Patterns of initiation of second generation antipsychotics for bipolar disorder: a month-by-month analysis of provider behavior

Background: Several second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) received FDA approval for bipolar disorder in the 2000s. Although efficacious, they have been costly and may cause significant side effects. Little is known about the factors associated with prescribers’ decisions to initiate SGA prescriptions for this condition. Methods: We gathered administrative data from the Department of Veterans Affairs on 170,713 patients with bipolar disorder between fiscal years 2003–2010. Patients without a prior history of taking SGAs were considered eligible for SGA initiation during the study (n =126,556). Generalized estimating equations identified demographic, clinical, and comorbidity variables associated with initiation of an SGA prescription on a month-by-month basis. Results: While the number of patients with bipolar disorder using SGAs nearly doubled between 2003 and 2010, analyses controlling for patient characteristics and the rise in the bipolar population revealed a 1.2% annual decline in SGA initiation during this period. Most medical comorbidities were only modestly associated with overall SGA initiation, although significant differences emerged among individual SGAs. Several markers of patient severity predicted SGA initiation, including previous hospitalizations, psychotic features, and a history of other antimanic prescriptions; these severity markers became less firmly linked to SGA initiation over time. Providers in the South were somewhat more likely to initiate SGA treatment. Conclusions: The number of veterans with bipolar disorder prescribed SGAs is rising steadily, but this increase appears primarily driven by a corresponding increase in the bipolar population. Month-by-month analyses revealed that higher illness severity predicted SGA initiation, but that this association may be weakening over time

Olanzapine increases weight and serum triglyceride levels

Background: Previous studies have suggested that clozapine is associated with increases in both weight and serum triglyceride (but not cholesterol) levels. Because of the pharmacologic similarities between clozapine and olanzapine, we decided to evaluate if olanzapine use was associated with an increase in triglycerides. Method: Twenty-five inpatients (21 men, 4 women) were treated with olanzapine, and their outcomes were tracked prospectively in a medication utilization evaluation study. Results: After 12 weeks on a mean ± SD dose of 13.8 ± 4.4 mg/day, weight increased a mean of 12 lb (5.4 kg; from 190 ± 37 lb [85.5 ± 16.7 kg] to 202 ± 30 lb [90.9 ± 13.5 kg]), while fasting triglycerides increased a mean of 60 mg/dL (from 162 ± 121 mg/dL to 222 ± 135 mg/dL). Both increases were significant at p \u3c .05. Fasting total cholesterol did not increase. The triglyceride increase was even larger when we excluded 8 patients who received various interventions to lower lipid levels (e.g., pravastatin, low-fat diet) during the olanzapine trial. There was a strong association between weight change and triglyceride change (p \u3c .02); after controlling for weight, analysis of covariance showed no independent increase in triglycerides. Conclusion: These results suggest olanzapine has significant effects on weight and serum triglyceride levels. Clinical implications are discussed

Revising Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria for the bipolar disorders: Phase I of the AREDOC project.

Objective: To derive new criteria sets for defining manic and hypomanic episodes (and thus for defining the bipolar I and II disorders), an international Task Force was assembled and termed AREDOC reflecting its role of Assessment, Revision and Evaluation of DSM and other Operational Criteria. This paper reports on the first phase of its deliberations and interim criteria recommendations. Method: The first stage of the process consisted of reviewing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, and recent International Classification of Diseases criteria, identifying their limitations and generating modified criteria sets for further in-depth consideration. Task Force members responded to recommendations for modifying criteria and from these the most problematic issues were identified. Results: Principal issues focussed on by Task Force members were how best to differentiate mania and hypomania, how to judge ‘impairment’ (both in and of itself and allowing that functioning may sometimes improve during hypomanic episodes) and concern that rejecting some criteria (e.g. an imposed duration period) might risk false-positive diagnoses of the bipolar disorders. Conclusion: This first-stage report summarises the clinical opinions of international experts in the diagnosis and management of the bipolar disorders, allowing readers to contemplate diagnostic parameters that may influence their clinical decisions. The findings meaningfully inform subsequent Task Force stages (involving a further commentary stage followed by an empirical study) that are expected to generate improved symptom criteria for diagnosing the bipolar I and II disorders with greater precision and to clarify whether they differ dimensionally or categorically