11 research outputs found

    Current perspectives on coronavirus disease 2019 and cardiovascular disease: a white paper by the JAHA editors

    Get PDF
    Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has infected more than 3.0 million people worldwide and killed more than 200,000 as of April 27, 2020. In this White Paper, we address the cardiovascular co‐morbidities of COVID‐19 infection; the diagnosis and treatment of standard cardiovascular conditions during the pandemic; and the diagnosis and treatment of the cardiovascular consequences of COVID‐19 infection. In addition, we will also address various issues related to the safety of healthcare workers and the ethical issues related to patient care in this pandemic

    Malignant Hypertension: Current Perspectives and Challenges

    Get PDF
    Malignant hypertension is a hypertensive emergency, with rapid disease progression and poor prognosis. Although recognized as a separate entity more than a century ago, significant knowledge gaps remain about its pathogenesis and treatment. This narrative review summarizes current viewpoints, research gaps, and challenges with a view to pooling future efforts at improving treatment and prognosis

    Urinary extracellular vesicles: A position paper by the Urine Task Force of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles

    Get PDF
    cited By 0Urine is commonly used for clinical diagnosis and biomedical research. The discovery of extracellular vesicles (EV) in urine opened a new fast-growing scientific field. In the last decade urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) were shown to mirror molecular processes as well as physiological and pathological conditions in kidney, urothelial and prostate tissue. Therefore, several methods to isolate and characterize uEVs have been developed. However, methodological aspects of EV separation and analysis, including normalization of results, need further optimization and standardization to foster scientific advances in uEV research and a subsequent successful translation into clinical practice. This position paper is written by the Urine Task Force of the Rigor and Standardization Subcommittee of ISEV consisting of nephrologists, urologists, cardiologists and biologists with active experience in uEV research. Our aim is to present the state of the art and identify challenges and gaps in current uEV-based analyses for clinical applications. Finally, recommendations for improved rigor, reproducibility and interoperability in uEV research are provided in order to facilitate advances in the field.Peer reviewe

    J Hosp Infect

    No full text
    Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains one of the most common nosocomial pathogens in intensive care units (ICUs). Although exogenous acquisition has been widely documented in outbreaks, its importance is unclear in non-epidemic situations. Aim To elucidate the role of exogenous origin of P. aeruginosa in ICU patients. Methods A chronological analysis of the acquisition of P. aeruginosa was performed using samples collected in 2009 in the DYNAPYO cohort study, during which patients and tap water were screened weekly. Molecular relatedness of P. aeruginosa isolates was investigated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Exogenous acquisition was defined as identification of a P. aeruginosa pulsotype previously isolated from another patient or tap water in the ICU. Findings The DYNAPYO cohort included 1808 patients (10,402 samples) and 233 water taps (4946 samples). Typing of 1515 isolates from 373 patients and 375 isolates from 81 tap water samples identified 296 pulsotypes. Analysis showed exogenous acquisition in 170 (45.6%) of 373 patients. The pulsotype identified had previously been isolated from another patient and from a tap water sample for 86 and 29 patients, respectively. The results differed according to the ICU. Conclusion Exogenous acquisition of P. aeruginosa could be prevented in half of patients. The overall findings of this survey support the need for studies on routes of transmission and risk assessment approach to better define how to control exogenous acquisition in ICUs

    Quelles mesures pour maîtriser le risque infectieux chez les patients immunodéprimés ? Recommandations formalisées d’experts

    No full text
    International audienceThe increase use of immunosuppressive treatments in patients with solid cancer and/or inflammatory diseases requires revisiting our practices for the prevention of infectious risk in the care setting. A review of the literature by a multidisciplinary working group at the beginning of 2014 wished to answer the following 4 questions to improve healthcare immunocompromised patients: (I) How can we define immunocompromised patients with high, intermediate and low infectious risk, (II) which air treatment should be recommended for this specific population? (III) What additional precautions should be recommended for immunocompromised patients at risk for infection? (IV) Which global environmental control should be recommended? Based on data from the literature and using the GRADE method, we propose 15 recommendations that could help to reduce the risk of infection in these exposed populations.L’intensification des traitements immunosuppresseurs et la généralisation de leur utilisation aux patients atteints de cancer solide et/ou de maladies inflammatoires nécessitent de revisiter nos pratiques de prévention du risque infectieux en milieu de soin. Cette révision est justifiée aussi par les modifications de nos pratiques avec une intensification des prises en charge en structures de soins de suites réhabilitation et en ambulatoire. Une revue de la littérature menée par un groupe de travail multidisciplinaire réuni début 2014 a souhaité répondre aux 4 questions suivantes : (i) Quelle définition des patients immunodéprimés à risque infectieux élevé, intermédiaire et faible, (ii) Quel traitement d’air recommander pour les patients immunodéprimés à risque d’infections ? (iii) Quelles précautions complémentaires recommander pour les patients immunodéprimés à risque d’infections ? (iv) Quelle maîtrise globale de l’environnement recommander pour les patients immunodéprimés à risque d’infections ? À partir des données de la littérature et en utilisant la méthode GRADE, nous proposons 15 recommandations qui permettront de réduire le risque infectieux dans ces populations exposées
    corecore