Can the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence be predicted?

Purpose: Pelvic-floor rehabilitation does not provide the same degree of relief in all fecal incontinent patients. We aimed at studying prospectively the ability of tests to predict the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence. Materials and methods: Two hundred fifty consecutive patients (228 women) underwent medical history and a standardized series of tests, including physical examination, anal manometry, pudendal nerve latency testing, anal sensitivity testing, rectal capacity measurement, defecography, endoanal sonography, and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, patients were referred for pelvic-floor rehabilitation. Outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation was quantified by the Vaizey incontinence score. Linear regression analyses were used to identify candidate predictors and to construct a multivariable prediction model for the posttreatment Vaizey score. Results: After pelvic-floor rehabilitation, the mean baseline Vaizey score (18, SD±3) was reduced with 3.2 points (p<0.001). In addition to the baseline Vaizey score, three elements from medical history were significantly associated with the posttreatment Vaizey score (presence of passive incontinence, thin stool consistency, primary repair of a rupture after vaginal delivery at childbed) (R2, 0.18). Th

Avaliação do ângulo ano-retal por meio de defecograma em voluntárias assintomáticas nulíparas e multíparas Measurement of the anorectal angle by defecography in asymptomatic nulliparous and multiparous volunteers

OBJETIVO: Fizemos um protocolo para compararmos as medidas dos ângulos ano-retais em três situações diferentes, em voluntárias assintomáticas nulíparas e multíparas. CASUÍSTICA E MÉTODOS: Foram realizados defecogramas em 30 mulheres (15 nulíparas e 15 multíparas), de maio de 1997 a dezembro de 1998, e obtidas incidências radiográficas em perfil do reto após introdução de contraste baritado texturizado: em repouso, durante contração do músculo puborretal e durante a evacuação. Na análise estatística foi utilizada a análise de medidas repetidas. RESULTADOS: A média do ângulo não apresentou diferença significante entre as voluntárias nulíparas e multíparas. O ângulo mediu, nas nulíparas, 92,9° em repouso, 78,8° durante a contração do músculo puborretal e 117,9° durante a evacuação, e nas multíparas mediu 94,3° em repouso, 79,7° durante a contração do músculo puborretal e 121,4° durante a evacuação. Foi observada diferença significante entre os ângulos em repouso, durante a contração do músculo puborretal e durante a evacuação. CONCLUSÃO: Não houve diferença significante entre os dois grupos examinados.<br>OBJECTIVE: We developed a protocol to compare the measurements of the anorectal angle in nulliparous and multiparous asymptomatic volunteers in three different situations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Defecograms were carried out in 30 women (15 nulliparous and 15 multiparous) from May, 1997 to December, 1998. After rectal administration of texturized barium contrast media, lateral radiographic views of the rectum were obtained at rest, during contraction of the puborectal muscle and during defecation. A repeated measures model was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the mean anorectal angles of nulliparous and multiparous volunteers. Measurements were as follows: 92.9° at rest, 78.8° during the contraction of the puborectal muscle and 117.9° during defecation for the nulliparous volunteers; 94.3° at rest, 79.7° during the contraction of the puborectal muscle and 121.4° during defecation for the multiparous volunteers. A significant difference was observed between the anorectal angle measurements at rest, during contraction of the puborectal muscle and during defecation. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between the anorectal angle measurements of the two groups of volunteers examined