Alterations of renal phenotype and gene expression profiles due to protein overload in NOD-related mouse strains

BACKGROUND: Despite multiple causes, Chronic Kidney Disease is commonly associated with proteinuria. A previous study on Non Obese Diabetic mice (NOD), which spontaneously develop type 1 diabetes, described histological and gene expression changes incurred by diabetes in the kidney. Because proteinuria is coincident to diabetes, the effects of proteinuria are difficult to distinguish from those of other factors such as hyperglycemia. Proteinuria can nevertheless be induced in mice by peritoneal injection of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA). To gain more information on the specific effects of proteinuria, this study addresses renal changes in diabetes resistant NOD-related mouse strains (NON and NOD.B10) that were made to develop proteinuria by BSA overload. METHODS: Proteinuria was induced by protein overload on NON and NOD.B10 mouse strains and histology and microarray technology were used to follow the kidney response. The effects of proteinuria were assessed and subsequently compared to changes that were observed in a prior study on NOD diabetic nephropathy. RESULTS: Overload treatment significantly modified the renal phenotype and out of 5760 clones screened, 21 and 7 kidney transcripts were respectively altered in the NON and NOD.B10. Upregulated transcripts encoded signal transduction genes, as well as markers for inflammation (Calmodulin kinase beta). Down-regulated transcripts included FKBP52 which was also down-regulated in diabetic NOD kidney. Comparison of transcripts altered by proteinuria to those altered by diabetes identified mannosidase 2 alpha 1 as being more specifically induced by proteinuria. CONCLUSION: By simulating a component of diabetes, and looking at the global response on mice resistant to the disease, by virtue of a small genetic difference, we were able to identify key factors in disease progression. This suggests the power of this approach in unraveling multifactorial disease processes

Breast cancer stem cells: tools and models to rely on

There is increasing evidence for the "cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis", which holds that cancers are driven by a cellular component that has stem cell properties, including self-renewal, tumorigenicity and multi-lineage differentiation capacity. Researchers and oncologists see in this model an explanation as to why cancer may be so difficult to cure, as well as a promising ground for novel therapeutic strategies. Given the specific stem cell features of self-renewal and differentiation, which drive tumorigenesis and contribute to cellular heterogeneity, each marker and assay designed to isolate and characterize CSCs has to be functionally validated. In this review, we survey tools and markers available or promising to identify breast CSCs. We review the main models used to study breast CSCs and how they challenge the CSC hypothesis

Strong association of a functional polymorphism in the monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 promoter gene with lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). There is evidence that polymorphisms in the genes of inflammatory mediators may predispose to the development of LN in patients with SLE. In this study, we examined the role of a functional monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) polymorphism in SLE and LN. METHODS: DNA and paired urine and serum samples were obtained from 134 SLE patients (> or =4 American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE; 49 with and 85 without LN) and 118 controls. MCP-1 genomic variants were detected by polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction enzyme-fragment analysis. Urinary and serum MCP-1 levels and MCP-1 production by peripheral blood macrophages were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: The A/A genotype was more common in controls than in SLE patients (P = 0.0002), whereas both the A/G (P = 0.009) and G/G (P = 0.0212) genotypes were more frequent in SLE patients. The A/A genotype was observed in only 23% of the patients with LN compared with 58% of those without LN (P < 0.0001). MCP-1 production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with the A/G and G/G phenotypes was markedly higher than the production by cells from patients with the A/A genotype. Urinary levels of MCP-1 were significantly higher in patients with LN. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that an A/G or G/G genotype may predispose to the development of SLE and further indicate that SLE patients with these genotypes may be at higher risk of developing LN. Moreover, measurement of urinary levels of MCP-1 may be a useful tool for the detection and management of LN