Win-stay, lose-switch and public information strategies for patch fidelity of songbirds with rare extra-pair paternity

Determining where organisms breed and understanding why they breed in particular locations are fundamental biological questions with conservation implications. Breeding-site fidelity is common in migratory, territorial songbirds and is typically thought to occur following reproductive success with a social mate and success of nearby conspecifics. It is currently unknown if frequency of extra-pair paternity in a population influences use of information about reproductive success of nearby conspecifics for site fidelity decisions. We investigated patch fidelity of white-eyed vireos (Vireo griseus) based on reproductive success and quantified frequency of extra-pair paternity. We found support only for females making patch fidelity decisions following reproductive success with a social mate. Patch fidelity of males was not associated with reproductive success of nearby conspecifics, suggesting males may not use this information when extra-pair paternity is infrequent or the association is non-existent in this species

A theoretical framework for understanding the ecology and conservation of bamboo-specialist birds

Worldwide, populations of a diverse array of bamboo-specialist birds must respond to the life cycles of typical woody bamboos, which include a long vegetative phase, a short period in sexual reproduction (seeding), and a short period dead. While some bamboo species flower continuously in time, but scattered in space, over different parts of their distribution, others exhibit a single, synchronized mass-seeding event, followed by death over hundreds of square kilometers. Thus, bamboo-specialist birds experience extreme variability in their habitat and food sources, and may pass from a period of overabundant habitat and food resources to a period of extreme resource scarcity. At a community level, bamboo species are out of phase with each other. Masting events of several bamboo species may coincide one cycle, but not the next. The resulting long-term dynamics of bamboo cycles at a community scale will result in a temporal and geographic mosaic of resource availability over very long periods of time, where the initial conditions that any bird experienced may occur only sporadically over centuries and very large regions. We aim to propose a theoretical framework for understanding the population ecology of bamboo-specialist birds and discuss implications for their conservation. Three main diet and life-history strategies of bamboo-specialist birds can be identified based on their natural history. First, insectivorous bamboo specialists that inhabit woody bamboos may be relatively sedentary during the long vegetative growth phase, but they must experience population declines, switch to alternative habitat, or travel widely during bamboo die-off events. They benefit from long-term habitat stability but must face short-term reductions in habitat that do not affect all generations of birds. Second, bamboo seed specialists must rely on an ephemeral source of food available only after large intervals of time at most locations. Since bamboo cycles are typically much longer than the lives of individual birds, there is no chance for seed-specialist birds to learn when and where bamboo seeds will be available in the future. Thus, although bamboo seed availability is ecologically predictable (i. e., seeds are always available after the same length of time at a given place), seed availability is unpredictable to individual birds. During their lifetime, most individual bamboo seed-specialists must face a lack of their preferred food supply, at which time they must wander to survive. And third, mixed strategists usually feed on bamboo shoots, leaves, and insects, but consume bamboo seeds when available. Their life history combines elements of both previous categories: they can benefit from long-term habitat stability like insectivores, and take advantage of masting events like seed specialists. Niche width (degree of specialization) in conjugation with the long-term dynamics of bamboo cycles should determine the degree of nomadism and amplitude of bamboo-specialist population cycles. Nomadism appears to be distributed along a continuum from the temporarily nomad insectivores and mixed strategists to the local and regional nomadic seed specialists. A protected area cannot shelter healthy populations of the most specialized bamboo-seed specialists because they track temporally and spatially unpredictable resources over large temporal and spatial scales. Overall, to effectively protect this ecological system, it is crucial to conserve a network of natural areas capable of providing bamboo in different phases and at different times and places, as well as subsidiary food resources that will allow birds to move away from bamboo patches as they become unsuitable to new, suitable patches. © 2012 Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V.Fil: Areta, Juan Ignacio. Provincia de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia de Tecnología a la Producción. Universidad Autónoma de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia de Tecnología a la Producción. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia de Tecnología a la Producción; Argentina. Grupo FALCO; ArgentinaFil: Cockle, Kristina Louise. Provincia de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia de Tecnología a la Producción. Universidad Autónoma de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia de Tecnología a la Producción. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia de Tecnología a la Producción; Argentina. Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara; Argentina. Universidad Maimónides; Argentina. University of British Columbia; Canad

Anti-brood parasite defences : the role of individual and social learning

In this chapter, we consider the ways in which learning is involved in the antibrood parasitism defences that hosts deploy across the nesting cycle. Brood parasitism varies in space and through time, and hosts have accordingly evolved plastic defences that can be tuned to local conditions. Hosts can achieve their defence plasticity by individual and social learning, as well as by experienceindependent mechanisms. While these mechanisms can profoundly affect the coevolutionary dynamics between hosts and their brood parasites, our understanding of how they feature across the host nesting cycle is far from complete. Hosts can actively defend themselves against brood parasitism via a variety of behaviours, including nest defence, egg discrimination and chick discrimination. Such anti-brood parasite defences rely on the host ’ s ability to recognise and then defend against the parasitic threat, and there is good evidence that both these components of discrimination can be in fl uenced by learning. To date, most research has focused on the function of learning in nest defence, but the learning mechanisms underlying egg discrimination are much better understood; and despite some notable exceptions, the role of learning in chick discrimination remains largely unexplored. An important challenge now is to understand the observed plasticity of anti-brood parasite defences in the context of environmental heterogeneity and speci fi cally in terms of variation in the presence, detection and reliability of parasitism cues