Systematic selection of a dose metric for metal-based nanoparticles.

Mass is traditionally the unique measure of the administered dose in toxicity studies with conventional chemical substances. Because of the variety of specific physical properties of nanoparticles, other dose metrics such as the number of particles, their size, shape, surface area or volume may be more appropriate. Here we applied a systematic, unbiased approach to derive the most appropriate dose metric for nanoparticles from experimental data. The approach was exemplified for copper, zinc oxide, and silver nanoparticles with different diameters, coatings and shapes, combining experiments with six aquatic organisms, two mammalian and two piscine liver cell lines from different research groups. The nanoparticle diameter appeared to be a powerful estimator of metal oxide nanoparticle effects. Since effect concentrations were related to size to the power 3, it is indicated that volume (mass) is the appropriate dose metric for all tested species and toxicological endpoints and all tested metal oxide nanoparticles within the tested size range (25–500 nm). The new method enables extrapolation of test results from one type of metal oxide nanomaterial to another, thereby offering a powerful tool to improved efficiency in risk research and risk assessment of nanomaterials.Environmental Biolog

Minimum information reporting on bio-nano experimental literature

Studying the interactions between nanoengineered materials and biological systems plays a vital role in the development of biological applications of nanotechnology and the improvement of our fundamental understanding of the bio–nano interface. A significant barrier to progress in this multidisciplinary area is the variability of published literature with regards to characterizations performed and experimental details reported. Here, we suggest a ‘minimum information standard’ for experimental literature investigating bio–nano interactions. This standard consists of specific components to be reported, divided into three categories: material characterization, biological characterization and details of experimental protocols. Our intention is for these proposed standards to improve reproducibility, increase quantitative comparisons of bio–nano materials, and facilitate meta analyses and in silico modelling