min (activity);</p>g<p>- cut points were 250 counts/min (bedtime) and 3000 counts/min (activity).</p
    corecore