Concentrations of OXF, FBZSO₂ and mean concentrations of ALBSO (± SD, <i>n</i> = 3) measured in living <i>Trichuris suis</i> (black columns) and <i>Oesophagostomum dentatum</i> (hatched columns) after incubation in 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 or 30 µM FBZ (upper three graphs) or ALB (lower two graphs) for 24 and 72 hours.

<p>Concentrations of OXF, FBZSO₂ and mean concentrations of ALBSO (± SD, <i>n</i> = 3) measured in living <i>Trichuris suis</i> (black columns) and <i>Oesophagostomum dentatum</i> (hatched columns) after incubation in 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 or 30 µM FBZ (upper three graphs) or ALB (lower two graphs) for 24 and 72 hours.</p

Non- specific binding of FBZ and ALB accumulated inside living <i>Trichuris suis</i> (dark gray circle) and <i>Oesophagostomum dentatum</i> (light gray triangle) after incubation in 0.01, 0.1, 1,10 or 30 µM FBZ or ALB for 24 and 72 hours.

<p>Mean concentrations (pmol/mg dry worm tissue) of ALB (± SD, <i>n</i> = 3) are shown, while the values of FBZ represents one sample only for each concentration at 24 and 72 hours, respectively.</p

Mean relative motility (± SD, <i>n</i> = 21) and a tendency line for <i>Trichuris suis</i> (dark gray circle) and <i>Oesophagostomum dentatum</i> (light gray triangle) after exposure to FBZ, ALB, and LEV for 24 and 72 hours.

<p>Mean relative motility (± SD, <i>n</i> = 21) and a tendency line for <i>Trichuris suis</i> (dark gray circle) and <i>Oesophagostomum dentatum</i> (light gray triangle) after exposure to FBZ, ALB, and LEV for 24 and 72 hours.</p

Mean concentration (± SD, <i>n</i> = 3, each replicate consist of 30 worms) of a) FBZ, OXF and FBZSO₂, b) ALB, ALBSO and ALBSO₂ and c) LEV measured in living and killed <i>Trichuris suis</i> and <i>Oesophagostomum dentatum</i> after incubation for 24 hours in 10 µM of each of the parent compound.

<p>Significant difference in total concentration (parent compound+metabolites) between species is indicated with *, significant difference within the species (living and killed) is indicated with ▵. <i>P</i>-values were obtained using Student's t-test with variance heterogeneity. *<i>P</i><0.05 and **<i>P</i><0.01 and ^▵<i>P</i><0.05 and ^▵▵<i>P</i><0.01.</p

Red Knot VHF tracking data

Please read the README file for details

AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay; Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America; Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic from Body condition explains migratory performance of a long-distance migrant

Table S1. AICc comparison of the statistical model for arrival in James Bay. The top 5 models are displayed, with the best model in boldface. Timing of arrival in James Bay is the response variable in all models. Departure refers to the last detection of an individual in Delaware Bay and tailwind refers to the tailwind the first 3h of the trajectory.; Fig S1. Locations of groupings of automated telemetry receivers in North America (see main text for details). The white dot indicates the capture site of Delaware Bay and the grey dot represents James Bay, located at the southern edge of the breeding grounds. The red dots indicate the fall detection sites of the Mingan Archipelago the Bay of Fundy. Maps created using R 3.3.3 using packages ggplot2, ggmap, raster and RgoogleMaps (image data providers: US Dept. of State Geographer © 2016); Fig S2. Estimates of the relationship between residual mass (relative body condition) and arrival dates to the sub-Arctic. Birds in a higher condition at the stopover site arrive earlier at the breeding grounds. Data points are estimates of linear mixed models (see main text for details), and the gray area represents 95% confidence intervals