Disability and satisfaction after Rotator Cuff decompression or repair: a sex and gender analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Rotator-cuff pathology is the most common cause of pain and disability in the shoulder. Examining the combined effect of biological and societal factors on disability would potentially identify existing differences between men and women with rotator cuff pathology which would help to provide suggestions for better models of care. Purpose of this study was to determine the overall differences in disability between men and women and to examine the relationship between factors that represent sex (biological factors) and gender (non-biological factors) with disability and satisfaction with surgical outcome 6 months after rotator cuff surgery.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients with impingement syndrome and/or rotator cuff tear who underwent rotator cuff surgery completed the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index, the American Shoulder & Elbow Surgeons (ASES) assessment form, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) outcome measures prior to surgery and 6 months post-operatively. They also rated their satisfaction with surgery at their follow-up appointment.</p> <p>Results and Discussion</p> <p>One hundred and seventy patients entered into the study (85 men and 85 women). One hundred and sixty patients (94%) completed the 6-month assessment. Women reported more disability both prior to and after surgery. Disability at 6 months was associated with pain-limited range of motion, participation limitation, age and strength. Satisfaction with surgery was associated with level of reported disability, expectations for improved pain, pain-limited range of motion and strength.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results of this study indicate that women with rotator cuff pathology suffer from higher levels of pre- and post-operative disability and sex and gender qualities contribute to these differences. Gender-sensitive approach will help to identify existing differences between men and women which will help to promote more effective and tailored care by health professionals.</p

2023 Roger A. Mann Award Winner: Younger Patients Undergoing Total Ankle Arthroplasty Experience Higher Complication Rates and Worse Functional Outcomes Scores

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Although many patients with postraumatic ankle arthritis are of a younger age, studies evaluating the impact of age on outcomes of primary total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) reveal heterogenous results. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of age on complication rates and patient reported outcomes after TAA. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 1,185 primary TAA divided into 3 age cohorts (Age 70, n=278). Patient demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, and patient reported outcome measures were compared among groups using univariable analyses. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to assess risk for implant failure by age group. Mean follow-up was 5.7 years. Results: Compared to Age55-70 and Age>70 groups, Age 70 compared to Age < 55 patients (HR: 0.43 [95%CI: 0.19-0.94], p=0.034; and HR: 0.42 [95%CI: 0.18-0.95], p=0.038, respectively). Across the AOFAS Hindfoot and all FAOS subscales, Age < 55 group reported the lowest (worst) mean pre and postoperative scores (p < 0.001). The age < 55 group had the highest mean VAS score at final follow-up (22 vs 14 vs 14; p< 0.001). Conclusion: Studies involving large sample sizes with mid-to long-term follow up are critical to reveal age-related impacts on outcomes after TAA. Younger patients had higher rates of complications and implant failure and fared worse on patient reported outcome measures in the largest single-institution series to date evaluating the effect of age on outcomes in TAA

Obesity Significantly Impacts Patient Reported Outcomes after Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Results from 615 Controls and 478 Patients with Obesity

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: There is limited data evaluating the effect of obesity on outcomes following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), especially in adequate sample sizes to detect impacts on patient reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of obesity on complication rates and PROs. Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective study of 1,093 primary TAA performed between 2001 and 2020. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI) into Control (BMI=18.5-29.9; n=615), Obesity Class I (BMI=30.0-34.9; n=285), and Obesity Class II (BMI>35.0; n=193) groups. Patient information, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, PRO measures were compared between groups using univariable statistics. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to assess risk for implant failure. Mean follow-up was 5.6 years (sd:3.1). Results: Compared to Control and Class I, Class II patients had the lowest mean age (p=0.001), highest mean ASA score (p 0.05). Preoperatively, Class II had lower (worse) mean scores for FAOS Pain and ADL subscales than Controls (posthoc pairwise p< 0.001 for both). At final follow-up, both Class II and Class I had lower (worse) mean SMFA (posthoc pairwise p< 0.001 and p=0.030, respectively) and SF36 scores (posthoc pairwise p< 0.001 and p=0.005, respectively) than Controls. Conclusion: At midterm follow-up, obesity was not associated with increased rates of complications after TAA. Patients with obesity reported worse musculoskeletal function and overall quality of life after TAA but there was no differential improvement in PROs across BMI classes. To our knowledge, this is the largest single institution study to date examining the effect of obesity on outcomes after primary TAA

Complication Rates and Functional Outcomes after Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Other Introduction/Purpose: Utilization rates of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) have greatly increased in recent years. For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing TAA, conflicting data have been reported regarding risk of complications and patient reported outcome (PRO) improvement when compared to patients with osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study is to compare complication rates and PROs of patients with RA to patients with osteoarthritis and posttraumatic arthritis. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 1,071 primary TAA performed at a single institution between 2001 and 2020. Minimum follow-up was two years. Patients were stratified by indication for TAA (osteoarthritis, n=372; posttraumatic arthritis, n=642; RA, n=57). Patient demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, and PRO measures were compared between groups using univariable statistics. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to assess risk for implant failure. Mean follow-up was 5.6 years (SD: 3.1). Results: Compared to the osteoarthritis and posttraumatic arthritis groups, the RA cohort had the lowest mean age (p < 0.001), lowest percentage of males (p < 0.001), and highest ASA score (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed no statistically significant difference for infection rates among groups (p=1.0). The RA cohort had the highest rate of heterotopic ossification postoperatively (2/57, 3.5%, p< 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed no increased risk of implant failure for the RA cohort (p=0.23). For the SMFA, SF-36, AOFAS-hindfoot, FAOS-symptoms, and FAOS-ADL the RA group reported the worst scores at final follow-up (p < 0.001). However, the RA cohort demonstrated the largest improvements from preoperative to postoperative scores on the FADI, SF-36, and the symptoms and ADL subscales of the FAOS (p=0.04, 0.01, 0.03, 0.03). Conclusion: In the largest single institution study to date, patients with RA had the worst PRO scores compared to the osteoarthritis and posttraumatic arthritis groups. However, they experienced significantly higher improvements in functional outcomes from their preoperative baseline. Large patient samples with mid- to long-term follow up such as a presented in this series are imperative to fully understand the risk-benefit of TAA in various patient cohorts