EurA1c: the European HbA1c Trial to Investigate the Performance of HbA1c Assays in 2166 Laboratories across 17 Countries and 24 Manufacturers by Use of the IFCC Model for Quality Targets

Background: A major objective of the IFCC Committee on Education and Use of Biomarkers in Diabetes is to generate awareness and improvement of HbA1c assays through evaluation of the performance by countries and manufacturers. Methods: Fresh whole blood and lyophilized hemolysate specimens manufactured from the same pool were used by 17 external quality assessment organizers to evaluate analytical performance of 2166 laboratories. Results were evaluated per country, per manufacturer, and per manufacturer and country combined according to criteria of the IFCC model for quality targets. Results: At the country level with fresh whole blood specimens, 6 countries met the IFCC criterion, 2 did not, and 2 were borderline. With lyophilized hemolysates, 5 countries met the criterion, 2 did not, and 3 were borderline. At the manufacturer level using fresh whole blood specimens, 13 manufacturers met the criterion, 8 did not, and 3 were borderline. Using lyophilized hemolysates, 7 manufacturers met the criterion, 6 did not, and 3 were borderline. In both country and manufacturer groups, the major contribution to total error derived from between-laboratory variation. There were no substantial differences in performance between groups using fresh whole blood or lyophilized hemolysate samples. Conclusions: The state of the art is that 1 of 20 laboratories does not meet the IFCC criterion, but there are substantial differences between country and between manufacturer groups. Efforts to further improve quality should focus on reducing between-laboratory variation. With some limitations, fresh whole blood and well-defined lyophilized specimens are suitable for purpose

Survey of serum potassium reference measurements.

We compared the quality of reference measurements for serum potassium in four reference laboratories from three different European countries, using a panel of 60 native patients' samples. The reference methods were based on either ion chromatography (one laboratory) or flame atomic emission spectrometry (three laboratories). Performance specifications for serum potassium measurements were defined as a maximum overall coefficient of variation (CV) of 1·5%, a maximum bias of 0·65% and a maximum total error of 3·0%. The overall imprecision for all laboratories was in the range of 0·7 to 1·3%, and was thus below the proposed specification of 1·5%. However, two laboratories reported 12 and 13 quadruplicates with CVs exceeding this limit. The mean bias (expressed as deviation from the overall mean of all laboratories) for all reference laboratories was &lt; 0·65%. In the lower concentration range, however, one laboratory exceeded this limit. No laboratory measured samples with a total error above 3·0%. From these results, it can be concluded that the reference measurements, and, thus, also the reference methodologies, based on ion chromatography and flame atomic emission spectrometry were equivalent, and able to satisfy current analytical specifications for serum potassium measurements. </jats:p

Author&apos;s personal copy The problems of proteinuria measurement in urine with presence of Bence Jones protein

a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o Design and methods: The laboratories received a reference urine sample obtained from a patient with multiple myeloma and lambda free light chain proteinuria and were asked to type the paraprotein using immunofixation and to measure total urinary protein using their established method, most commonly turbidimetry, pyrogallol red assay, and biuret assay. Results: There was a very wide inter-laboratory variability in the protein concentration readouts with up to three-fold difference in some cases. High-resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis and linear mass spectrometry showed that a high proportion of the urinary paraprotein was composed of lambda light chain fragments with molecular weight of 12 kDa. Conclusions: Our results highlight the challenges of reliable and reproducible measurement of urinary protein concentration in the presence of Bence Jones protein