Recent advances in meningococcal B disease prevention: real-world evidence from 4CMenB vaccination.

Abstract Objectives 4CMenB is a broadly protective vaccine against invasive meningococcal capsular group B disease (MenB IMD). Licensed worldwide based on immunogenicity and safety data, effectiveness and impact data are now available. We comprehensively reviewed all available real-world evidence gathered from use of 4CMenB since licensure. Results Data from 7 countries provide evidence of effectiveness and impact across different healthcare settings and age-groups, including national/regional immunization programs, observational studies and outbreak control. At least 2 4CMenB doses reduced MenB IMD by 50%-100% in 2-month to 20-year-olds depending on length of follow-up. Estimates of vaccine effectiveness in fully vaccinated cohorts ranged from 59%-100%. The safety profile of 4CMenB administered in real-world settings was consistent with pre-licensure clinical trial data. Conclusion MenB IMD is an uncommon but life-threatening disease with unpredictable epidemiology. The substantial body of data demonstrating 4CMenB effectiveness and impact supports its use in IMD prevention. The results reinforce the importance of direct protection of the highest risk groups; infants/young children and adolescents. Direct protection via routine infant immunization with catch-up in young children and routine adolescent vaccination could be the preferred option for MenB disease control. A Video Abstract linked to this article is available on Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14546790

Safety and immunogenicity of two Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines

Objectives. Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) infection remains a major public health problem inthe developing world. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a new PRP-CRM197 conjugate Hib vaccine (Vaxem Hib, Chiron Vacdnes), compared with theHibTITER vaccine (WyethLederle Vaccines), following the World Health Organisation (WHO)'s accelerated schedule which allows 4-week intervals between doses.Study design. A phase II, observer-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority study.Methods. In total, 331 babies were immunised with either Vaxem Hib (N = 167) or HibTITER (N = 164) vaccine at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age, in parallel with oral polio, diphtheriatetanus- pertussis and hepatitis B vaccines. Postimmunisation reactions were recorded after each immunisation and arfollow-up visits. Anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) antibodies were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) before and 1 month after the third immunisation. Results. Overall, there was no significant difference in the anti-PRP levels between the two groups .. One month after the third immunisation, 76% of vacdnees in the Vaxem Hib group and 70% in the HibTITER group hadanti-PRP antibody mres i:: 1.0 vg/ tnl, while 96% of the Vaxem l-Iib group and.90% of the HibTITER gn;mp d.e!l}onstrated a),lt1- PRP antibody titres;:: 0.15 vg/ml. The geometric me<t:ntitre at day 90 was 3.77 pg/ml for the VaxemHib and 3.0 Jlg/Inl for the HibTITER groups. Although the Vaxem Hib vaccine produced more redness (6% versus 1 %; p = 0.006) and swelling (5% versus 1%, p = 0.037), overall it was well tolerated compared with the B:ibTITER vaccine. There wa~ no significant difference in vaccine-relateq elevated temperature (;:: 38°(:) between the two groups (p = 0. 11), Conclusion. Both vaccines showed comparable safety llJ:\d immunogenicity profiles when administered to SouthAfrican babies at 6, 10 and 14weeks of age

MF59®-Adjuvanted H5N1 Vaccine Induces Immunologic Memory and Heterotypic Antibody Responses in Non-Elderly and Elderly Adults

Pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) has the potential to cause a major global pandemic in humans. Safe and effective vaccines that induce immunologic memory and broad heterotypic response are needed.Healthy adults aged 18-60 and > 60 years (n = 313 and n = 173, respectively) were randomized (1:1) to receive two primary and one booster injection of 7.5 microg or 15 microg doses of a subunit MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 (A/Vietnam/1194/2004) (clade 1) vaccine. Safety was monitored until 6 months after booster. Immunogenicity was assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HI), single radial hemolysis (SRH) and microneutralization assays (MN). Mild injection-site pain was the most common adverse reaction. No serious adverse events relating to the vaccine were reported. The humoral immune responses to 7.5 microg and 15 microg doses were comparable. The rates for seroprotection (HI>40; SRH>25 mm(2); MN > or = 40) after the primary vaccination ranged 72-87%. Six months after primary vaccination with the 7.5 microg dose, 18% and 21% of non-elderly and elderly adults were seroprotected; rates increased to 90% and 84%, respectively, after the booster vaccination. In the 15 microg group, seroprotection rates among non-elderly and elderly adults increased from 25% and 62% after primary vaccination to 92% and 88% after booster vaccination, respectively. A heterologous immune response to the H5N1/turkey/Turkey/05 strain was elicited after second and booster vaccinations.Both formulations of MF59-adjuvanted influenza H5N1 vaccine were well tolerated. The European Union requirement for licensure for pre-pandemic vaccines was met by the lower dose tested. The presence of cross-reactive antibodies to a clade 2 heterologous strain demonstrates that this vaccine may be appropriate for pre-pandemic programs.(ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT00311480

Optimizing the timing of 4CMenB vaccination in adolescents and young adults based on immune persistence and booster response data

Introduction: Meningococcal disease has an incidence peak spread over several years during adolescence and young adulthood in the United States. Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccines have been introduced relatively recently and may help protect individuals in these age groups. Currently there is insufficient long-term experience to determine the duration of disease protection after any MenB vaccine. Understanding antibody persistence after primary vaccination and responses to booster can help inform MenB vaccination strategies and optimize disease prevention. Areas covered: Four studies in adolescents/young adults vaccinated with meningococcal B vaccine 4CMenB were reviewed with the aim to compare findings across studies and draw key learnings. The studies varied by geographic location, population characteristics, and timing of antibody measurement relative to primary vaccination. Expert opinion: Antibody persistence data for 4CMenB are substantial, extending 7.5 years post-primary vaccination. Vaccination at age 16–18 years may help protect adolescents throughout their highest age-based risk period. Similar robust responses to a single booster dose were observed 4 and 7.5 years after primary vaccination. In outbreak settings it is beneficial to have received prior vaccination; residual circulating antibodies may provide protection, and a single dose induces booster responses within 7 days, which is quicker than administration of a 2-dose series to vaccine-naïve individuals

A Heterologous MF59-Adjuvanted H5N1 Prepandemic Influenza Booster Vaccine Induces a Robust, Cross-Reactive Immune Response in Adults and the Elderly▿

Immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of an MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine containing 7.5 μg A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005-like (clade 2.2) H5N1 hemagglutinin, given approximately 18 months after primary vaccination with a heterologous strain, were evaluated. The booster vaccine was well tolerated and induced a robust, cross-reactive immune response

Immunogenicity and safety of MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine from infancy to adolescence

7sireservedOBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of a MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine in a population 6 months through 17 years of age. METHODS: Healthy subjects 6 to_36 months, 3 to_9 months, and 9 to_18 years of age were assigned randomly to receive 2 doses of either a MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine (7.5 _g/dose) or a MF59-adjuvanted trivalent seasonal influenza control vaccine (15 _g/dose for each antigen). Immunogenicity against the A/Vietnam/1194/2004-like vaccine strain was measured before and 3 weeks after the 2-dose primary series, through hemagglutination inhibition (HI), single radial hemolysis (SRH), and microneutralization. Local and systemic reactions were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 335 subjects received the H5N1 vaccine, and 137 subjects received the seasonal vaccine. Rates of seroprotection (HI titer of_40) against the H5N1 vaccine antigen were 97% for children 6 to 36 months and 3 to 9 years of age and 89% for older children. All subjects seroconverted in the SRH assay. Microneutralization titers of _40 were achieved by 99% of subjects, and _98% of subjects, respectively. Local reactions, particularly injection site pain in older children, were common, generally mild to moderate in nature, and transient and resolved spontaneously. Up to 5% of participants. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In this pediatric population, MF59-adjuvanted H5N1vaccine was highly immunogenic, had a good safety profile, reactogenicity comparable with that of an adjuvanted seasonal influenza control vaccine. Pediatrics 2010;126:e762–e770mixedVESIKARI, T.; KARVONEN, A.; TILMAN, S.; BORKOWSKI, A.; MONTOMOLI, E.; BANZHOFF, A.; CLEMENS, R.Vesikari, T.; Karvonen, A.; Tilman, S.; Borkowski, A.; Montomoli, E.; Banzhoff, A.; Clemens, R

Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of the purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine manufactured in India and Germany: A randomized, single blind, multicentre, phase IV clinical study

This phase IV, single blind study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of India-manufactured purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine (PCECV), compared with a German-manufactured batch obtained by the same production process. A total of 340 participants enrolled at 2 study sites in India were randomized (1:1:1:1) in 4 groups to receive a 5-dose Essen regimen with either 1 of the 3 Indian batches (PCECV-I) or the German batch (PCECV-G), administered on Days (D) 0, 3, 7, 14 and 30. The lot-to-lot consistency of PCECV-I batches in terms of induced immune response at D14 was demonstrated. The immune response elicited by PCECV-I was shown to be non-inferior to that induced by PCECV-G, as the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the ratio (PCECV-I/PCECV-G) of rabies virus neutralising antibody (RVNA) geometric mean concentrations was higher than 0.5 at D14. At least 96% of participants developed adequate RVNA concentrations (≥ 0.5 IU/mL) by D14 and all achieved RVNA concentrations ≥ 0.5 IU/mL by D90. RVNA levels were comparable across all groups throughout the entire study. Solicited local and general symptoms had a similar incidence in all groups. Unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were reported by 11% of participants. Only 1 serious AE (leg fracture) was reported and was not related to vaccination. No deaths and no rabies cases were recorded during the 90 days of observation. The study showed that the 3 PCECV-I and the PCECV-G batches induced a similar immune response and had a comparable safety profile when administered according to a 5-dose schedule