Investigating correlation of faecal indicator bacteria and potential pathogenic fungi on Dublin beaches in the interest of public health

Sandy beaches are usually the preferred location for leisure activities but may pose a risk to public health in particular to children, the elderly and immuno compromised individuals Beach sand and marine water may be a reservoir of opportunistic and pathogenic microbes, as well as faecal indicator bacteria (that influence the bathing water quality status. The growth and the proliferation of microbes in beach sand and water are not restricted to bacteria but include also different groups of fungi such as potentially pathogenic and allergenic moulds, yeasts and dermatophytes Currently, no clear guidance about pathogenic fungi levels in relation to public health is available for these environments.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Correlation between antimicrobial resistance and faecal contamination in small urban streams and bathing waters

Antibiotic resistance represents the greatest challenge to healthcare systems around the world. As antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are shed in faeces, many studies have focused on how wastewater effluent contributes to ARG pollution in rivers. However, small urban streams and bathing waters not impacted by treated wastewater have received little attention though they may be important reservoirs of ARGs. The main objective of this study was to assess the extent to which ARG and faecal pollution impact small urban streams and bathing waters and to determine if there is a relationship between these contaminants. For one year, bi-monthly water samples were collected from two urban streams and Dublin city's three designated bathing waters. The Liffey Estuary, that receives treated wastewater, was also sampled. The sul1, tet(O), qnrS, blaTEM, blaSHV and blaCTX-M ARGs were quantified. E. coli and intestinal enterococci levels were determined and the source of faecal pollution (human, dog, gull) quantified by microbial source tracking. Our results show that the Liffey Estuary, the urban streams and the bathing waters are highly impacted by ARGs and human faeces. There were clear correlations between all of the studied faecal indicators and ARGs in the Liffey Estuary. In the urban streams relationships were observed for only some of the ARGs and faecal indicators, which is likely a result of non-continuous sewage leaks and overflows to the streams. Similarly, only some ARGs correlated with faecal indicators in the urban bathing waters. The source of ARGs in the bathing waters is likely to be multifaceted as we detected sporadic dog and gull faecal markers. This study demonstrates that small urban streams and bathing waters are reservoirs of ARGs and that they may pose a previously unrecognised public health risk as they have the potential to transmit enteric pathogens and antibiotic resistance determinants.</p

Bacterial and Bacteriophage Antibiotic Resistance in Marine Bathing Waters in Relation to Rivers and Urban Streams

Fecal pollution of surface water may introduce bacteria and bacteriophages harboring antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) into the aquatic environment. Watercourses discharging into the marine environment, especially close to designated bathing waters, may expose recreational users to fecal pollution and therefore may increase the likelihood that they will be exposed to ARGs. This study compares the bacterial and bacteriophage ARG profiles of two rivers (River Tolka and Liffey) and two small urban streams (Elm Park and Trimleston Streams) that discharge close to two marine bathing waters in Dublin Bay. Despite the potential differences in pollution pressures experienced by these waterways, microbial source tracking analysis showed that the main source of pollution in both rivers and streams in the urban environment is human contamination. All ARGs included in this study, blaTEM, blaSHV, qnrS, and sul1, were present in all four waterways in both the bacterial and bacteriophage fractions, displaying a similar ARG profile. We show that nearshore marine bathing waters are strongly influenced by urban rivers and streams discharging into these, since they shared a similar ARG profile. In comparison to rivers and streams, the levels of bacterial ARGs were significantly reduced in the marine environment. In contrast, the bacteriophage ARG levels in freshwater and the marine were not significantly different. Nearshore marine bathing waters could therefore be a potential reservoir of bacteriophages carrying ARGs. In addition to being considered potential additional fecal indicators organism, bacteriophages may also be viewed as indicators of the spread of antimicrobial resistance.</p

crAssphage as a human molecular marker to evaluate temporal and spatial variability in faecal contamination of urban marine bathing waters

Bathing water quality may be negatively impacted by diffuse pollution arising from urban and agricultural activities and wildlife, it is therefore important to be able to differentiate between biological and geographical sources of faecal pollution. crAssphage was recently described as a novel human-associated microbial source tracking marker. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the crAssphage marker in designated bathing waters. The sensitivity and specificity of the crAss_2 marker was evaluated using faecal samples from herring gulls, dogs, sewage and a stream impacted by human pollution (n = 80), which showed that all human impacted samples tested positive for the marker while none of the animal samples did. The crAss_2 marker was field tested in an urban marine bathing water close to the discharge point of human impacted streams. In addition, the bathing water is affected by dog and gull fouling. Analysis of water samples taken at the compliance point every 30 min during a tidal cycle following a rain event showed that the crAss_2 and HF183 markers performed equally well (Spearman correlation ρ = 0.84). The levels of these marker and faecal indicators (Escherichia coli, intestinal enterococci, somatic coliphages) varied by up to 2.5 log10 during the day. Analysis of a high-tide transect perpendicular to the shoreline revealed high levels of localised faecal contamination 1 km offshore, with a concomitant spike in the gull marker. In contrast, both the crAss_2 and HF183 markers remained at a constant level, showing that human faecal contamination is homogenously distributed, while gull pollution is localised. Performance of the crAss_2 and HF183 assay was further evaluated in bimonthly compliance point samples over an 18-month period. The co-occurrence between the crAss_2 and HF183 markers in compliance sampling was 76%. A combination of both markers should be applied in low pollution impacted environments to obtain a high confidence level.</p

crAssphage as a human molecular marker to evaluate temporal and spatial variability in faecal contamination of urban marine bathing waters

Bathing water quality may be negatively impacted by diffuse pollution arising from urban and agricultural activities and wildlife, it is therefore important to be able to differentiate between biological and geographical sources of faecal pollution. crAssphage was recently described as a novel human-associated microbial source tracking marker. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the crAssphage marker in designated bathing waters. The sensitivity and specificity of the crAss_2 marker was evaluated using faecal samples from herring gulls, dogs, sewage and a stream impacted by human pollution (n = 80), which showed that all human impacted samples tested positive for the marker while none of the animal samples did. The crAss_2 marker was field tested in an urban marine bathing water close to the discharge point of human impacted streams. In addition, the bathing water is affected by dog and gull fouling. Analysis of water samples taken at the compliance point every 30 min during a tidal cycle following a rain event showed that the crAss_2 and HF183 markers performed equally well (Spearman correlation ρ = 0.84). The levels of these marker and faecal indicators (Escherichia coli, intestinal enterococci, somatic coliphages) varied by up to 2.5 log10 during the day. Analysis of a high-tide transect perpendicular to the shoreline revealed high levels of localised faecal contamination 1 km offshore, with a concomitant spike in the gull marker. In contrast, both the crAss_2 and HF183 markers remained at a constant level, showing that human faecal contamination is homogenously distributed, while gull pollution is localised. Performance of the crAss_2 and HF183 assay was further evaluated in bimonthly compliance point samples over an 18-month period. The co-occurrence between the crAss_2 and HF183 markers in compliance sampling was 76%. A combination of both markers should be applied in low pollution impacted environments to obtain a high confidence level