Engineered LINE-1 retrotransposition in nondividing human neurons

Half the human genome is made of transposable elements (TEs), whose ongoing activity continues to impact our genome. LINE-1 (or L1) is an autonomous non-LTR retrotransposon in the human genome, comprising 17% of its genomic mass and containing an average of 80-100 active L1s per average genome that provide a source of inter-individual variation. New LINE-1 insertions are thought to accumulate mostly during human embryogenesis. Surprisingly, the activity of L1s can further impact the somatic human brain genome. However, it is currently unknown whether L1 can retrotranspose in other somatic healthy tissues or if L1 mobilization is restricted to neuronal precursor cells (NPCs) in the human brain. Here, we took advantage of an engineered L1 retrotransposition assay to analyze L1 mobilization rates in human mesenchymal (MSCs) and hematopoietic (HSCs) somatic stem cells. Notably, we have observed that L1 expression and engineered retrotransposition is much lower in both MSCs and HSCs when compared to NPCs. Remarkably, we have further demonstrated for the first time that engineered L1s can retrotranspose efficiently in mature nondividing neuronal cells. Thus, these findings suggest that the degree of somatic mosaicism and the impact of L1 retrotransposition in the human brain is likely much higher than previously thought.We thank current members of the J.L.G.-P. laboratory for helpful discussions. We also thank Drs. Geoffrey Faulkner (Mater Research, Australia) and John V. Moran (University of Michigan) for sharing unpublished data and for critical input during the project; Ms. Raquel Marrero (Microscopy Unit, Genyo) for technical support; Simon Mendez-Ferrer (CNIC, Spain) for providing total RNA isolated from human mesenspheres; Dr. Oliver Weichenrieder (Max-Planck, Tubingen, Germany) for providing a polyclonal L1-ORF1p antibody; and Dr. Aurelien Doucet (IRCAN, Nice, France) for providing a plasmid containing an UBC-driven EGFP retrotransposition indicator cassette. J.L.G. was funded by the US Department of Defense, Breast Cancer Research Program (award #BC051386), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1R03NS087290-01), and the ALS Therapy Alliance (2013-F-067). A.M. has been partially funded by a Marie Curie IRG project (FP7-PEOPLE-2007-4-3-IRG: SOMATIC LINE-1). J.L.G.-P's laboratory is supported by CICE-FEDER-P09-CTS-4980, CICE-FEDER-P12-CTS-2256, Plan Nacional de I+D+I 2008–2011 and 2013–2016 (FIS-FEDER-PI11/01489 and FIS-FEDER-PI14/02152), PCIN-2014-115-ERA-NET NEURON II, the European Research Council (ERC-Consolidator ERC-STG-2012-233764), by an International Early Career Scientist grant from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (IECS-55007420), and by The Wellcome Trust–University of Edinburgh Institutional Strategic Support Fund (ISFF2).S

Synthesis and Characterization of Specific Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors for Mammalian LINE-1 Retrotransposons

Retrotransposons are a type of transposable element (TE) that have amplified to astonishing numbers in mammalian genomes, comprising more than a third of the human and mouse genomes. Long interspersed element class 1 (LINE-1 or L1) retrotransposons are abundant and currently active retroelements in the human and mouse genomes. Similarly, long terminal repeat (LTR)-containing retrotransposons are abundant in both genomes, although only active in mice. LTR- and LINE-1-retroelements use different mechanisms for retrotransposition, although both involve the reverse transcription of an intermediate retroelement-derived RNA. Retrotransposon activity continues to effect the germline and somatic genomes, generating interindividual variability over evolution and potentially influencing cancer and brain physiology, respectively. However, relatively little is known about the functional consequences of retrotransposition. In this study, we have synthesized and characterized reverse transcriptase inhibitors specific for mammalian LINE-1 retrotransposons, which might help deciphering the functional impact of retrotransposition in vivo