16 research outputs found
Preoperative quality of life and surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology patients: A new predictor of operative risk?
Quality of life (QoL) for women with gynecologic malignancies is predictive of chemotherapy related toxicity and overall survival but has not been studied in relation to surgical outcomes and hospital readmissions. Our goal was to evaluate the association between baseline, pre-operative QoL measures and 30-day post-operative morbidity and health resource utilization by gynecologic oncology patients
Muropeptide binding and the X-ray structure of the effector domain of the transcriptional regulator AmpR of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
A complex link exists between cell-wall recycling/repair and the manifestation of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics in many Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This process is mediated by specific cell-wall-derived muropeptide products. These muropeptides are internalized into the cytoplasm and bind to the transcriptional regulator AmpR, which controls the cytoplasmic events that lead to expression of β-lactamase, an antibiotic-resistance determinant. The effector-binding domain (EBD) of AmpR was purified to homogeneity. We document that the EBD exists exclusively as a dimer, even at a concentration as low as 1 μM. The EBD binds to the suppressor ligand UDP-N-acetyl-β-D-muramyl-L-Ala-γ-D-Glu-meso-DAP-D-Ala-D-Ala and binds to two activator muropeptides, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosamine-(1→4)-1,6-anhydro-N-acetyl-β-D-muramyl-L-Ala-γ-D-Glu-meso-DAP-D-Ala-D-Ala and 1,6-anhydro-N-acetyl-β-D-muramyl-L-Ala-γ-D-Glu-meso-DAP-D-Ala-D-Ala, as assessed by non-denaturing mass spectrometry. The EBD does not bind to 1,6-anhydro-N-acetyl-β-D-muramyl-L-Ala-γ-D-Glu-meso-DAP. This binding selectivity revises the dogma in the field. The crystal structure of the EBD dimer was solved to 2.2 Å resolution. The EBD crystallizes in a >closed> conformation, in contrast to the >open> structure required to bind the muropeptides. Structural issues of this ligand recognition are addressed by molecular dynamics simulations, which reveal significant differences among the complexes with the effector molecules.Peer Reviewe
Preoperative quality of life and surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology patients: A new predictor of operative risk?
OBJECTIVE: Quality of life (QoL) for women with gynecologic malignancies is predictive of chemotherapy related toxicity and overall survival but has not been studied in relation to surgical outcomes and hospital readmissions. Our goal was to evaluate the association between baseline, pre-operative QoL measures and 30-day post-operative morbidity and health resource utilization by gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected survey data from an institution-wide cohort study. Patients were enrolled from 8/2012 – 6/2013 and medical records data was abstracted (demographics, comorbid conditions, and operative outcomes). Responses from several validated health-related QoL instruments were collected. Bivariate tests and multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with QoL scores. RESULTS: Of 182 women with suspected gynecologic malignancies, 152 (84%) were surveyed pre-operatively and 148 (81%) underwent surgery. Uterine (94; 63.5%), ovarian (26; 17.5%), cervical (15; 10%), vulvar/vaginal (8; 5.4%), and other (5; 3.4%) cancers were represented. There were 37 (25%) cases of postoperative morbidity (PM), 18 (12%) unplanned ER visits, 9(6%) unplanned clinic visits, and 17 (11.5%) hospital readmissions(HR) within 30 days of surgery. On adjusted analysis, lower functional well-being scores resulted in increased odds of PM (OR 1.07, 95%CI 1.01-.1.21) and HR (OR 1.11, 95%CI 1.03-1.19). A subjective global assessment score was also strongly associated with HR (OR 1.89, 95%CI 1.14, 3.16). CONCLUSION: Lower pre-operative QoL scores are significantly associated with post-operative morbidity and hospital readmission in gynecologic cancer patients. This relationship may be a novel indicator of operative risk