Effectiveness of mobilisation of the upper cervical region and craniocervical flexor training on orofacial pain, mandibular function and headache in women with TMD. A randomised, controlled trial

Background: Studies exploring interventions targeting the cervical spine to improve symptoms in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are limited. Objectives: To determine whether mobilisation of the upper cervical region and craniocervical flexor training decreased orofacial pain, increased mandibular function and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) of the masticatory muscles and decreased headache impact in women with TMD when compared to no intervention. Methods: In a single‐blind randomised controlled trial, 61 women with TMD were randomised into an intervention group (IG) and a control group (CG). The IG received upper cervical mobilisations and neck motor control and stabilisation exercises for 5 weeks. The CG received no treatment. Outcomes were collected by a blind rater at baseline and 5‐week follow‐up. Orofacial pain intensity was collected once a week. A mixed ANOVA and Cohen's d were used to determine differences within/between groups and effect sizes. Results: Pain intensity showed significant time‐by‐group interaction (P 0.8). The decrease in orofacial pain over time was clinically relevant only in the IG. Change in headache impact was significantly different between groups, and the IG showed a clinically relevant decrease after the treatment. No effects were found for PPT or mandibular function. Conclusion: Women with TMD reported a significant decrease in orofacial pain and headache impact after 5 weeks of treatment aimed at the upper cervical spine compared to a CG

Corrigendum to “Effects of physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders on headache pain intensity: A systematic review” (Musculoskeletal Science and Practice (2020) 50, (102277), (S2468781220305828), (10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102277))

© 2021 The Author(s)The authors regret that the original paper had some omissions, and are thankful for the opportunity to present corrections in this corrigendum. The conclusion in the abstract and paper should state that physical therapy interventions presented a small, but not significant, effect on reducing headache pain intensity in subjects with TMD, with a low level of certainty. Secondly, the Risk of Bias figures were not matching the text, and therefore should be replaced by the correct figures as below: Fig. 2. Risk of Bias graph (corrected

Reply to ‘letter to the editor concerning ‘effects of physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders on headache pain intensity: A systematic review’ by Castien & Scholten-Peeters

Contains fulltext : 235057.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)01 juni 202

Effects of physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders on headache pain intensity: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Physical therapy is regarded an effective treatment for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Patients with TMD often report concomitant headache. There is, however, no overview of the effect of physical therapy for TMD on concomitant headache complaints. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the literature on the effectiveness of physical therapy on concomitant headache pain intensity in patients with TMD. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane and PEDro were searched. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized or controlled clinical trials studying physical therapy interventions were included. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with TMD and headache. APPRAISAL: The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. SYNTHESIS METHODS: Individual and pooled between-group effect sizes were calculated according to the standardized mean difference (SMD) and the quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: and manual therapy on both orofacial region and cervical spine. There is a very low level of certainty that TMD-treatment is effective on headache pain intensity, downgraded by high risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision. LIMITATIONS: The methodological quality of most included articles was poor, and the interventions included were very different. CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapy interventions presented small effect on reducing headache pain intensity on subjects with TMD, with low level of certainty. More studies of higher methodological quality are needed so better conclusions could be taken

Is the Course of Headache Complaints Related to the Course of Orofacial Pain and Disability in Patients Treated for Temporomandibular Pain? An Observational Study

Migraine, tension-type headache (TTH) and headaches attributed to temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are prevalent in patients with TMD-pain. The objective was to describe the course of headache complaints as compared to the course of TMD complaints in TMD-pain patients with headache during usual care multidisciplinary treatment for TMD. This was a 12-week longitudinal observational study following adults with TMD-pain and headache during a usual-care multidisci-plinary TMD-treatment. The Graded Chronic Pain Scale was used for both TMD and headache to measure pain-related disability (primary outcome measure), pain intensity, days with pain and days experiencing disability (secondary outcome measures). Stratified for the headache type, general linear modelling for repeated measures was used to analyze changes over time in the TMD complaints and the headache complaints. TMD-pain patients with migraine (n = 22) showed significant decrease of pain-related disability for both TMD and headache complaints over time. No difference in the effect over time was found between the two complaints. Patients with TMD-pain and TTH (n = 21) or headache attributed to TMD (n = 17) did not improve in disability over time. For the secondary outcome measures, the results were equivocal. In conclusion, TMD-pain patients with migraine, improvement in TMD-related disability was comparable to headache-related disability for TMD-pain patients with TTH or with headache attributed to TMD, no improvements in disability were found