28 research outputs found
Design of structures by a splitting method
A simplified method for the design of multi-spar wing boxes is presented.
In typical multi-spar wing boxes the spars divide the boxes into cells. In the method
presented these are analyzed individually, with adjacent cells taking their share of the
stiffnesses of the common spar wall. This splitting method yields a design method
that is computationally much quicker than designing a complete wing box, because
each cell is considered separately from the others, except for linking between their
design variables. The critical buckling load factor of the assembled structure when
designed in this way will usually exceed the design load factor and otherwise will be
equal to it, i.e. the design is guaranteed to be conservative
Buckling load reduction for stiffened panels due to cutouts in ribs
In aerospace structures it is common to find stiffened panels with transverse
supporting structures, e.g. wing ribs or fuselage frames. Incorporating cutouts into
these supporting structures to allow the stringers to pass through freely considerably
reduces the buckling load of the panels. It is shown that a minor modification in the
fabrication of the stiffened panel gives most of the advantages of cutouts while still
giving a buckling load close to that of a panel with no cutouts
Optimization of postbuckled stiffened panels with multiple stiffener sizes
The panel analysis and optimization code VICONOPT, based on exact strip theory, is
utilized to investigate the optimum design of stiffened panels with multiple stiffener sizes or
substiffeners. The optimization ensures that the buckling stability of the panel includes an
allowance for postbuckling reserve of strength. The adoption of this approach necessarily
results in the local buckling stress being lower than the overall buckling stress and with the
introduction of substiffeners introduces extra buckling modes. This complicates the post
buckling behavior of the panel which is investigated by examining the case when the smaller
stiffeners lose stiffness, i.e. there is a change from a local to a torsional mode. The panels are
loaded in axial compression with a sinusoidal imperfection. It is found that small mass
savings are achieved by using stiffeners of more than one size and there is an increase in the
spacing of the major stiffeners and transverse supports. The optimum panel designs
obtained by VICONOPT are evaluated by comparison with the optimum designs produced
with one size of stiffener
Postbuckled stability of panels with torsional buckling
The panel analysis and optimization code VICONOPT, based on exact strip theory, is
utilized to investigate the postbuckling stability of a stiffened aerospace panel in a torsional
buckled state. The paper shows that the postbuckling characteristics of a panel buckling in
a torsional mode has similarity to the postbuckling behavior of a panel with a skin initiated
mode and a panel initiated mode. The postbuckled stiffness of the torsional mode is similar
to the skin mode in terms of load versus end shortening and is similar to the panel
postbuckling behavior in terms of load versus out-of-plane deflection. If the panel has
stiffeners of more than one size then there are multiple torsional modes. For panel design it
is suggested that small stiffener buckling, i.e., in a torsional mode, can have postbuckling
stability with regard to the growth of the out-of-plane deflection. If the large stiffeners
initiate the buckling then there is no postbuckling reserve of strength. This has implications
for design of such panels as mass could be saved if allowance is made for small stiffener
buckling in the optimization process
Buckling and vibration of stiffened panels or single plates with clamped ends
An efficient method for the buckling and vibration analysis of plates or
stiffened panels with clamped ends is presented. The method uses Lagrangian
multipliers to couple sinusoidal modes with appropriate half-wavelengths of response,
thereby enforcing the end conditions at discrete point supports. Clamped ends can
usually be modelled accurately using only a few point supports, while arguments from
symmetry often enable some of the required end conditions to be satisfied without
explicitly applying constraints. In such cases few half-wavelengths are needed to
obtain excellent accuracy. Solutions obtained for the simple limiting case of single
plates are exact or within 1% of the classical or other reported solutions. Solutions
obtained for stiffened panels are in close agreement with those obtained using finite
element analysis
Optimum design and testing of a postbuckled stiffened panel
The efficient, industrially used, linear elastic
preliminary design software VICONOPT is employed
to design a stiffened panel with a post-buckled
reserve of strength. The initial buckling mode is a
local skin mode in longitudinal compression with
allowance being made for the effects of an initial
overall imperfection. The resulting panel has been
analyzed using the non-linear FE package ABAQUS
and four laboratory specimens have been tested to
failure. The similarity of the experimental failure with
the VICONOPT and ABAQUS predictions suggests
that VICONOPT can give a satisfactory preliminary
design. While neither model matches completely the
boundary conditions found in a real aircraft
compression panel, it is suggested that the
VICONOPT model may be a better representation
than either the ABAQUS model or the experimental
tests
Postbuckling of stiffened panels using strut, strip, and finite element methods
Postbuckling results are presented for isotropic stiffened panels loaded in compression. Comparisons are made
between single-bay and double-bay nite element (FE) models (where “bay” denotes a repeating portion, between
supports, in the load/length direction) and a new strut model, following a Shanley-type approach, for single-bay
and multibay panels. The strut model has been incorporated within the strip programVIPASA with CONstraints
and OPTimization (VICONOPT) to design a multibay example panel with postbuckling reserve of strength in its
skins, assuming linear elastic material properties. The panel has been shown by VICONOPT to have a stiffener
buckling failuremode when an overall sinusoidal imperfection causing increased stiffener compression is present.
The failure is con rmed by the double-bay FE model, which is shown to be an imperfect representation of the
multibay case. Single-bay analysis using the strut model shows good agreement with the single-bay FE results.
The VICONOPT code is able to design a metallic panel of realistic dimensions and loading using 50 strip elements
(compared with the 9600 shell elements required by the nite element model) but cannot correctly account for
material nonlinearity. The important phenomenological difference between postbuckling of single-, double-, and
multibay panel models are indicated
Analysis and testing of a postbuckled stiffened panel
The suitability of using the ef cient, linear elastic design softwareVICONOPT for the analysisof a stiffened panel
with a postbuckling reserve of strength is investigated. A longitudinallycompressed panel, which initially buckled
in a local skin mode, was analyzed with allowance being made for the effects of an initial overall imperfection.
The panel was also analyzed using the nonlinear nite element package ABAQUS, and four laboratory specimens
that represent the panel were tested to failure. The similarity of the experimental failure with the VICONOPT
and ABAQUS predictions indicates that VICONOPT can give satisfactory analysis results for use in preliminary
design
The 2017 OHBM Replication Award
Protocol, submissions and scores of the 2017 OHBM Replication Award
Optimum design and testing of a post-buckled stiffened panel
The efficient, industrially used, linear elastic
preliminary design software VICONOPT is employed
to design a stiffened panel with a post-buckled
reserve of strength. The initial buckling mode is a
local skin mode in longitudinal compression with
allowance being made for the effects of an initial
overall imperfection. The resulting panel has been
analyzed using the non-linear FE package ABAQUS
and four laboratory specimens have been tested to
failure. The similarity of the experimental failure with
the VICONOPT and ABAQUS predictions suggests
that VICONOPT can give a satisfactory preliminary
design. While neither model matches completely the
boundary conditions found in a real aircraft
compression panel, it is suggested that the
VICONOPT model may be a better representation
than either the ABAQUS model or the experimental
tests