Aggregating knowledge on tau : Characterising FTDP-17 and related disorders

Heutink, P. [Promotor]Swieten, J.C. van [Copromotor

Hereditary Pick's disease with the G272V tau mutation shows predominant three-repeat tau pathology

Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 have been associated with mutations in the microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT or tau) gene. This disorder is characterized by a large spectrum of neuronal and glial tau lesions in different brain regions. Pick bodies were found in a family with hereditary Pick's disease with the G272V mutation and in several families with other tau mutations in exons 9 and 11-13. The biochemical composition of Pick bodies varies between these mutations. Until recently, no detailed biochemical characterization of G272V brain material was done owing to unavailability of fresh frozen brain material. We now report a detailed study using the immunohistochemistry, western blots and electron microscopy of two brains with the G272V mutation that recently became available. Both brains showed severe neuronal loss in the temporal cortex, whereas in the frontal cortex the loss was less; and abundant Pick bodies in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, and caudate nucleus. The Pick bodies consisted exclusively of three-repeat (3R) isoforms, as was demonstrated by isoform-specific antibodies and supported by western blot analysis of sarkosyl-insoluble tau. These observations confirm that this family diagnosed with hereditary Pick disease meets all the criteria for this condition, including the presence of Pick bodies that are unphosphorylated at Se

Distinct genetic forms of frontotemporal dementia

Background: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the second most common type of presenile dementia and can be distinguished into various clinical variants. The identification of MAPT and GRN defects and the discovery of the TDP-43 protein in FTD have led to the classification of pathologic and genetic subtypes. In addition to these genetic subtypes, there exist familial forms of FTD with unknown genetic defects. Methods: We investigated the frequency, demographic, and clinical data of patients with FTD with a positive family history in our prospective cohort of 364 patients. Genetic analysis of genes associated with FTD was performed on all patients with a positive family history. Immunohistochemical studies were carried out with a panel of antibodies (tau, ubiquitin, TDP-43) in brains collected at autopsy. Results: In the total cohort of 364 patients, 27% had a positive family history suggestive for an autosomal mode of inheritance, including MAPT (11%) and GRN (6%) mutations. We identified a new Gln300X GRN mutation in a patient with a sporadic FTD. The mean age at onset in GRN patients (61.8 +/- 9.9 years) was higher than MAPT patients (52.4 +/- 5.9 years). In the remaining 10% of patients with suggestive autosomal dominant inheritance, the genetic defect has yet to be identified. Neuropathologically, this group can be distinguished into familial FTLD + MND and familial FTLD-U with hippocampal sclerosis. Conclusion: Future genetic studies need to identify genetic defects in at least two distinct familial forms of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with unknown genetic defects: frontotemporal lobe degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions with hippocampal sclerosis and frontotemporal lobe degeneration with motor neuron disease