When perception intrudes on 2D grasping: evidence from Garner interference

© 2019, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. When participants reach out to pick up a real 3-D object, their grip aperture reflects the size of the object well before contact is made. At the same time, the classical psychophysical laws and principles of relative size and shape that govern visual perception do not appear to intrude into the control of such movements, which are instead tuned only to the relevant dimension for grasping. In contrast, accumulating evidence suggests that grasps directed at flat 2D objects are not immune to perceptual effects. Thus, in 2D but not 3D grasping, the aperture of the fingers has been shown to be affected by relative and contextual information about the size and shape of the target object. A notable example of this dissociation comes from studies of Garner interference, which signals holistic processing of shape. Previous research has shown that 3D grasping shows no evidence for Garner interference but 2D grasping does (Freud & Ganel, 2015). In a recent study published in this journal (Löhr-Limpens et al., 2019), participants were presented with 2D objects in a Garner paradigm. The pattern of results closely replicated the previously published results with 2D grasping. Unfortunately, the authors, who appear to be unaware the potential differences between 2D and 3D grasping, used their findings to draw an overgeneralized and unwarranted conclusion about the relation between 3D grasping and perception. In this short methodological commentary, we discuss current literature on aperture shaping during 2D grasping and suggest that researchers should play close attention to the nature of the target stimuli they use before drawing conclusions about visual processing for perception and action

Thinking on your feet:Anticipatory foot placements in repeated bimanual object displacements

Effective handling of objects requires proper use of the hands. If the object handling is done while standing or walking, it also requires proper use of the feet. We asked how people position their feet to meet future and ongoing object-handling demands. In previous research on this topic, participants walked to a table and picked up an object for a single displacement from one place to another. These studies shed light on sensitivity to kinematics but, strictly speaking, may not have revealed anything about sensitivity to dynamics. In the present study, we asked participants to walk to a table to move an object back and forth over different distances and at different rates. Prior to walking to the table, participants had full knowledge of what the task would be. By using a rhythmic rather than discrete object placement task, we could analyze participants' sensitivity to dynamics as well as kinematics. Consistent with our expectation that participants would tune their foot separations to demands related to dynamics, we found that stance width was wider for long than for short object displacements and was more pronounced for high displacement rates than for low displacement rates. Also consistent with our expectations about planning, these effects were evident as soon as participants reached the table. Our results add to the limited research on coordinated action of the hands and feet in purposeful object manipulation