22 research outputs found
Time of symptom onset and histologic findings in bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis: new findings on useful correlations
The aim was to find out whether a correlation exists between denudation of urothelium and time of symptom onset in patients with bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC), and to search a correlation between impact of symptoms evaluated with ICSI-ICPI and the presence of comorbid conditions associated with BPS/IC. Ninety-seven consecutive patients underwent cystoscopy under general anesthesia to classify those cases suspected of being affected from BPS/IC. Three cold bladder biopsies were taken including detrusor muscle. Statistical analysis showed significant correlation between IC/BPS duration and the presence of Hunner's lesions (P<0.023). Hunner's lesion with cystoscopy and histological evidence of urothelial denudation with bladder biopsy appear to be items related to IC/BPS duration. Thus an early diagnosis allows to start an appropriate therapeutic approach and prevent a more severe evolution of this multifaceted painful syndrome. Our study shows a correlation between time of symptom onset and evidence of urothelial denudation and with detrusor mast cell count in the whole group of patients. IC/BPS duration seem to correlate with the presence of associated diseases
explorative study on the use of omalizumab in patients suffering from interstitial cystitis bladder pain syndrome
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS), evaluated by visual analogue score for pain and urgency- frequency, O'Leary-Sant IC symptom and problem index questionnaire, Pain Urgency Frequency questionnaire and Patient Global Assessment questionnaire. Four female patients with a diagnosis of IC/BPS were included in the study, with an age between 20 and 39 years. In the first patient the subjective final evaluation was of a marked improvement. The second patient had a moderate improvement of the subjective final evaluation. The third patient considered her overall clinical situation to have slightly improved after treatment. One 32-year-old patient, with multiple allergies, discontinued treatment after 3 months and could not complete the study due to side effects. Omalizumab was subcutaneously administered to patients with IC/PBS; it induced both a subjective and objective improvement of symptoms in 2 patients enrolled in the study
Epidemiology, molecular epidemiology, and risk factors for renal cell carcinoma
Despite only accounting for approximately 2% of all new primary cancer cases, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) incidence has dramatically increased over time. Incidence rates vary greatly according to geographic areas, so that it is extremely likely that exogenous risk factors could play an important role in the development of this cancer. Several risk factors have been linked with RCC, including cigarette smoking, obesity, hypertension (and antihypertensive drugs), chronic kidney diseases (also dialysis and transplantation), as well as the use of certain analgesics. Furthermore, although RCC has not generally been considered an occupational cancer, several types of occupationally-derived exposures have been implicated in its pathogenesis. These include exposure to asbestos, chlorinated solvents, gasoline, diesel exhaust fumes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, printing inks and dyes, cadmium and lead. Finally, families with a predisposition to the development of renal neoplasms were identified and the genes involved discovered and characterized. Therefore, there are now four well-characterized, genetically determined syndromes associated with an increased incidence of kidney tumors, i.e., Von Hippel Lindau (VHL), Hereditary Papillary Renal Carcinoma (HPRC), Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome (BHD), and Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer (HLRCC). This review will address present knowledge about the epidemiology, molecular epidemiology and risk factors of RCC
A retrospective comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer
Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the differences between TRUSguided transrectal prostate biopsy (TR) and transperineal prostate biopsy (TP) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The two biopsy methods were evaluated in terms of diagnostic sensitivity and of early and late complications. Methods: This retrospective study was realized through the review of clinical records of 219 men that received a prostate biopsy between 2004 and 2014. The biopsy was performed because of elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), abnormal digital rectal examination findings (DRE), abnormal transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) findings and symptoms due to prostate diseases. The cohort study was subdivided in two groups: 108 patients received a transrectal biopsy between 2004 and 2006 and 111 received a transperineal biopsy between 2007 and 2014. In both groups, first biopsy was performed with 12 cores scheme whereas second or third biopsy were performed with 18 cores scheme; in this study we excluded patients who underwent to biopsies with different number cores to reduce the bias. Both groups were evaluated on the basis of age, total PSA, PSA ratio (F/T), DRE/TRUS findings, presence/absence of low urinary tracts symptoms (LUTS), presence/absence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), histologic findings of biopsy cores and immediate/postoperative complications. Then, it was evaluated the overall cancer detection rate and the stratified cancer rate on the basis of the previous reported parameters. Finally, we analyzed the early and late complication rate in both groups. U Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the quantitative variables and χ2-test or Fisher exact test for qualitative variables. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 66 cancers were detected in 219 patients of the study; 29 cancers were detected in the TP group and 37 in the TR group. There were no statistically significant differences in the overall cancer rate detected in both groups (26.13% e 34.26% respectively; p = 0.190). However, TP biopsy detected more cancers at first biopsy than TR biopsy (89.7% vs 78.4% respectively; p = 0.021). Moreover, TP biopsy detected more cancers in those patients with low cancer suspect (PSA < 4 ng/ml, F/T > 15%, negative TRUS), instead TR biopsy had more sensitivity in detecting cancer in those patients with high cancer suspect (PSA > 10 ng/ml, F/T < 15%, TRUS with abnormal lesions). The presence of BPH did not influence sensitivity in both cases. There were no significant differences in the early complication rate whereas a statistically significant difference was observed in the late complication rate (4% vs 11% in TP and TR biopsy, respectively; p = 0.019). Conclusions: No statistically significant differences in sensitivity were observed between TP and TR biopsy, but TP biopsy detected more cancers at first time biopsy. Complications rate was lower in the TP group. Therefore, we conclude that the Urologist has the final choice in deciding the most appropriate biopsy technique, considering sensitivity and complications