Rodenticide Exposure Among Endangered Kit Foxes Relative to Habitat Use in an Urban Landscape

Endangered San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica) inhabiting Bakersfield, California exhibit a high incidence of exposure to anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs). We examined kit fox habitat use in an effort to determine potential sources of AR exposure. Kit fox capture, den, night, and mortality locations were assigned to one of 10 habitat categories. Using all available locations, foxes that tested positive for second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) were located more frequently on golf courses while those testing negative were located more frequently in commercial areas. Foxes that tested positive for first generation anticoagulant rodenticides (FGARs) were located more frequently in industrial areas while those testing negative were located more frequently on golf courses. Based on night locations (when foxes are foraging), foxes that tested positive for SGARs were found more frequently in undeveloped and golf course habitats. Foxes that tested positive for FGARs were found more frequently in undeveloped, campus, and industrial habitats. Although available data were not sufficient to identify specific point-sources of AR exposure for foxes, golf courses appeared to be used more frequently by foxes exposed to SGARs. However, sources of exposure likely are abundant and widespread in the urban environment. Based on the results of this study, we recommend (1) investigating patterns of AR use in Bakersfield, (2) conducting an outreach program to emphasize the risk from ARs to kit foxes and other wildlife, and (3) continuing to monitor the incidence and patterns of AR exposure among kit foxes in Bakersfield

Assessing personality in San Joaquin kit fox in situ: efficacy of field-based experimental methods and implications for conservation management

Utilisation of animal personality has potential benefit for conservation management. Due to logistics of robust behavioural evaluation in situ, the majority of studies on wild animals involve taking animals into captivity for testing, potentially compromising results. Three in situ tests for evaluation of boldness in San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) were developed (ENOT: extended novel object test; RNOT: rapid novel object test; TH: trap/handling test). Each test successfully identified variation in boldness within its target age class(es). The TH test was suitable for use across all age classes. Tests were assessed for in situ suitability and for quantity/quality of data yielded. ENOT was rated as requiring high levels of time, cost and labour with greater likelihood of failure. However, it was rated highly for data quantity/quality. The TH test was rated as requiring little time, labour and cost, but yielding lower quality data. RNOT was rated in the middle. Each test had merit and could be adapted to suit project or species constraints. We recommend field-based evaluation of personality, reducing removal of animals from the wild and facilitating routine incorporation of personality assessment into conservation projects

COYOTE CONTROL TO PROTECT ENDANGERED SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOXES AT THE NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES, CALIFORNIA

We investigated the effectiveness of a coyote (Canis latrans) control program implemented to increase numbers of endangered San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica) at the Naval Petroleum Reserves in California (NPRC). Between 1980 and 1985, the kit fox population on NPRC declined approximately 66% while coyote abundance apparently increased. Coyote predation was identified as the primary cause of mortality for kit foxes. From 1985 to 1990, the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) sponsored a program to kill coyotes with the objective being to reduce predation on kit foxes and increase fox numbers. Control methods during the first 4 years were limited to trapping, shooting, and denning. In the last 12 months of the program, aerial gunning was implemented and significantly increased control intensity. This more intensive strategy was not conducted for a sufficient length of time to evaluate its effectiveness. Thus, conclusions regarding coyote control at NPRC are based primarily on the first 4 years of the program. During the 5-year effort, 591 coyotes were killed. Although coyote scent-station indices declined during the period of control, the contribution of the control effort to this decline is unclear. Reproductive rates of female coyotes did not exhibit a compensatory increase as is commonly observed when coyote populations are artificially depressed. After control was initiated, kit fox capture indices and survival rates did not increase, and the proportion of fox deaths due to coyotes did not decrease. The number of coyotes removed annually may not have been sufficient to effectively reduce coyote abundance. Kit fox and coyote population trends both were significantly correlated to lagomorph abundance. Thus, food availability probably was the primary factor influencing the population dynamics of both predators. Control efforts were discontinued pending further consideration of the merits of control and its potential efficacy at NPRC

Management and Conservation of San Joaquin Kit Foxes in Urban Environments

The San Joaquin kit fox is listed as federally Endangered and California Threatened, primarily due to habitat loss from agricultural, industrial, and urban developments. However, a population of kit foxes estimated at 200-400 persists within the city of Bakersfield, CA. This population appears to be demographically robust with a high probability of persistence. Thus, this population potentially could contribute to range-wide conservation and recovery efforts. The presence of this population in an urban environment creates management challenges. Management issues include human and pet safety, dens in inconvenient locations, and carcass disposal. Resolution of these issues generally is not difficult. Conservation challenges include roads and vehicles, rodenticides and other toxins, sports netting, den destruction during routine maintenance operations, interspecific competition and disease transmission, movement corridors, and regulatory policy. Although the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan provides protective measures for kit foxes during new construction, such measures do not extend to operations, maintenance, and other routine activities. Furthermore, formal policies regarding management and conservation of urban kit foxes have not yet been developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game, resulting in inconsistent responses to urban kit fox issues. Based on a public opinion survey, Bakersfield residents generally support conservation of urban kit foxes. Successful resolution of management issues will minimize conflicts and enhance efforts to conserve kit foxes

Anticoagulant Rodenticide Exposure in an Urban Population of the San Joaquin Kit Fox

Concerned that San Joaquin kit foxes from urban areas may be exposed to commensal anticoagulants, the California Department of Fish and Game, Pesticide Investigations Unit, in conjunction with the Endangered Species Recovery Program’s Urban Kit Fox Project, began monitoring San Joaquin kit foxes from the Bakersfield, CA population. Necropsies were performed and liver tissue samples collected from kit fox carcasses. Livers from archived kit foxes dating back to 1977 were also analyzed. A non-urban population of San Joaquin kit foxes from Lokern was used as a control. Other predators in the area, including coyotes and red foxes, were also analyzed for comparison. Between 1999 and 2007, tissue samples from 45 animals have been analyzed for residues of anticoagulant rodenticides. Anticoagulant compounds identified included brodifacoum, bromadiolone, pival, and chlorophacinone. Twenty-six of the 30 San Joaquin kit foxes from Bakersfield contained at least one anticoagulant, and the most commonly detected anticoagulant was brodifacoum. None of the 12 Lokern San Joaquin kit foxes contained anticoagulants. Other predators followed the same pattern: both red foxes from Bakersfield contained anticoagulant residues, but the coyote taken from Lokern did not

Anticoagulant Rodenticide Exposure in an Urban Population of the San Joaquin Kit Fox

Concerned that San Joaquin kit foxes from urban areas may be exposed to commensal anticoagulants, the California Department of Fish and Game, Pesticide Investigations Unit, in conjunction with the Endangered Species Recovery Program’s Urban Kit Fox Project, began monitoring San Joaquin kit foxes from the Bakersfield, CA population. Necropsies were performed and liver tissue samples collected from kit fox carcasses. Livers from archived kit foxes dating back to 1977 were also analyzed. A non-urban population of San Joaquin kit foxes from Lokern was used as a control. Other predators in the area, including coyotes and red foxes, were also analyzed for comparison. Between 1999 and 2007, tissue samples from 45 animals have been analyzed for residues of anticoagulant rodenticides. Anticoagulant compounds identified included brodifacoum, bromadiolone, pival, and chlorophacinone. Twenty-six of the 30 San Joaquin kit foxes from Bakersfield contained at least one anticoagulant, and the most commonly detected anticoagulant was brodifacoum. None of the 12 Lokern San Joaquin kit foxes contained anticoagulants. Other predators followed the same pattern: both red foxes from Bakersfield contained anticoagulant residues, but the coyote taken from Lokern did not

EFFECTS OF SIMULATED OIL FIELD DISTURBANCE AND TOPSOIL SALVAGE ON ERIASTRUM HOOVERI (POLEMONIACEAE)

Volume: 45Start Page: 290End Page: 29