Creative or Not? Hierarchical Diffusion Modeling of the Creative Evaluation Process

When producing creative ideas (i.e., ideas that are original and useful) two main processes occur: ideation, where people brainstorm ideas, and evaluation, where they decide if the ideas are creative or not. While much is known about the ideation phase, the cognitive processes involved in creativity evaluation are less clear. In this article, we present a novel modeling approach for the evaluation phase of creativity. We apply the drift diffusion model (DDM) to the Creative-or-Not task (CON-task) to study the cognitive basis of evaluation and to examine individual differences in the extent to which people take originality and utility into account when evaluating creative ideas. The CON-task is a timed decision-making task where participants indicate whether they find uses for certain objects creative or not (e.g., using a book as a buoy). The different uses vary on the two creativity dimensions “originality” and “utility.” In two studies (n = 293, 17,806 trials; n = 152, 9,291 trials), we found that stimulus originality was strongly related to participants’ drift rates but found only weak evidence for an association between stimulus utility and the drift rate. However, participants differed substantially in the effects of originality and utility. Furthermore, the implicit weights assigned to originality and utility on the CON-task were associated with self-reported importance ratings of originality and utility and with divergent thinking performance in the Alternative Uses task (AUT). This research provides a cognitive modeling approach to creativity evaluation and underlines the importance of communicating rating criteria in divergent thinking tasks to ensure a fair assessment of creative ability.</p

Puzzling with potential : dynamic testing of analogical reasoning in children

Assessment procedures are frequent in children's school careers; however, measuring potential for learning has remained a puzzle. Dynamic testing is a method to assess cognitive potential that includes training in the assessment process. The goal of this thesis project was to develop a new dynamic test of analogical reasoning for school children. The main aims were to (1) investigate factors that influence children’s differences in performance and change during dynamic testing and (2) examine the predictive value of dynamic measures on children’s school performance. Children showed great variation in cognitive potential. Higher ability children generally required less training and showed greater transfer to other problem sets. Yet, lower ability children tended to improve more during dynamic testing. Performance change during testing appears to be a unique predictor of math and reading achievement, but was unrelated to working memory or cultural background, providing evidence that this may be a separate construct important in the assessment of cognitive potential – especially in culturally diverse schools. This performance change measure, often criticized within classical test theory, has demonstrated its worth when estimated using item response theory models and will hopefully find its place again among the valuable measurement outcomes of children’s potential for learning.LEI Universiteit LeidenDevelopmental pathways of social-emotional and cognitive functioning - ou