364 research outputs found

    Study of Stretched Configuration High-Spin States in the Nickel Region with the (d,α) Reaction

    Get PDF
    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant NSF PHY 78-22774 A02 & A03 and by Indiana Universit

    Shrinkage of the distal renal artery 1 year after stent placement as evidenced with serial intravascular ultrasound

    Get PDF
    The objective of this study was to determine the quantitative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and angiographic changes that occur during 1 year follow-up after renal artery stent placement, given that restenosis continues to be a limitation of renal artery stent placement. 38 consecutive patients with symptomatic renal artery stenosis treated with Palmaz stent placement were studied prospectively. IVUS and angiography were performed at the time of stent placement and at 1 year follow-up. At follow-up, angiographic restenosis was seen in 14% of patients. The lumen area in the stent, seen with IVUS, was significantly decreased from 24+/-5.6 mm(2) to 17+/-5.6 mm(2) (p<0.001) solely due to plaque accumulation. The distal main renal artery showed a significant decrease in lumen area owing to a significant vessel area decrease from 39+/-14.0 mm(2) to 29+/-9.3 mm(2) (p<0.001) without plaque accumulation. Angiographic analysis confirmed this reduction in luminal diameter and showed that the distal renal artery diameter at follow-up was significantly smaller than before stent placement (86+/-23.0% vs 104+/-23.9% of the contralateral renal artery diameter; p=0.003). Besides plaque accumulation in the stent, unexplained shrinkage of the distal main renal artery was evidenced with IVUS and angiography 1 year following stent placement

    Intravascular ultrasound evidence for coarctation causing symptomatic renal artery stenosis

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: A recent study of human cadaveric renal arteries revealed that renal artery narrowing could be due not only to atherosclerotic plaque compensated for by adaptive remodeling, but also to hitherto undescribed focal narrowing of an otherwise normal renal arterial wall (ie, coarctation). The present study investigated whether vessel coarctation could be identified in patients with symptomatic renal artery stenosis (RAS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive symptomatic patients with angiographically proven atherosclerotic RAS who were referred for stent placement were studied by 30-MHz intravascular ultrasound before intervention (n=18) or after predilatation (n=18). Analysis included assessment of the media-bounded area and plaque area (PLA) at the most stenotic site and at a distal reference site (most distal cross-section in the main renal artery with normal appearance). Coarctation was considered present whenever the target/reference media-bounded area was </=85%. Before intervention, coarctation was observed in 9 of 18 patients and adaptive remodeling in 9 of 18 patients. Coarctation lesions had a significantly smaller PLA than adaptive remodeled lesions (P=0.001). Similarly, despite predilatation, coarctation was seen in 8 of 18 patients who had significantly smaller PLAs (P=0. 008) when compared with those patients who had adaptive remodeled lesions. No differences in severity of RAS or angiographic or clinical parameters were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Low-plaque coarctation may cause a considerable proportion of symptomatic RAS, which is angiographically and clinically indistinguishable from plaque-rich RAS

    Face-to-face vs telephone pre-colonoscopy consultation in colorectal cancer screening; A randomised trial

    Get PDF
    Background: A pre-colonoscopy consultation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is necessary to assess a screenees general health status and to explain benefits and risks of screening. The first option allows for personal attention, whereas a telephone consultation does not require travelling. We hypothesised that a telephone consultation would lead to higher response and participation in CRC screening compared with a face-to-face consultation. Methods:A total of 6600 persons (50-75 years) were 1: 1 randomised for primary colonoscopy screening with a pre-colonoscopy consultation either face-to-face or by telephone. In both arms, we counted the number of invitees who attended a pre-colonoscopy consultation (response) and the number of those who subsequently attended colonoscopy (participation), relative to the number invited for screening. A questionnaire regarding satisfaction with the consultation and expected burden of the colonoscopy (scored on five-point rating scales) was sent to invitees. Besides, a questionnaire to assess the perceived burden of colonoscopy was sent to participants, 14 days after the procedure.Results:In all, 3302 invitees were allocated to the telephone group and 3298 to the face-to-face group, of which 794 (24%) attended a telephone consultation and 822 (25%) a face-to-face consultation (P=0.41). Subsequently, 674 (20%) participants in the telephone group and 752 (23%) in the face-to-face group attended colonoscopy (P=0.018). Invitees and responders in the telephone group expected the bowel preparation to be more painful than those in the face-to-face group while perceived burden scores for the full screening procedure were comparable. More subjects in the face-to-face group than in the telephone group were satisfied by the consultation in general: (99.8% vs 98.5%, P=0.014).Conclusion:Using a telephone rather than a face-to-face consultation in a population-based CRC colonoscopy screening progr

    Stent placement for renal arterial stenosis: where do we stand? A meta-analysis

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis of renal arterial stent placement in comparison with renal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with renal arterial stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies dealing with renal arterial stent placement (14 articles; 678 patients) and renal PTA (10 articles; 644 patients) published up to August 1998 were selected. A random-effects model was used to pool the data. RESULTS: Renal arterial stent placement proved highly successful, with an initial adequate performance in 98% and major complications in 11%. The overall cure rate for hypertension was 20%, whereas hypertension was improved in 49%. Renal function improved in 30% and stabilized in 38% of patients. The restenosis rate at follow-up of 6-29 months was 17%. Stent placement had a higher technical success rate and a lower restenosis rate than did renal PTA (98% vs 77% and 17% vs 26%, respectively; P <.001). The complication rate was not different between the two treatments. The cure rate for hypertension was higher and the improvement rate for renal function was lower after stent placement than after renal PTA (20% vs 10% and 30% vs 38%, respectively; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Renal arterial stent placement is technically superior and clinically comparable to renal PTA alone

    Graviton Resonances in E+ E- -> MU+ MU- at Linear Colliders with Beamstrahlung and ISR Effects

    Full text link
    Electromagnetic radiation emitted by the colliding beams is expected to play an important role at the next generation of high energy e^+ e^- linear collider(s). Focusing on the simplest process e+e- -> mu+ mu-, we show that radiative effects like initial state radiation (ISR) and beamstrahlung can lead to greatly-enhanced signals for resonant graviton modes of the Randall-Sundrum model.Comment: 20 pages Latex, 7 eps figure

    Burden of waiting for surveillance CT colonography in patients with screen-detected 6–9 mm polyps

    Get PDF
    Purpose: We assessed the burden of waiting for surveillance CT colonography (CTC) performed in patients having 6–9 mm colorectal polyps on primary screening CTC. Additionally, we compared the burden of primary and surveillance CTC. Materials and methods: In an invitational population-based CTC screening trial, 101 persons were diagnosed with <3 polyps 6–9 mm, for which surveillance CTC after 3 years was advised. Validated questionnaires regarding expected and perceived burden (5-point Likert scales) were completed before and after index and surveillance CTC, also including items on burden of waiting for surveillance CTC. McNemar’s test was used for comparison after dichotomization. Results: Seventy-eight (77 %) of 101 invitees underwent surveillance CTC, of which 66 (85 %) completed the expected and 62 (79 %) the perceived burden questionnaire. The majority of participants (73 %) reported the experience of waiting for surveillance CTC as ‘never’ or ‘only sometimes’ burdensome. There was almost no difference in expected and perceived burden between surveillance and index CTC. Waiting for the results after the procedure was significantly more burdensome for surveillance CTC than for index CTC (23 vs. 8 %; p = 0.012). Conclusion: Waiting for surveillance CTC after primary CTC screening caused little or no burden for surveillance participants. In general, the burden of surveillance and index CTC were comparable. Key points: • Waiting for surveillance CTC withi

    Computer tomography colonography participation and yield in patients under surveillance for 6-9 mm polyps in a population-based screening trial

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Surveillance CT colonography (CTC) is a viable option for 6-9 mm polyps at CTC screening for colorectal cancer. We established participation and diagnostic yield of surveillance and determined overall yield of CTC screening. Material and methods: In an invitational CTC screening trial 82 of 982 participants harboured 6-9 mm polyps as the largest lesion(s) for which surveillance CTC was advised. Only participants with one or more lesion(s) ≥6 mm at surveillance CTC were offered colonoscopy (OC); 13 had undergone preliminary OC. The surveillance CTC yield was defined as the number of participants with advanced neoplasia in the 82 surveillance participants, and was added to the primary screening yield. Results: Sixty-five of 82 participants were eligible for surveillance CTC of which 56 (86.2 %) participated. Advanced neoplasia was diagnosed in 15/56 participants (26.8 %) and 9/13 (69.2 %) with preliminary OC. Total surveillance yield was 24/82 (29.3 %). No carcinomas were detected. Adding surveillance results to initial screening CTC yield significantly increased the advanced neoplasia yield per 100 CTC participants (6.1 to 8.6; p < 0.001) and per 100 invitees (2.1 to 2.9; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Surveillance CTC for 6-9 mm polyps has a substantial yield of advanced adenomas and significantly increased the CTC yield in population screening. Key Points: • The participation rate in surveillance CT colonography (CTC) is 86 %. • Advanced adenoma prevalence in a 6-9 mm CTC surveillance population is high. • Surveillance CTC significantly increases the yield of population screening by CTC. • Surveillance CTC for 6-9 mm polyps is a safe strategy. • Sur

    Study protocol: Population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: A randomized controlled trial

    Get PDF
    Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent type of cancer in Europe. Early detection and removal of CRC or its precursor lesions by population screening can reduce mortality. Colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography (CT colonography) are highly accurate exams and screening options that examine the entire colon. The success of screening depends on the participation rate. We designed a randomized trial to compare the uptake, yield and costs of direct colonoscopy population screening, using either a telephone consultation or a consultation at the outpatient clinic, versus CT colonography first, with colonoscopy in CT colonography positives.Methods and design: 7,500 persons between 50 and 75 years will be randomly selected from the electronic database of the municipal administration registration and will receive an invitation to participate in either CT colonography (2,500 persons) or colonoscopy (5,000 persons) screening. Those invited for colonoscopy screening will be randomized to a prior consultation either by telephone or a visit at the outpatient clinic. All CT colonography invitees will have a prior consultation by telephone. Invitees are instructed to consult their general practitioner and not to participate in screening if they have symptoms suggestive for CRC. After provid
    • …
    corecore