Breast Cancer Risk-reducing Strategies in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

__Abstract__ Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer in women in developed countries. Currently, approximately 14,000 women are diagnosed with BC every year in the Netherlands. One out of eight Dutch women (12%-13%) will develop BC during their life, and 3% to 4% of all Dutch women will die from BC. A genetic predisposition may be responsible for about 5% to 10% of all BC cases. Approximately 25% of these cases can be attributed to a mutation in one of the BReast CAancer (BRCA) genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Both genes act as tumour suppressor genes and are involved in important cell functions, including cell cycle control, gene expression regulation, and DNA repair mechanisms. Cells with deficiencies in genes involved in DNA repair are unable to repair DNA double-strand breaks, resulting in genomic instability and a predisposition to

Toxicity of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer

Treatment with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, as currently given, causes cell damage by induction of double-strand DNA breaks. Because BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins play a role in the repair of DNA damage, the efficacy of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy may be increased in BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer patients. As a downside, acute chemotherapy-related toxicity may also be increased. We selected all female patients who were treated at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for primary or locoregional recurrence of breast cancer (PBC/LR) between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2014. The primary outcome was the relative total dose intensity (RTDI), calculated for anthracyclines and taxanes separately. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of febrile neutropenia, delay in chemotherapy administration, and switch to another chemotherapy regimen due to toxicity. In total, 701 patients treated for PBC/LR were eligible for data analyses, among which 85 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (n = 67 BRCA1 and n = 18 BRCA2). The mean RTDI for anthracyclines was not significantly different between both groups (98.7 % in the BRCA1/2, 96.6 % in the sporadic group, p = 0.27). Also the mean RTDI for taxanes was not significantly different between the groups (93.6 % in the BRCA1/2-associated, 90.0 % in the sporadic group, p = 0.12). Linear regression analysis revealed no significant effect of BRCA1/2 mutation carriership on the RTDIs. No significant differences were found in the percentages of patients presenting with febrile neutropenia, having a delay in chemotherapy administration or switching to an altered chemotherapy regimen. Additionally, the odds ratios showed no significant effect of BRCA1/2 mutation carriership on the secondary outcome variables. (Neo)adjuvant chemotherapy-related toxicity was not different between BRCA1/2-associated and sporadic breast cancer patients suggesting that the DNA damage repair mechanism of non-cancer cells with only one normal copy of either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is sufficiently functional to handle acute chemotherapy-associated toxicity

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, natural menopause, and breast cancer risk:an international prospective cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Background The effect of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) on breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers is uncertain. Retrospective analyses have suggested a protective effect but may be substantially biased. Prospective studies have had limited power, particularly for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Further, previous studies have not considered the effect of RRSO in the context of natural menopause. Methods A multi-centre prospective cohort of 2272 BRCA1 and 1605 BRCA2 mutation carriers was followed for a mean of 5.4 and 4.9 years, respectively; 426 women developed incident breast cancer. RRSO was modelled as a time-dependent covariate in Cox regression, and its effect assessed in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Results There was no association between RRSO and breast cancer for BRCA1 (HR = 1.23; 95% CI 0.94-1.61) or BRCA2 (HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.62-1.24) mutation carriers. For BRCA2 mutation carriers, HRs were 0.68 (95% CI 0.40-1.15) and 1.07 (95% CI 0.69-1.64) for RRSO carried out before or after age 45 years, respectively. The HR for BRCA2 mutation carriers decreased with increasing time since RRSO (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-0.99 for 5 years or longer after RRSO). Estimates for premenopausal women were similar. Conclusion We found no evidence that RRSO reduces breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers. A potentially beneficial effect for BRCA2 mutation carriers was observed, particularly after 5 years following RRSO. These results may inform counselling and management of carriers with respect to RRSO.</p

The impact of menstruation persistence or recovery after chemotherapy on survival in young patients with hormone receptor negative breast cancer

Introduction: Hormone replacement therapy can diminish hormone depletion-related complaints in postmenopausal women, but is contraindicated for postmenopausal breast cancer (BC) patients. Recovery of menstruation after chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in young hormone receptor-negative BC patients however, is accepted. To determine the safety of this strategy, we investigated the effect of recovery of menstruation on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in young hormone receptor-negative BC patients treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We selected 636 patients from a single-center cohort with early stage hormone receptornegative BC and under the age of 50 years when treated with chemotherapy. Sufficient data on course of menstruation in medical records was retrospectively found for 397 patients, of whom 299 patients (75%) had a recovery of menstruation after chemotherapy. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for the effect of recovery of menstruation on DFS and OS. Results: Patients with recovery of menstruation after chemotherapy less frequ

Recurrent postmenopausal bleeding:Pathological findings and predictive factors. A multicenter, prospective, observational study

Introduction: Recurrent postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) occurs in 6%–25% of postmenopausal women who have experienced a previous episode of PMB. The question of whether recurrent PMB leads to a higher risk of endometrial cancer (EC) in comparison to a single episode of PMB is, however, controversial. Furthermore, little is known about predictive factors for recurrent PMB. Material and Methods: A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted over a 5-year period in four hospitals in the Netherlands. Women with PMB undergoing endometrial sampling and aged 40 years and older were included. Occurrence of recurrent PMB was retrospectively determined. Primary outcomes included (1) the incidence of recurrent PMB and (2) differences in pathological findings between patients with a single episode vs recurrent PMB. Secondary outcomes included (1) the association between diagnosis of benign polyps at first PMB and pathological findings at recurrent PMB and (2) factors predictive for recurrent PMB. Results: A total of 437 women with PMB were included, of whom 360 were at risk of recurrent PMB. With a median follow-up of 61 months (IQR (Interquartile range) 44–73), 26.4% experienced recurrent PMB. Patients with recurrent PMB were more often diagnosed with benign polyps (34.7% vs. 25.1%, p-value 0.015) and less frequently with a malignancy (5.3% vs. 17.8%, p-value 0.015), compared to patients with a single episode of PMB. Benign polyps at initial PMB were not associated with a (pre)malignancy at recurrence (OR 4.16, 95% CI 0.75–23.03). Predictive factors for recurrent PMB included use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.64–6.72), and benign polyps at initial PMB (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.07–3.04). Conclusions: Recurrent PMB is common in women with a previous episode of PMB. Compared to patients with a single episode of PMB, patients with recurrent PMB and benign histological outcomes at accurate workup during their first episode were less often diagnosed with malignancies and more frequently with benign polyps. Benign polyps at first PMB are predictive for recurrent PMB, but not for a higher risk of (pre)malignancy.</p

Survival after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy in healthy BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Item does not contain fulltex

The effect of hormone therapy on breast density following risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with an increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of tibolone to conjugated estrogens with medroxyprogesterone-acetate (CEE + MPA) on breast density, as a predictor for breast cancer risk, in women with a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer. METHODS: Women aged 30-50 (N = 114) who had undergone risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) were randomized to tibolone or CEE + MPA. RESULTS: Breast density decreased 46% after RRSO in untreated women, 39% after treatment with tibolone, and 17% after treatment with CEE + MPA; the decrease in breast density after CEE + MPA was significantly different compared with that of untreated women (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: A decline in breast density is seen after premenopausal RRSO despite the use of both CEE + MPA or tibolone, although lower breast density is seen after tibolone use

The effect of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term survival outcomes in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy:A retrospective cohort study

Background: Despite histological and molecular differences between invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive carcinoma of no special type, according to national treatment guidelines no distinction is made regarding the use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Studies on the long-term outcome of chemotherapy in patients with ILC are scarce and show inconclusive results. Methods:All patients with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative ILC with an indication for chemotherapy treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy were selected from the Erasmus Medical Center Breast Cancer database. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of chemotherapy on recurrence-free survival (RFS), breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 520 patients were selected, of whom 379 were treated with chemotherapy and 141 were not. Patients in the chemotherapy group were younger (51 vs. 61 years old; p &lt;.001), had a higher T status (T3+, 33% vs. 14%; p &lt;.001), and more often had lymph node involvement (80% vs. 49%; p &lt;.001) in comparison to the no-chemotherapy group. After adjusting for confounders, chemotherapy treatment was not associated with better RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63–2.31), BCSS (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.60–2.58), or OS (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.56–1.66). This was also reflected by adjusted Cox survival curves in the chemotherapy versus no-chemotherapy group for RFS (75% vs. 79%), BCSS (80% vs. 84%), and OS (72% vs. 71%). Conclusions:Chemotherapy is not associated with improved RFS, BCSS, or OS for patients with ER+/HER2− ILC treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy and with an indication for chemotherapy.</p