The role of virulence factors in the outcome of staphylococcal peritonitis in CAPD patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Peritonitis continues to be the most frequent cause of peritoneal dialysis (PD) failure, with an important impact on patient mortality. Gram-positive cocci such as <it>Staphylococcus epidermidis</it>, other coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), and <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>are the most frequent etiological agents of PD-associated peritonitis worldwide. The objective of the present study was to compare peritonitis caused by <it>S. aureus </it>and CoNS and to evaluate the factors influencing outcome.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Records of 86 new episodes of staphylococcal peritonitis that occurred between 1996 and 2000 in the Dialysis unit of a single university hospital were studied (35 due to <it>S. aureus</it>, 24 to <it>S. epidermidis </it>and 27 to other CoNS). The production of slime, lipase, lecithinase, nuclease (DNAse), thermonuclease (TNAse), α- and β-hemolysin, enterotoxins (SEA, SEB, SEC, SED) and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) was studied in <it>S. aureus </it>and CoNS. Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated based on the minimal inhibitory concentration determined by the E-test. Outcome predictors were evaluated by two logistic regression models.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The oxacillin susceptibility rate was 85.7% for <it>S. aureus</it>, 41.6% for <it>S. epidermidis</it>, and 51.8% for other CoNS (p = 0.001). Production of toxins and enzymes, except for enterotoxin A and α-hemolysin, was associated with <it>S. aureus </it>episodes (p < 0.001), whereas slime production was positive in 23.5% of CoNS and 8.6% of <it>S. aureus </it>strains (p = 0.0047). The first model did not include enzymes and toxins due to their association with <it>S. aureus</it>. The odds of resolution were 9.5 times higher for <it>S. epidermidis </it>than for <it>S. aureus </it>(p = 0.02) episodes, and were similar for <it>S. epidermidis </it>and other CoNS (p = 0.8). The resolution odds were 68 times higher for non-slime producers (p = 0.001) and were not influenced by oxacillin resistance among vancomycin-treated cases (p = 0.89). In the second model, the resolution rate was similar for <it>S. aureus </it>and <it>S. epidermidis </it>(p = 0.70), and slime (p = 0.001) and α-hemolysin (p = 0.04) production were independent predictors of non-resolution.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Bacterial species and virulence factors rather than antibiotic resistance influence the outcome of staphylococcal peritonitis.</p

Public servants and regulator capture in energy and environmental governance

The rapid pace of change, uncertainty, and social contest associated with emerging regulatory spaces create challenges for public servants. In particular, their capacity to act in the public interest may be constrained as contesting interests vie for influence in nascent regulatory environs. This chapter explores these issues and the potential for regulatory capture in the context of unconventional gas and its regulation. Empirically based case studies of regulators in Texas and Colorado in the USA and Queensland, Australia, are relied on. The existing regulatory frameworks governing unconventional gas in each state are considered to enable a thorough examination of the landscape of which public servants and their regulatory agencies are a part. The chapter demonstrates that the speed at which unconventional gas exploration is taking place creates challenges for public servants and regulatory agencies, as laws may not be aligned to practice. The chapter draws on its findings to reflect on the specific regulatory practices that are needed to ensure the accountability and legitimacy of the public sector in such contested spaces, including reforming state regulatory systems and pursuing alternative governance pathways in which relationships between industry, government, and society might be reconfigured