TrpC3 Regulates Hypertrophy-Associated Gene Expression without Affecting Myocyte Beating or Cell Size

Pathological cardiac hypertrophy is associated with an increased risk of heart failure and cardiovascular mortality. Calcium (Ca2+) -regulated gene expression is essential for the induction of hypertrophy, but it is not known how myocytes distinguish between the Ca2+ signals that regulate contraction and those that lead to cardiac hypertrophy. We used in vitro neonatal rat ventricular myocytes to perform an RNA interference (RNAi) screen for ion channels that mediate Ca2+-dependent gene expression in response to hypertrophic stimuli. We identified several ion channels that are linked to hypertrophic gene expression, including transient receptor potential C3 (TrpC3). RNAi-mediated knockdown of TrpC3 decreases expression of hypertrophy-associated genes such as the A- and B-type natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP) in response to numerous hypertrophic stimuli, while TrpC3 overexpression increases BNP expression. Furthermore, stimuli that induce hypertrophy dramatically increase TrpC3 mRNA levels. Importantly, whereas TrpC3-knockdown strongly reduces gene expression associated with hypertrophy, it has a negligible effect on cell size and on myocyte beating. These results suggest that Ca2+ influx through TrpC3 channels increases transcription of genes associated with hypertrophy but does not regulate the signaling pathways that control cell size or contraction. Thus TrpC3 may represent an important therapeutic target for the treatment of cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure

Friends with Benefits: Social Coupons as a Strategy to Enhance Customers’ Social Empowerment

Businesses often seek to leverage customers’ social networks to acquire new customers and stimulate word-of-mouth recommendations. While customers make brand recommendations for various reasons (e.g., incentives, reputation enhancement), they are also motivated by a desire for social empowerment—to feel an impact on others. In several multi-method studies, we show that facilitating sharing of social coupons (i.e., coupon sets that include one for self-use and one to be shared) is a unique marketing strategy that facilitates social empowerment. Firms benefit from social coupons because customers who share spend more and report greater purchase intentions than those who do not. Furthermore, we demonstrate that social coupons are most effective when the sharer’s brand relationship is new versus established. For customers with an established relationship, sharing with a receiver who also has an established relationship maximizes potential impact. Together, these studies connect social empowerment to relationship marketing and provide guidance to managers targeting social coupons

beta-arrestin 2-dependent angiotensin II type 1A receptor-mediated pathway of chemotaxis

International audienc

Activation of the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway and protein O-GlcNAcylation modulate hypertrophic and cell signaling pathways in cardiomyocytes from diabetic mice

Patients with diabetes have a much greater risk of developing heart failure than non-diabetic patients, particularly in response to an additional hemodynamic stress such as hypertension or infarction. Previous studies have shown that increased glucose metabolism via the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway (HBP) and associated increase in O-linked-β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) levels on proteins contributed to the adverse effects of diabetes on the heart. Therefore, in this study we tested the hypothesis that diabetes leads to impaired cardiomyocyte hypertrophic and cell signaling pathways due to increased HBP flux and O-GlcNAc modification on proteins. Cardiomyocytes isolated from type 2 diabetic db/db mice and non-diabetic controls were treated with 1 μM ANG angiotensin II (ANG) and 10 μM phenylephrine (PE) for 24 h. Activation of hypertrophic and cell signaling pathways was determined by assessing protein expression levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), α-sarcomeric actin, p53, Bax and Bcl-2 and phosphorylation of p38, ERK and Akt. ANG II and PE significantly increased levels of ANP and α-actin and phosphorylation of p38 and ERK in the non-diabetic but not in the diabetic group; phosphorylation of Akt was unchanged irrespective of group or treatment. Constitutive Bcl-2 levels were lower in diabetic hearts, while there was no difference in p53 and Bax. Activation of the HBP and increased protein O-GlcNAcylation in non-diabetic cardiomyocytes exhibited a significantly decreased hypertrophic signaling response to ANG or PE compared to control cells. Inhibition of the HBP partially restored the hypertrophic signaling response of diabetic cardiomyocytes. These results suggest that activation of the HBP and protein O-GlcNAcylation modulates hypertrophic and cell signaling pathways in type 2 diabetes

Revisiting the Instrumentality of Voice: Having Voice in the Process Makes People Think They Will Get What They Want

Research on procedural justice has found that processes that allow people voice (i.e., input) are perceived as fairer, and thus elicit more positive reactions, than processes that do not allow people voice. Original theorizing attributed these effects to beliefs that the provision of voice enhances people’s sense of process control, which people were assumed to value because it impacts their perceived likelihood of receiving desired outcomes (the instrumental perspective of procedural justice). Subsequent research questioned this perspective, arguing that outcome expectations do not account for the effects of voice. However, this subsequent research failed to directly examine the interplay of voice, outcome expectations, and reactions. The current studies revisit and extend research on this topic by asking whether manipulations of voice act as shared circumstance effects. Confirming an untested implication of the instrumental perspective, we show that giving everyone voice increases their belief, ex-ante, that they are likely to win an upcoming competition. However, this instrumental belief accounts for only part of the effects of voice on perceived procedural fairness and on general reactions to outcomes. Results suggest that voice does indeed have instrumental significance, an implication not adequately recognized in current justice theorizing. However, this instrumentality does not, by itself, explain why people value having a voice in processes that affect them