[18F]AV-1451 binding in vivo mirrors the expected distribution of TDP-43 pathology in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia

INTRODUCTION: Semantic dementia, including the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), is strongly associated with TAR-DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43) type C pathology. It provides a useful model in which to test the specificity of in vivo binding of the putative tau ligand [18F]AV-1451, which is elevated in frontotemporal lobar degeneration tauopathies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven patients (five with svPPA and two with ‘right’ semantic dementia) and 12 healthy controls underwent positron emission tomography brain imaging with [18F]AV-1451. Two independent preprocessing methods were used. For both methods, all patients had clearly elevated binding potential (BPND (non-displaceable binding potential)) in temporal lobes, lateralising according to their clinical syndrome and evident in raw images. Region of interest analyses confirmed that BPND was significantly increased in temporal regions, insula and fusiform gyrus, consistent with those areas known to be most affected in semantic dementia. Hierarchical cluster analysis, based on the distribution of [18F]AV-1451 binding potential, separated semantic dementia from controls with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS:[18F]AV-1451 binds in vivo regions that are likely to contain TDP-43 and not significant tau pathology. While this suggests a non-tau target for [18F]AV-1451, the pathological regions in semantic dementia do not normally contain significant levels of recently proposed ‘off target’ binding sites for [18F]AV-1451, such as neuronal monoamine oxidase or neuromelanin. Postmortem and longitudinal data will be useful to assess the utility of [18F]AV-1451 to differentiate and track different types of frontotemporal lobar degeneration.This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre and Biomedical Research Unit in Dementia; the Wellcome Trust (JBR 103838); the Association of British Neurologists and the Patrick Berthoud Charitable Trust (TEC)

The Physiology of Dementia: Network reorganisation in progressive non-fluent aphasia as a model of neurodegeneration

The dementias are persistent or progressive disorders affecting more than one cognitive domain that interfere with an individual’s ability to function at work or home, and represent a decline from a previous level of function. In this thesis I consider the neurophysiology of dementia at a number of levels. I investigate the ways in which the connectivity and function of the brain predisposes to the specific focal patterns of neurodegeneration seen in the various dementias. I aim to identify the mesoscopic changes that occur in individuals with neurodegeneration and how these relate to their cognitive difficulties. I show how, by assessing patients in whom there is focal disruption of brain networks and observing the outcomes in comparison to controls, I can gain insight into the mechanisms by which the normal brain makes predictions and processes language. In Chapter 1, I set the scene for the focussed experimental investigations of model diseases by beginning with an introductory, clinically-focussed review that sets out the features, aetiology, management, epidemiology and prognosis of the dementias. This places these model diseases in the context of the broader clinical challenge posed by the dementias. In Chapter 2, I turn to ‘prototypical’ model diseases that represent neurodegenerative tauopathies with predominantly cortical (Alzheimer’s disease, AD) and subcortical (Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, PSP) disease burdens. I investigate the neurophysiological causes and consequences of Tau accumulation by combining graph theoretical analyses of resting state functional MR imaging and in vivo ‘Tau’ PET imaging using the ligand AV-1451. By relating Tau distribution to the functional connectome I provide in vivo evidence consistent with ‘prion-like’ trans-neuronal spread of Tau in AD but not PSP. This provides important validation of disease modification strategies that aim to halt or slow down the progression of AD by sequestration of pathological Tau in the synapse. In contrast, I demonstrate associations consistent with regional vulnerability to Tau accumulation due to metabolic demand and a lack of trophic support in PSP but not AD. With a cross-sectional approach, using Tau burden as a surrogate marker of disease severity, I then go on to show how the changes in functional connectivity that occur as disease progresses account for the contrasting cognitive phenotypes in AD and PSP. In advancing AD, functional connectivity across the whole brain becomes increasingly random and disorganised, accounting for symptomatology across multiple cognitive domains. In advancing PSP, by contrast, disrupted cortico-subcortical and cortico-brainstem interactions meant that information transfer passed through a larger number of cortical nodes, reducing closeness centrality and eigenvector centrality, while increasing weighted degree, clustering, betweenness centrality and local efficiency. Together, this resulted in increasingly modular processing with inter-network communication taking less direct paths, accounting for the bradyphrenia characteristic of the ‘subcortical dementias’. From chapter 3 onwards, I turn to the in-depth study of a model disease called non-fluent variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (nfvPPA). This disease has a clear clinical phenotype of speech apraxia and agrammatism, associated with a focal pattern of mild atrophy in frontal lobes. Importantly, general cognition is usually well preserved until late disease. In chapter 3 itself, I relate an experiment in which patients with nfvPPA and matched controls performed a receptive language task while having their brain activity recorded with magnetoencephalography. I manipulated expectations and sensory detail to explore the role of top-down frontal contributions to predictive processes in speech perception. I demonstrate that frontal neurodegeneration led to inflexible and excessively precise predictions, and that fronto-temporal interactions play a causal role in reconciling prior predictions with degraded sensory signals. The discussion here concentrates on the insights provided by neurodegenerative disease into the normal function of the brain in processing language. Overall, I demonstrate that higher level frontal mechanisms for cognitive and behavioural flexibility make a critical functional contribution to the hierarchical generative models underlying speech perception In chapter 4, I precisely define the sequence processing and statistical learning abilities of patients with nfvPPA in comparison to patients with non-fluent aphasia due to stroke and neurological controls. I do this by exposing participants to a novel, mixed-complexity artificial grammar designed to assess processing of increasingly complex sequencing relationships, and then assessing the degree of implicit rule learning. I demonstrate that agrammatic aphasics of two different aetiologies are not disproportionately impaired on complex sequencing relationships, and that the learning of phonological and non-linguistic sequences occurs independently in health and disease. In chapter 5, I summarise the synergies between the experimental chapters, and explain how I have applied a systems identification framework to a diverse set of experimental methods, with the common goal of defining the physiology of dementia. I then return to the results of chapter 3 with a clinical focus to explain how inflexible predictions can account for subjective speech comprehension difficulties, auditory processing abnormalities and (in synthesis with chapter 4) receptive agrammatism in nfvPPA. Overall, this body of work has contributed to knowledge in several ways. It has achieved its tripartite aims by: 1) Providing in vivo evidence consistent with theoretical models of trans-neuronal Tau spread (chapter 2), and a comprehensive clinical account of the previously poorly-understood receptive symptomatology of nfvPPA (chapter 5), thus demonstrating that systems neuroscience can provide a translational bridge between the molecular biology of dementia and clinical trials of therapies and medications. In this way, I begin to disentangle the network-level causes of neurodegeneration from its consequences. 2) Providing evidence for a causal role for fronto-temporal interactions in language processing (chapter 3), and demonstrating domain separation of statistical learning between linguistic and non-linguistic sequences (chapter 4), thus demonstrating that studies of patients with neurodegenerative disease can further our understanding of normative brain function. 3) Successfully integrating neuropsychology, behavioural psychophysics, functional MRI, structural MRI, magnetoencephalography and computational modelling to provide comprehensive research training, as the platform for a future research programme in the physiology of dementia.Association of British Neurologists Patrick Berthoud Charitcable Trus

Advances in neuroimaging to support translational medicine in dementia.

Advances in neuroimaging are ideally placed to facilitate the translation from progress made in cellular genetics and molecular biology of neurodegeneration into improved diagnosis, prevention and treatment of dementia. New positron emission tomography (PET) ligands allow one to quantify neuropathology, inflammation and metabolism in vivo safely and reliably, to examine mechanisms of human disease and support clinical trials. Developments in MRI-based imaging and neurophysiology provide complementary quantitative assays of brain function and connectivity, for the direct testing of hypotheses of human pathophysiology. Advances in MRI are also improving the quantitative imaging of vascular risk and comorbidities. In combination with large datasets, open data and artificial intelligence analysis methods, new informatics-based approaches are set to enable accurate single-subject inferences for diagnosis, prediction and treatment that have the potential to deliver precision medicine for dementia. Here, we show, through the use of critically appraised worked examples, how neuroimaging can bridge the gaps between molecular biology, neural circuits and the dynamics of the core systems that underpin complex behaviours. We look beyond traditional structural imaging used routinely in clinical care, to include ultrahigh field MRI (7T MRI), magnetoencephalography and PET with novel ligands. We illustrate their potential as safe, robust and sufficiently scalable to be viable for experimental medicine studies and clinical trials. They are especially informative when combined in multimodal studies, with model-based analyses to test precisely defined hypotheses.TEC is supported by an NIHR Clinical Lectureship. RSW is funded by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship (201567/Z/16/Z). JBR is supported by the Wellcome Trust (103838) and MRC (SUAG051/G101400)

In vivo PET imaging of neuroinflammation in familial frontotemporal dementia.

INTRODUCTION: We report in vivo patterns of neuroinflammation and abnormal protein aggregation in seven cases of familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with mutations in MAPT, GRN and C9orf72 genes. METHODS: Using positron emission tomography (PET), we explored the association of the distribution of activated microglia, as measured by the radioligand [11C]PK11195, and the regional distribution of tau or TDP-43 pathology, indexed using the radioligand [18F]AV-1451. The familial FTD PET data were compared with healthy controls. RESULTS: Patients with familial FTD across all mutation groups showed increased [11C]PK11195 binding predominantly in frontotemporal regions, with additional regions showing abnormalities in individuals. Patients with MAPT mutations had a consistent distribution of [18F]AV-1451 binding across the brain, with heterogeneous distributions among carriers of GRN and C9orf72 mutations. DISCUSSION: This case series suggests that neuroinflammation is part of the pathophysiology of familial FTD, warranting further consideration of immunomodulatory therapies for disease modification and prevention.This study was co-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre; the Wellcome Trust (103838); the Medical Research Council (MR/P01271X/1); a Cambridge Trust & Sidney Sussex College Scholarship; and the Cambridge Centre for Parkinson-Plus. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care

Are Co-Morbidities Associated with Guideline Adherence? The MI-Plus Study of Medicare Patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The impact of co-morbid illnesses on adherence to guideline recommendations in chronic illness is of growing concern. We tested a framework [Piette and Kerr, Diabetes Care. 29(3):725-31, 2006] of provider adherence to guidelines in the presence of co-morbid conditions, which suggests that the effect of co-morbid conditions depends on treatment recommendations for the co-morbid conditions and how symptomatic they are. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory analysis to assess the framework using chart audit data for 1,240 post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) Medicare beneficiaries in Alabama. We assessed level of guideline-adherent post-AMI care from chart-based quality indicators and constructed scores reflecting how much care for the co-morbid condition was similar to post-AMI care (concordance) and how symptomatic the co-morbid condition is, based on expert opinion. RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 74 years, mean co-morbidities of 2, and 61% were white. Both concordance and symptomatic scores were positively associated with guideline compliance, with correlations of 0.32 and 0.14, respectively (p \u3c 0.001 for each). We found positive correlations between highly concordant co-morbid conditions and post-AMI quality scores and negative correlations between highly symptomatic conditions and post-AMI quality scores; both findings support the framework. However, the framework performed less well for conditions that were not highly concordant or highly symptomatic, and the magnitudes of the associations were not large. CONCLUSIONS: The framework was related to the association of co-morbid conditions with adherence by providers to guideline-recommended treatment for post-AMI patients. The framework holds promise for evaluating and possibly predicting guideline adherence