15 research outputs found
Unraveling the Mechanisms of Isoprenoid Biosynthetic Enzymes: Mechanistic Studies of the Early Stage Enzymes
Isoprenoids (or terpenoids) are a large and structurally diverse class of biomolecules that are essential for the survival of all forms of life. Despite the vast differences in their final structures and functions, the early steps of isoprenoid biosynthesis in all organisms follow one
of only two known biosynthetic pathways: the mevalonate pathway or the methyl erythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway. Interestingly, while humans utilize the mevalonate pathway, many human pathogens rely exclusively on the MEP pathway for the biosynthesis of their isoprenoid compounds. This has
led to a number of mechanistic studies of the MEP-specific pathway enzymes, with the ultimate goal of developing small molecule inhibitors as potential drugs. In addition to their therapeutic value, many of the MEP pathway enzymes also catalyze unusual chemical transformations that are not
well understood. In this review, we will highlight the recent work by us and others towards the elucidation of the catalytic mechanisms of several key enzymes involved in the early stages of isoprenoid biosynthesis. These include 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR) and 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate
reductase (IspH) of the MEP pathway, and the type II isopentenyl diphosphate:dimethylallyl diphosphate isomerase (IDI-2) from Staphylococcus aureus. The functions of these enzymes are validated or identified as potential drug targets
A Price To Pay for Relaxed Substrate Specificity: A Comparative Kinetic Analysis of the Class II Lanthipeptide Synthetases ProcM and HalM2
Lanthipeptides
are a class of <u>ri</u>bosomally
synthesized and <u>p</u>osttranslationally modified <u>p</u>eptide natural products (RiPPs) that typically harbor
multiple intramolecular thioether linkages. For class II lanthipeptides,
these cross-links are installed in a multistep reaction pathway by
a single enzyme (LanM). The multifunctional nature of LanMs and the
manipulability of their genetically encoded peptide substrates (LanAs)
make LanM/LanA systems promising targets for the engineering of new
antibacterial compounds. Here, we report the development of a semiquantitative
mass spectrometry-based assay for kinetic characterization of LanM-catalyzed
reactions. The assay was used to conduct a comparative kinetic analysis
of two LanM enzymes (HalM2 and ProcM) that exhibit drastically different
substrate selectivity. Numerical simulation of the kinetic data was
used to develop models for the multistep HalM2- and ProcM-catalyzed
reactions. These models illustrate that HalM2 and ProcM have markedly
different catalytic efficiencies for the various reactions they catalyze.
HalM2, which is responsible for the biosynthesis of a single compound
(the Halβ subunit of the lantibiotic haloduracin), catalyzes
reactions with higher catalytic efficiency than ProcM, which modifies
29 different ProcA precursor peptides during prochlorosin biosynthesis.
In particular, the rates of thioether ring formation are drastically
reduced in ProcM, likely because this enzyme is charged with installing
a variety of lanthipeptide ring architectures in its prochlorosin
products. Thus, ProcM appears to pay a kinetic price for its relaxed
substrate specificity. In addition, our kinetic models suggest that
conformational sampling of the LanM/LanA Michaelis complex could play
an important role in the kinetics of LanA maturation
Leader Peptide Establishes Dehydration Order, Promotes Efficiency, and Ensures Fidelity During Lacticin 481 Biosynthesis
The mechanisms by which lanthipeptide
synthetases control the order
in which they catalyze multiple chemical processes are poorly understood.
The lacticin 481 synthetase (LctM) cleaves eight chemical bonds and
forms six new chemical bonds in a controlled and ordered process.
Two general mechanisms have been suggested for the temporal and spatial
control of these transformations. In the spatial positioning model,
leader peptide binding promotes certain reactions by establishing
the spatial orientation of the substrate peptide relative to the synthetase
active sites. In the intermediate structure model, the LctM-catalyzed
dehydration and cyclization reactions that occur in two distinct active
sites orchestrate the overall process by imparting a specific structure
into the maturing peptide that facilitates the ensuing reaction. Using
isotopically labeled LctA analogues with engineered lacticin 481 biosynthetic
machinery and mass spectrometry analysis, we show here that the LctA
leader peptide plays critical roles in establishing the modification
order and enhancing the catalytic efficiency and fidelity of the synthetase.
The data are most consistent with a mechanistic model for LctM where
both spatial positioning and intermediate structure contribute to
efficient biosynthesis
Discovery and Characterization of 2‑Acylaminoimidazole Microsomal Prostaglandin E Synthase‑1 Inhibitors
As part of a program aimed at the
discovery of antinociceptive
therapy for inflammatory conditions, a screening hit was found to
inhibit microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (<i>m</i>PGES-1)
with an IC<sub>50</sub> of 17.4 μM. Structural information was
used to improve enzyme potency by over 1000-fold. Addition of an appropriate
substituent alleviated time-dependent cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4)
inhibition. Further structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies
led to <b>8</b>, which had desirable potency (IC<sub>50</sub> = 12 nM in an <i>ex vivo</i> human whole blood (HWB) assay)
and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties.
Studies on the formulation of <b>8</b> identified <b>8·H</b><sub><b>3</b></sub><b>PO</b><sub><b>4</b></sub> as suitable for clinical development. Omission of a lipophilic portion
of the compound led to <b>26</b>, a readily orally bioavailable
inhibitor with potency in HWB comparable to celecoxib. Furthermore, <b>26</b> was selective for <i>m</i>PGES-1 inhibition versus
other mechanisms in the prostanoid pathway. These factors led to the
selection of <b>26</b> as a second clinical candidate