15 research outputs found
Possibilités analytiques de l'Analyse Thermique à Vitesse de transformation ContrÎlée : thermolyse du nitrate d'uranyle hexahydraté
La thermolyse du nitrate d'uranyle hexahydraté sous pression réduite a été effectuée par Analyse Thermique à Vitesse de transformation ContrÎlée, en contrÎlant indépendamment la pression et la vitesse de réaction. Les étapes de la thermolyse sont d'autant mieux séparées que celle-ci est effectuée plus lentement. L'analyse, par spectrométrie de masse, de la phase gazeuse produite pendant la décomposition ainsi que l'analyse par RX des produits formés permettent de montrer que la nature de ceux-ci est trÚs influencée par la pression à laquelle est effectuée la thermolyse. Sous 5.10-2 mbar, le nitrate d'uranyle anhydre formé est transformé en trioxyde d'uranium en une seule étape. Sous 10 mbar, le nitrate d'uranyle anhydre obtenu contient deux phases distinctes et sa dénitration s'effectue en deux étapes. Sous 40 mbar, la dénitration et la déshydratation du nitrate d'uranyle monohydraté se produisent simultanément
Application of the anisotropic RKKY model on the composition dependence of the Neel temperature for U-2(Ni1-xPdx)(2)Sn system
no abstrac
Development of master curves for discriminating the mechanism of solid state reactions from experimental data obtained by using the cyclic and controlled rate thermal analysis
Assuaging death anxiety in older overseas-born Australians of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds hospitalised for end-of-life care
Emerging Ideas. Advancing Family Science Through Public Scholarship: Fostering Community Relationships and Engaging in Broader Impacts
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Monk, J.K., Bordere, T.C. and Benson, J.J. (2021), Emerging Ideas. Advancing Family Science Through Public Scholarship: Fostering Community Relationships and Engaging in Broader Impacts. Fam Relat, 70: 1612-1625. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12545, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12545. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley's version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.Objective: To increase the awareness and support for family scientists' engagement in public scholarship. Background: Without appropriate dissemination efforts, important research findings may remain solely in academic journals and never reach the public. Grounded in a social justice perspective, we argue that family scientists are and should be on the frontlines of direct social change and activities related to broader impacts. Method: In this call-to-action, we articulate the utility and praxis of public scholarship, or the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge for and with communities to create social change for the public good. Results: When engaging in public scholarship, we can build community trust, increase our impact and demonstrate the relevance of family science. Therefore, we offer practical suggestions like collaborating with individuals who serve in complementary roles, hosting a research press conference to disseminate key findings, and writing for local outlets like community newspapers. We also provide insights to help implement (e.g., resources for developing press releases, infographics or visual abstracts) and document (e.g., in promotion and tenure materials) these activities. Conclusion: We encourage scholars to keep these suggestions in mind when trying to think of creative broader impacts activities that illustrate the relevance of research in people's lives. Implications: By shifting academic cultures and engaging in public scholarship, family scholars can increase their reach and contribute to the enfranchisement of marginalized populations, while also enhancing the visibility of findings, building their scholarly networks, and growing public support for family science