3,818 research outputs found

    Medical students' preference for choice of clinical specialties: A multicentre survey in Nigeria

    Get PDF
    Background: The important goal of undergraduate medical training is to train doctors who would undergo further training to become specialists in various fields of clinical medicine. The admission into the specialty training programame depends largely on the pool of undergraduate medical students who have passed qualifications exams and are willing to choose and undergo training in a given clinical specialty. There are many factors considered by medical students when they make up their minds to choose a clinical specialty. This study seeks to determine the medical student preference for the clinical specialty and the factors that they consider in making such choice.Methods: This is a cross-sectional questionnaire based multicentre study in 3 accredited medical training institutions in Nigeria. Final year medical students who were willing to participate in the study filled out the questionnaires for fifteen minutes.  Information on their age, gender, specialty of preference and reason for choosing a particular clinical specialty were sought.Results: A total of 187 final year students took part in the study. Most of the students where in 21 – 30 year age range. Obstetrics and Gynaecology (24.9%), Surgery (18.9%), Internal medicine (14.1%) and Paediatics (8.1%), where the top clinical specialties preferred by the respondents. The less preferred specialties where Pathology  (2.7%), radiology (1.1%) ophthalmology (4.3%), ENT (0%). Personal liking  (51.9%), society perception (13.0%), financial reward (8.1%); where the most considered reasons for the choice of specialty.Conclusion:Medical students prefer to choose core-clinical specialty based on personal liking, financial reward and society perception.Keyword: Medical Students' Preference; Clinical Specialties; Nigeri

    Cross-sectional analysis of critical risk factors for PPP water projects in China

    Full text link
    © 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers. During the past decades in China, the traditional state monopoly has experienced difficulties in meeting the huge demand for new infrastructure and improvement in service levels, engendering the growth of different forms and degrees of private sector involvement. Since the 1990s, China has started experimenting with the public-private partnership (PPP) delivery method in the water supply sector. However, many problems stemming from unsuccessful risk management have been encountered in PPP applications that have eventually led to project failure. This paper aims to identify and evaluate typical risks associated with PPP projects in the Chinese water supply sector. A literature review, a Delphi survey, and face-to-face interviews were used to achieve these objectives. Finally, a register of 16 critical risk factors (CRFs) of water PPP projects in China was established. The findings revealed that completion risk, inflation, and price change risk have a higher impact on Chinese water PPP projects, whereas government corruption, an imperfect law and supervision system, and a change in market demand have a lower impact on the water supply sector. The findings can help project stakeholders to improve the efficiency of privatization in public utility service and provide private investors with a better understanding while they participate in the enormous Chinese water market through the PPP mode

    Bias and Controversy in Evaluation Systems

    Get PDF

    Summarizing Review Scores of "Unequal" Reviewers

    Get PDF
    A frequently encountered problem in decision making is the following review problem: review a large number of objects and select a small number of the best ones. An example is selecting conference papers from a large number of submissions. This problem involves two sub-problems: assigning reviewers to each object, and summarizing reviewers ’ scores into an overall score that supposedly reflects the quality of an object. In this paper, we address the score summarization sub-problem for the scenario where a small number of reviewers evaluate each object. Simply averaging the scores may not work as even a single reviewer could influence the average significantly. We recognize that reviewers are not necessarily on an equal ground and propose the notion of “leniency” to model this difference of reviewers. Two insights underpin our approach: (1) the “leniency ” of a reviewer depends on how s/he evaluates objects as well as on how other reviewers evaluate the same set of objects, (2) the “leniency” of a reviewer and the “quality ” of objects evaluated exhibit a mutual dependency relationship. These insights motivate us to develop a model that solves both “leniency ” and “quality” simultaneously. We study the effectiveness of this model on a real-life dataset

    Bias and Controversy: Beyond the Statistical Deviation

    Get PDF

    RecipeGPT: Generative pre-training based cooking recipe generation and evaluation system

    Get PDF
    National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore under International Research Centres in Singapore Funding Initiativ
    corecore