13 research outputs found

    The Comparative Osteology of the Petrotympanic Complex (Ear Region) of Extant Baleen Whales (Cetacea: Mysticeti)

    Get PDF
    Anatomical comparisons of the ear region of baleen whales (Mysticeti) are provided through detailed osteological descriptions and high-resolution photographs of the petrotympanic complex (tympanic bulla and petrosal bone) of all extant species of mysticete cetaceans. Salient morphological features are illustrated and identified, including overall shape of the bulla, size of the conical process of the bulla, morphology of the promontorium, and the size and shape of the anterior process of the petrosal. We place our comparative osteological observations into a phylogenetic context in order to initiate an exploration into petrotympanic evolution within Mysticeti.The morphology of the petrotympanic complex is diagnostic for individual species of baleen whale (e.g., sigmoid and conical processes positioned at midline of bulla in Balaenoptera musculus; confluence of fenestra cochleae and perilymphatic foramen in Eschrichtius robustus), and several mysticete clades are united by derived characteristics. Balaenids and neobalaenids share derived features of the bulla, such as a rhomboid shape and a reduced anterior lobe (swelling) in ventral aspect, and eschrichtiids share derived morphologies of the petrosal with balaenopterids, including loss of a medial promontory groove and dorsomedial elongation of the promontorium. Monophyly of Balaenoidea (Balaenidae and Neobalaenidae) and Balaenopteroidea (Balaenopteridae and Eschrichtiidae) was recovered in phylogenetic analyses utilizing data exclusively from the petrotympanic complex.This study fills a major gap in our knowledge of the complex structures of the mysticete petrotympanic complex, which is an important anatomical region for the interpretation of the evolutionary history of mammals. In addition, we introduce a novel body of phylogenetically informative characters from the ear region of mysticetes. Our detailed anatomical descriptions, illustrations, and comparisons provide valuable data for current and future studies on the phylogenetic relationships, evolution, and auditory physiology of mysticetes and other cetaceans throughout Earth's history

    Expert range maps of global mammal distributions harmonised to three taxonomic authorities

    Get PDF
    AimComprehensive, global information on species' occurrences is an essential biodiversity variable and central to a range of applications in ecology, evolution, biogeography and conservation. Expert range maps often represent a species' only available distributional information and play an increasing role in conservation assessments and macroecology. We provide global range maps for the native ranges of all extant mammal species harmonised to the taxonomy of the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) mobilised from two sources, the Handbook of the Mammals of the World (HMW) and the Illustrated Checklist of the Mammals of the World (CMW).LocationGlobal.TaxonAll extant mammal species.MethodsRange maps were digitally interpreted, georeferenced, error-checked and subsequently taxonomically aligned between the HMW (6253 species), the CMW (6431 species) and the MDD taxonomies (6362 species).ResultsRange maps can be evaluated and visualised in an online map browser at Map of Life (mol.org) and accessed for individual or batch download for non-commercial use.Main conclusionExpert maps of species' global distributions are limited in their spatial detail and temporal specificity, but form a useful basis for broad-scale characterizations and model-based integration with other data. We provide georeferenced range maps for the native ranges of all extant mammal species as shapefiles, with species-level metadata and source information packaged together in geodatabase format. Across the three taxonomic sources our maps entail, there are 1784 taxonomic name differences compared to the maps currently available on the IUCN Red List website. The expert maps provided here are harmonised to the MDD taxonomic authority and linked to a community of online tools that will enable transparent future updates and version control

    What Happened to Gray Whales during the Pleistocene? The Ecological Impact of Sea-Level Change on Benthic Feeding Areas in the North Pacific Ocean

    Get PDF
    Gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) undertake long migrations, from Baja California to Alaska, to feed on seasonally productive benthos of the Bering and Chukchi seas. The invertebrates that form their primary prey are restricted to shallow water environments, but global sea-level changes during the Pleistocene eliminated or reduced this critical habitat multiple times. Because the fossil record of gray whales is coincident with the onset of Northern Hemisphere glaciation, gray whales survived these massive changes to their feeding habitat, but it is unclear how.We reconstructed gray whale carrying capacity fluctuations during the past 120,000 years by quantifying gray whale feeding habitat availability using bathymetric data for the North Pacific Ocean, constrained by their maximum diving depth. We calculated carrying capacity based on modern estimates of metabolic demand, prey availability, and feeding duration; we also constrained our estimates to reflect current population size and account for glaciated and non-glaciated areas in the North Pacific. Our results show that key feeding areas eliminated by sea-level lowstands were not replaced by commensurate areas. Our reconstructions show that such reductions affected carrying capacity, and harmonic means of these fluctuations do not differ dramatically from genetic estimates of carrying capacity.Assuming current carrying capacity estimates, Pleistocene glacial maxima may have created multiple, weak genetic bottlenecks, although the current temporal resolution of genetic datasets does not test for such signals. Our results do not, however, falsify molecular estimates of pre-whaling population size because those abundances would have been sufficient to survive the loss of major benthic feeding areas (i.e., the majority of the Bering Shelf) during glacial maxima. We propose that gray whales survived the disappearance of their primary feeding ground by employing generalist filter-feeding modes, similar to the resident gray whales found between northern Washington State and Vancouver Island

    Aetiocetus EMLONG 1966

    No full text
    <i>GENUS</i> <i>AETIOCETUS</i> EMLONG, 1966 <p> <i>Type species:</i> <i>Aetiocetus cotylalveus</i> Emlong, 1966</p> <p> <i>Distribution:</i> Late Oligocene of Oregon and Japan</p> <p> <i>Included species:</i> <i>Aetiocetus cotylalveus</i> Emlong, 1966, <i>A. polydentatus</i> Sawamura in Barnes <i>et al.</i>, 1995, <i>A. tomitai</i> Kimura & Barnes in Barnes <i>et al.</i>, 1995, <i>A. weltoni</i> Barnes & Kimura in Barnes <i>et al.</i>, 1995.</p> <p> <i>Definition:</i> The monophyletic group containing the most recent common ancestor of <i>Aetiocetus cotylalveus</i> and <i>A. polydentatus</i> and all of its descendants.</p> <p> <i>Emended diagnosis:</i> Small toothed mysticetes with three or fewer small and simple anterior and posterior denticles on posterior upper teeth, anterior and postcanine teeth weakly heterodont (synapomorphies of species of <i>Aetiocetus</i>); triangular anterior extension of parietal–frontal suture, fine vertical enamel ridges only on lingual surface of postcanine teeth, wide diastemata between postcanine teeth, and rostral width at antorbital notch relative to occipital condyle width <i>></i> 170% (possible synapomorphies of species of <i>Aetiocetus</i>); lacrimal with large and lobate dorsal exposure, palate window exposing vomer present and formed by maxilla and premaxilla, and distinct internal narial notch formed by palatine, pterygoid and vomer (synapomorphies of <i>Aetiocetus</i> + <i>Chonecetus</i>); zygomatic process of squamosal expanded near its anterior margin and at its posterior end but narrow in its middle, short overlap of jugal by squamosal, and coronoid process of dentary well developed with concave posterior margin (aetiocetid synapomorphies); mandibular symphysis not sutured, descending process of maxilla developed as an edentulous infraorbital plate, anterior and postcanine teeth moderately to weakly heterodont or absent (apomorphies shared with toothed and edentulous mysticetes); supraorbital processes of frontal elevated and at same level as cranial vertex, distinct intertemporal region, anteriorly placed external narial opening, and retention of adult dentition (plesiomorphies shared with dorudontine archaeocetes).</p>Published as part of <i>Deméré, Thomas A. & Berta, Annalisa, 2008, Skull anatomy of the Oligocene toothed mysticete Aetioceus weltoni (Mammalia; Cetacea): implications for mysticete evolution and functional anatomy, pp. 308-352 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 154 (2)</i> on page 312, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00414.x, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5446647">http://zenodo.org/record/5446647</a&gt

    New material of a ‘short-faced’ <i>Trogosus</i> (Mammalia, Tillodontia) from the Delmar Formation (Bridgerian), San Diego County, California, U.S.A.

    No full text
    <p>The ‘Swami's Point local fauna,’ recovered from the Delmar Formation in coastal San Diego County, California, U.S.A., represents the first documented Bridgerian vertebrate assemblage in this region. The Delmar Formation is chronologically constrained (ca. 48–47 Ma) on the basis of paleomagnetic polarities, the superposition of marine strata containing nannofossils of the CP 12b subzone, and occurrences of the Bridgerian index taxa <i>Trogosus castoriden</i>s and <i>Hyrachyus modestus</i>. The specimen of <i>Trogosus</i> (SDSNH 40819) is assigned here to the genotypic species, <i>T. castoridens</i>, hitherto known only from incomplete dentaries from the middle Bridgerian (Br2) Bridger Formation, Green River Basin, Wyoming. The present specimen is represented by a skull with diagnostically short rostrum, incomplete stylohyoids, posterior parts of both dentaries, and cervical vertebrae from a single individual. This is one of the most anatomically informative specimens of <i>Trogosus</i> and for the first time provides details of the basicranial region in the order Tillodontia. A well-preserved occipitomastoid process is clearly composed of the mastoid process of the petrosal and the paracondylar process of the exoccipital. Cranial comparison reveals greater similarity with <i>T. hyracoides</i> from the Bridger Formation than with <i>T. grangeri</i> and <i>T. hillsii</i> from the Huerfano Basin, Colorado. The results of a phylogenetic analysis suggest that the short-faced condition evolved at least twice in species of <i>Trogosus</i> and leads to recognition of two sympatric trogosine species pairs: <i>T. hyracoides + T. castoridens</i> from the Green River Basin and <i>T. grangeri + T. hillsii</i> from from the Huerfano Basin.</p> <p>SUPPLEMENTAL DATA—Supplemental materials are available for this article for free at <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/UJVP" target="_blank">www.tandfonline.com/UJVP</a></p> <p>Citation for this article: Miyata, K., and T. A. Deméré. 2016. New material of a ‘short-faced’ <i>Trogosus</i> (Mammalia, Tillodontia) from the Delmar Formation (Bridgerian), San Diego County, California, U.S.A. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2016.1089878. </p
    corecore