Rheumatology International / Musculoskeletal ultrasonography in routine rheumatology practice : data from Central and Eastern European countries

The main aim was to gain structured insight into the use of musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) in routine rheumatology practices in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. In a cross-sectional, observational, international, multicenter survey, a questionnaire was sent to investigational sites in CEE countries. Data on all subsequent routine MSUS examinations, site characteristics, MSUS equipment, and investigators were collected over 6 months or up to 100 examinations per center. A total of 95 physicians at 44 sites in 9 countries provided information on a total of 2810 MSUS examinations. The most frequent diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (34.8 and 14.9 % of cases, respectively). Mean number of joints examined was 6.8. MSUS was most frequently performed for diagnostic purposes (58 %), particularly in patients with undifferentiated arthritis, suspected soft tissue disorders, or osteoarthritis (73.085.3 %). In RA patients, 56.3 % of examinations were conducted to monitor disease activity. Nearly all investigations (99 %) had clinical implications, while the results of 78.6 % of examinations (51.699.0 %) were deemed useful for patient education. This first standardized multicountry survey performed in CEEs provided a structured documentation of the routine MSUS use in participating countries. The majority of MSUS examinations were performed for diagnostic purposes, whereas one-third was conducted to monitor disease activity in RA. A majority of examinations had an impact on clinical decision making and were also found to be useful for patient education.(VLID)346787

Prolactin and breast cancer: the need to avoid undertreatment of serious psychiatric illnesses in breast cancer patients: a review

Hyperprolactinemia, defined as a sustained elevation of prolactin (PRL) levels greater than 530 mIU/L in women and greater than 424 mIU/L in men, has been implicated for a long time in breast cancer etiology and prognosis. Elevated PRL values (approximately 2-3 times higher than the reference values) are a common adverse effect of antipsychotic medications, especially with first-generation drugs, and most antipsychotics carry a standard warning regarding PRL elevations on their US product labels. These associations foster undertreatment of serious psychiatric illnesses in both otherwise healthy patients and cancer patients. This review assesses both the preclinical and clinical evidence that has led to the hypothesis of PRL's role in breast cancer risk or breast cancer progression. It is concluded that taken together, the published data are unconvincing and insufficient to deprive cancer patients in general and breast cancer patients specifically of potentially effective antipsychotic or antidepressant medications for serious psychiatric indications. We thus call on revised medication guidelines to avoid the existing undertreatment of serious psychiatric illnesses among cancer patients based on an unproven contraindication to psychiatric medications. Cancer 2016;122:184-188. (c) 2015 American Cancer Society. This review discusses the evidence for a role of hyperprolactinemia in breast cancer risk and prognosis. New guidelines are needed for antipsychotic and antidepressant medications among cancer patients.Avon International Breast Cancer Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MassachusettsGlobal Cancer Institute, Boston, MassachusettsFederal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilCenter for Oncology and Hematology, Wilhelminen Hospital, Vienna, AustriaMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MassachusettsHarvard Medical School, Boston, MassachusettsFederal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

Safety and efficacy of a novel salmon calcitonin (sCT) technology-based oral formulation in healthy postmenopausal women: Acute and 3-month effects on biomarkers of bone turnover

Oral administration of calcitonin could improve compliance to long-term treatment. Efficacy and safety of a novel oral formulation was assessed on 277 postmenopausal women. The results show (1) effective enteral absorption, (2) marked inhibition of bone resorption with minimal alteration of formation, and (3) reproducibility of responses over 3 months. Introduction: We have recently introduced an Eligen technology-based oral formulation of salmon calcitonin (sCT) that effectively delivers the hormone to the circulation. The efficacy and safety during longer-term administration, however. has not been investigated in the target population. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial including 277 healthy postmenopausal women 55-85 years of age. Women received treatment with either daily (0.15, 0.4. 1.0, or 2.5 mg) or intermittent doses (1.0 mg, every other day) of sCT combined with the delivery agent (8-[N-2-hydroxi-5-chloro-benzoyl]-amino-caprylic acid, 200 mg) or placebo for 3 months. All participants received 1000 mg calcium plus 400 IU vitarnin D daily throughout the study. Efficacy parameters were the acute and/or pre-dose changes in serum and urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), N-mid osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSALP), calcium, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) measured by established immunoassays. Results: After the first dose, sCT evoked dose-dependent decreases in serum CTx (-60.8% to -81.8% from baseline) compared with placebo, reaching nadirs 2-3 h after drug intake, after which, gradual increases were observed. The simultaneous acute changes in OC were statistically nonsignificant. Area under the curve (AUC) of serum CTx responses at months 1 and 3 showed strong correlation with those at baseline (both r = 0.78, p < 0.001). At month 3. the placebo-corrected changes in the pre-dose value of serum and urinary CTx were significant only in the 1.0-mg dose group (-18.9% and -20.5%, respectively, p < 0.05). The placebo-corrected change in OC was - 8.6 (p = 0.09), whereas the change in BSALP was -7.3 (p = 0.02). The oral formulation was well tolerated, with mild to moderate gastrointestinal and skin manifestations apparent mainly in the high-dose groups. Conclusion: The results of this 3-month trial show that the novel Eligen technology-based oral formulation of sCT has potential to become a safe and effective treatment for postmenopausal bone loss. Future trials are needed to assess the impact of long-term administration on changes in BMD and fracture risk