15 research outputs found

    Unraveling the Mechanisms of Isoprenoid Biosynthetic Enzymes: Mechanistic Studies of the Early Stage Enzymes

    Get PDF
    Isoprenoids (or terpenoids) are a large and structurally diverse class of biomolecules that are essential for the survival of all forms of life. Despite the vast differences in their final structures and functions, the early steps of isoprenoid biosynthesis in all organisms follow one of only two known biosynthetic pathways: the mevalonate pathway or the methyl erythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway. Interestingly, while humans utilize the mevalonate pathway, many human pathogens rely exclusively on the MEP pathway for the biosynthesis of their isoprenoid compounds. This has led to a number of mechanistic studies of the MEP-specific pathway enzymes, with the ultimate goal of developing small molecule inhibitors as potential drugs. In addition to their therapeutic value, many of the MEP pathway enzymes also catalyze unusual chemical transformations that are not well understood. In this review, we will highlight the recent work by us and others towards the elucidation of the catalytic mechanisms of several key enzymes involved in the early stages of isoprenoid biosynthesis. These include 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR) and 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate reductase (IspH) of the MEP pathway, and the type II isopentenyl diphosphate:dimethylallyl diphosphate isomerase (IDI-2) from Staphylococcus aureus. The functions of these enzymes are validated or identified as potential drug targets

    A Price To Pay for Relaxed Substrate Specificity: A Comparative Kinetic Analysis of the Class II Lanthipeptide Synthetases ProcM and HalM2

    No full text
    Lanthipeptides are a class of <u>ri</u>bosomally synthesized and <u>p</u>osttranslationally modified <u>p</u>eptide natural products (RiPPs) that typically harbor multiple intramolecular thioether linkages. For class II lanthipeptides, these cross-links are installed in a multistep reaction pathway by a single enzyme (LanM). The multifunctional nature of LanMs and the manipulability of their genetically encoded peptide substrates (LanAs) make LanM/LanA systems promising targets for the engineering of new antibacterial compounds. Here, we report the development of a semiquantitative mass spectrometry-based assay for kinetic characterization of LanM-catalyzed reactions. The assay was used to conduct a comparative kinetic analysis of two LanM enzymes (HalM2 and ProcM) that exhibit drastically different substrate selectivity. Numerical simulation of the kinetic data was used to develop models for the multistep HalM2- and ProcM-catalyzed reactions. These models illustrate that HalM2 and ProcM have markedly different catalytic efficiencies for the various reactions they catalyze. HalM2, which is responsible for the biosynthesis of a single compound (the Halβ subunit of the lantibiotic haloduracin), catalyzes reactions with higher catalytic efficiency than ProcM, which modifies 29 different ProcA precursor peptides during prochlorosin biosynthesis. In particular, the rates of thioether ring formation are drastically reduced in ProcM, likely because this enzyme is charged with installing a variety of lanthipeptide ring architectures in its prochlorosin products. Thus, ProcM appears to pay a kinetic price for its relaxed substrate specificity. In addition, our kinetic models suggest that conformational sampling of the LanM/LanA Michaelis complex could play an important role in the kinetics of LanA maturation

    Leader Peptide Establishes Dehydration Order, Promotes Efficiency, and Ensures Fidelity During Lacticin 481 Biosynthesis

    No full text
    The mechanisms by which lanthipeptide synthetases control the order in which they catalyze multiple chemical processes are poorly understood. The lacticin 481 synthetase (LctM) cleaves eight chemical bonds and forms six new chemical bonds in a controlled and ordered process. Two general mechanisms have been suggested for the temporal and spatial control of these transformations. In the spatial positioning model, leader peptide binding promotes certain reactions by establishing the spatial orientation of the substrate peptide relative to the synthetase active sites. In the intermediate structure model, the LctM-catalyzed dehydration and cyclization reactions that occur in two distinct active sites orchestrate the overall process by imparting a specific structure into the maturing peptide that facilitates the ensuing reaction. Using isotopically labeled LctA analogues with engineered lacticin 481 biosynthetic machinery and mass spectrometry analysis, we show here that the LctA leader peptide plays critical roles in establishing the modification order and enhancing the catalytic efficiency and fidelity of the synthetase. The data are most consistent with a mechanistic model for LctM where both spatial positioning and intermediate structure contribute to efficient biosynthesis

    Discovery and Characterization of 2‑Acylaminoimidazole Microsomal Prostaglandin E Synthase‑1 Inhibitors

    No full text
    As part of a program aimed at the discovery of antinociceptive therapy for inflammatory conditions, a screening hit was found to inhibit microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (<i>m</i>PGES-1) with an IC<sub>50</sub> of 17.4 μM. Structural information was used to improve enzyme potency by over 1000-fold. Addition of an appropriate substituent alleviated time-dependent cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibition. Further structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies led to <b>8</b>, which had desirable potency (IC<sub>50</sub> = 12 nM in an <i>ex vivo</i> human whole blood (HWB) assay) and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties. Studies on the formulation of <b>8</b> identified <b>8·H</b><sub><b>3</b></sub><b>PO</b><sub><b>4</b></sub> as suitable for clinical development. Omission of a lipophilic portion of the compound led to <b>26</b>, a readily orally bioavailable inhibitor with potency in HWB comparable to celecoxib. Furthermore, <b>26</b> was selective for <i>m</i>PGES-1 inhibition versus other mechanisms in the prostanoid pathway. These factors led to the selection of <b>26</b> as a second clinical candidate
    corecore