Is Extended Volume of External Beam Irradiation Beneficial in Post-esophagectomy High Risk Patients Receiving Combined Chemoradiation Therapy?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of extended volume irradiation with anastomotic coverage in high risk resected esophageal cancer patients. METHOD: A retrospective study was undertaken at LRCC from 1989-1999 for high risk resected esophageal cancer patients. Adjuvant treatments consisted of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (epirubicin/fluorouracil/cisplatin or cisplatin/fluorouracil), and local regional irradiation with or without coverage of the anastomotic site. Radiation dose ranged from 45-60Gy at 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction given with initial anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior arrangement with either extended (with anastomotic coverage) or small (without anastomotic coverage) field followed by oblique fields for boost. RESULT: One hundred eighty-eight charts were reviewed. Seventy-two patients were eligible for post-resection chemoradiation therapy. Three patients had disease progression prior to therapy, and 69 patients were analyzed. There were 81% T3N1 and 13% T2N1. Thirty-four patients had margin involvements (radial 53%; proximal/distal 32%), 65% were adenocarcinoma and 33% were squamous carcinoma. Median followup was 23.6 months (3.4 - 78.4 months). Two year survival was 50%; 5yr 24%. Relapse rate was 62.3% and median time to relapse was 20 months. Recurrence locally to anastomosis or adjacent to anastomosis was 9/43(20.9%) with small field and 2/26(7.7%) with extended field. Of 31 patients with relapse outside anastomosis, 14/20(70%) relapsed locoregional/distal when treated with small field and 3/11(27%) relapsed locoregional/distal when treated with extended field (p=0.02). There was no excess treatment interruption or chronic gastrointestinal toxicity with extended field irradiation. CONCLUSION: There is significant decrease in locoregional/distal relapse with use of extended field in high risk resected esophageal cancer patients

Confinement increases the lifetimes of hydroxyapatite precursors

The mineral component of bone is a carbonated, nonstoichiometric hydroxyapatite (calcium phosphate) that forms in nanometer confinement within collagen fibrils, the principal organic constituent of bone. We here employ a model system to study the effects of confinement on hydroxyapatite precipitation from solution under physiological conditions. In common with earlier studies of calcium carbonate and calcium sulfate precipitation, we find that confinement significantly prolongs the lifetime of metastable phases, here amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) and octacalcium phosphate (OCP). The effect occurs at surprisingly large separations of up to 1 μm, and at 0.2 μm the lifetime of ACP is extended by at least an order of magnitude. The soluble additive poly(aspartic acid), which in bulk stabilizes ACP, appears to act synergistically with confinement to give a greatly enhanced stability of ACP. The reason for the extended lifetime appears to be different from that found with CaCO3 and CaSO4, and underscores both the variety of mechanisms whereby confinement affects the growth and transformation of solid phases, and the necessity to study a wide range of crystalline systems to build a full understanding of confinement effects. We suggest that in the case of ACP and OCP the extended lifetime of these metastable phases is chiefly due to a slower transport of ions between a dissolving metastable phase, and the more stable, growing phase. These results highlight the potential importance of confinement on biomineralization processes

Is Extended Volume of External Beam Irradiation Beneficial in Post-esophagectomy High Risk Patients Receiving Combined Chemoradiation Therapy?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of extended volume irradiation with anastomotic coverage in high risk resected esophageal cancer patients. METHOD: A retrospective study was undertaken at LRCC from 1989-1999 for high risk resected esophageal cancer patients. Adjuvant treatments consisted of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (epirubicin/fluorouracil/cisplatin or cisplatin/fluorouracil), and local regional irradiation with or without coverage of the anastomotic site. Radiation dose ranged from 45-60Gy at 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction given with initial anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior arrangement with either extended (with anastomotic coverage) or small (without anastomotic coverage) field followed by oblique fields for boost. RESULT: One hundred eighty-eight charts were reviewed. Seventy-two patients were eligible for post-resection chemoradiation therapy. Three patients had disease progression prior to therapy, and 69 patients were analyzed. There were 81% T3N1 and 13% T2N1. Thirty-four patients had margin involvements (radial 53%; proximal/distal 32%), 65% were adenocarcinoma and 33% were squamous carcinoma. Median followup was 23.6 months (3.4 - 78.4 months). Two year survival was 50%; 5yr 24%. Relapse rate was 62.3% and median time to relapse was 20 months. Recurrence locally to anastomosis or adjacent to anastomosis was 9/43(20.9%) with small field and 2/26(7.7%) with extended field. Of 31 patients with relapse outside anastomosis, 14/20(70%) relapsed locoregional/distal when treated with small field and 3/11(27%) relapsed locoregional/distal when treated with extended field (p=0.02). There was no excess treatment interruption or chronic gastrointestinal toxicity with extended field irradiation. CONCLUSION: There is significant decrease in locoregional/distal relapse with use of extended field in high risk resected esophageal cancer patients

Is Extended Volume of External Beam Irradiation Beneficial in Post-esophagectomy High Risk Patients Receiving Combined Chemoradiation Therapy?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of extended volume irradiation with anastomotic coverage in high risk resected esophageal cancer patients. METHOD: A retrospective study was undertaken at LRCC from 1989-1999 for high risk resected esophageal cancer patients. Adjuvant treatments consisted of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (epirubicin/fluorouracil/cisplatin or cisplatin/fluorouracil), and local regional irradiation with or without coverage of the anastomotic site. Radiation dose ranged from 45-60Gy at 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction given with initial anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior arrangement with either extended (with anastomotic coverage) or small (without anastomotic coverage) field followed by oblique fields for boost. RESULT: One hundred eighty-eight charts were reviewed. Seventy-two patients were eligible for post-resection chemoradiation therapy. Three patients had disease progression prior to therapy, and 69 patients were analyzed. There were 81% T3N1 and 13% T2N1. Thirty-four patients had margin involvements (radial 53%; proximal/distal 32%), 65% were adenocarcinoma and 33% were squamous carcinoma. Median followup was 23.6 months (3.4 - 78.4 months). Two year survival was 50%; 5yr 24%. Relapse rate was 62.3% and median time to relapse was 20 months. Recurrence locally to anastomosis or adjacent to anastomosis was 9/43(20.9%) with small field and 2/26(7.7%) with extended field. Of 31 patients with relapse outside anastomosis, 14/20(70%) relapsed locoregional/distal when treated with small field and 3/11(27%) relapsed locoregional/distal when treated with extended field (p=0.02). There was no excess treatment interruption or chronic gastrointestinal toxicity with extended field irradiation. CONCLUSION: There is significant decrease in locoregional/distal relapse with use of extended field in high risk resected esophageal cancer patients

Human Ring Chromosomes – New Insights for their Clinical Significance

Twenty-nine as yet unreported ring chromosomes were characterized in detail by cytogenetic and molecular techniques. For FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) previously published high resolution approaches such as multicolor banding (MCB), subcentromere-specific multi-color-FISH (cenM-FISH) and two to three-color-FISH applying locus-specific probes were used. Overall, ring chromosome derived from chromosomes 4 (one case), 10 (one case), 13 (five cases), 14, (three cases), 18 (two cases), 21 (eight cases), 22 (three cases), X (five cases) and Y (one case) were studied. Eight cases were detected prenatally, eight due developmental delay and dysmorphic signs, and nine in connection with infertility and/or Turner syndrome. In general, this report together with data from the literature, supports the idea that ring chromosome patients fall into two groups: group one with (severe) clinical signs and symptoms due to the ring chromosome and group two with no obvious clinical problems apart from infertility