Device-specific Outcomes Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

AbstractObjectiveTo compare aneurysm morphology, initial outcomes and mid-term results in patients receiving Talent or Zenith grafts for elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVR).MethodsOver a 6-year time period ending in 2007, 286 patients underwent elective EVR of infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms using Talent or Zenith devices. Patient demographics, aneurysm morphology and initial outcomes (primary-assisted technical success rates, 30-day limb occlusion, re-intervention and mortality) were compared using chi-squared tests or Student's t-tests. Kaplan–Meier curves were calculated to compare cumulative rates of freedom from type I or III endoleak, re-intervention, endograft patency and overall survival over mid-term follow-up.ResultsAdverse aneurysm morphology was more common in patients receiving Zenith stent grafts, with a greater proportion of shorter neck lengths (<10mm, 12.9% vs 0%; p≤0.001) and severe neck angulation (>60°, 25.0% vs 10.3%; p=0.002). Equivalent primary-assisted technical success rates were achieved with both Talent and Zenith grafts (94.0% vs 96.1%; p=0.41). A significant number of adjunctive procedures were required in both groups to obtain a proximal endograft seal, with relatively more procedures performed in the Talent group (28.6% vs 12.4%; p=0.003). Early outcomes were similar for 30-day re-intervention (5.3% vs 3.9%; p=0.91), 30-day limb occlusion (1.5% vs 2.6%; p=0.51), 30-day morbidity (6.8% vs 11.8%; p=0.15) and 30-day mortality (4.5% vs 3.9%; p=0.80).The cumulative incidence of freedom from re-intervention was 88.3±2.9%, 86.1±3.3% and 84.1±3.9% at 1, 2 and 3 years respectively. There were no significant differences between Talent and Zenith groups for re-intervention, type I or III endoleak or limb occlusion rates over the same time period. Overall patient survival was 88.4±2.85% at 1 year, 83.7±4.0% at 2 years and 78.9±5.5% at 3 years.ConclusionsEquivalent primary-assisted technical success rates can be achieved using either Talent or Zenith endografts for endovascular aneurysm repair, but operating teams should be prepared to perform additional adjunctive procedures to obtain a primary proximal seal with either stent. The Zenith endograft performed well in the context of less favourable pre-operative aneurysm morphology. Both Talent and Zenith endografts appeared equally durable in the medium term

Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation of Uterine Fibroids: Medium-Term Follow-Up

Previous studies have shown that radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) of uterine fibroids through a percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided procedure is an effective and safe minimally invasive treatment, with encouraging short-term results. The aim of this study was to assess the results in terms of volume reduction and clinical symptoms improvement in the midterm follow-up of fibroids with a diameter of up to 8 cm. Eleven premenopausal females affected by symptomatic fibroids underwent percutaneous US-guided RFA. Symptom severity and reduction in volume were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The mean symptom score (SSS) before the procedure was 50.30 (range 31.8–67.30), and the average quality of life (QOL) score value was 62 (range 37.20–86.00). The mean basal diameter was 5.5 cm (range 4.4–8) and the mean volume was 101.5 cm3 (range 44.58–278 cm3). The mean follow-up was 9 months (range 3–12 months). The mean SSS value at the end of the follow-up was 13.38 (range 0–67.1) and the QOL 90.4 (range 43.8–100). At follow-up the mean diameter was 3.0 cm (range 1.20–4.5 cm), and the mean volume was 18 cm3 (range 0.90–47.6 cm3). In 10 of 11 patients we obtained total or partial regression of symptoms. In one case the clinical manifestations persisted and it was thus considered unsuccessful. In conclusion, US-guided percutaneous RFA is a safe and effective treatment even for fibroids up to 8 cm

26th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting (CNS*2017): Part 3 - Meeting Abstracts - Antwerp, Belgium. 15–20 July 2017

This work was produced as part of the activities of FAPESP Research,\ud Disseminations and Innovation Center for Neuromathematics (grant\ud 2013/07699-0, S. Paulo Research Foundation). NLK is supported by a\ud FAPESP postdoctoral fellowship (grant 2016/03855-5). ACR is partially\ud supported by a CNPq fellowship (grant 306251/2014-0)