Mitochondrial DNA haplogroups associated with MRI-detected structural damage in early knee osteoarthritis

[Abstract] Objective: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected structural features are associated with increased risk of radiographic osteoarthritis (ROA). Specific mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplogroups have been associated with incident ROA. Our objective was to compare the presence of MRI-detected structural features across mtDNA haplogroups among knees that developed incident ROA. Design: Knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) that developed incident ROA during 48 months follow-up were identified from Caucasian participants. mtDNA haplogroups were assigned based on a single base extension assay. MRIs were obtained annually between baseline and 4-year follow-up and scored using the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS). The association between mtDNA haplogroups and MRI-detected structural features was estimated using log-binomial regression. Participants who carried haplogroup H served as the reference group. Results: The sample included 255 participants contributing 277 knees that developed ROA. Haplogroups included H (116, 45%), J (17, 7%), T (26, 10%), Uk (61, 24%), and the remaining less common haplogroups ("others") (35, 14%). Knees of participants with haplogroup J had significantly lower risk of medium/large bone marrow lesions (BMLs) in the medial compartment [3.2%, relative risks (RR) = 0.17; 95%CI: 0.05, 0.64; P = 0.009] compared to knees of participants who carried haplogroup H [16.3%], as did knees from participants within the "others" group [2.8%, RR = 0.20; 95%CI: 0.08, 0.55; P = 0.002], over the 4 year follow-up period. Conclusions: mtDNA haplogroup J was associated with lower risk of BMLs in the medial compartment among knees that developed ROA. Our results offer a potential hypothesis to explain the mechanism underlying the previously reported protective association between haplogroup J and ROA.National Institute of Health; NIH HHSN2682010000 21CNational Institute of Health; NIH AR06660

Sedentary behavior is associated with colorectal adenoma recurrence in men

Purpose The association between physical activity and colorectal adenoma is equivocal. This study was designed to assess the relationship between physical activity and colorectal adenoma recurrence. Methods Pooled analyses from two randomized, controlled trials included 1,730 participants who completed the Arizona Activity Frequency Questionnaire at baseline, had a colorectal adenoma removed within 6 months of study registration, and had a follow-up colonoscopy during the trial. Logistic regression modeling was employed to estimate the effect of sedentary behavior, light-intensity physical activity, and moderate-vigorous physical activity on colorectal adenoma recurrence. Results No statistically significant trends were found for any activity type and odds of colorectal adenoma recurrence in the pooled population. However, males with the highest levels of sedentary time experienced 47 % higher odds of adenoma recurrence. Compared to the lowest quartile of sedentary time, the ORs (95 % CIs) for the second, third, and fourth quartiles among men were 1.23 (0.88, 1.74), 1.41 (0.99, 2.01), and 1.47 (1.03, 2.11), respectively (p trend = 0.03). No similar association was observed for women. Conclusions This study suggests that sedentary behavior is associated with a higher risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence among men, providing evidence of detrimental effects of a sedentary lifestyle early in the carcinogenesis pathway

One-Year Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia: U.S. Versus U.K. Risk-Stratification Guidelines

United Kingdom (U.K.) and United States (U.S.) guidelines for risk stratification after polypectomy differ, as do recommended surveillance intervals

Widespread Pain Is Associated with Increased Risk of No Clinical Improvement After TKA in Women

Background When conservative treatments do not work, TKA may be the best option for patients with knee osteoarthritis, although a relatively large proportion of individuals do not have clinically important improvement after TKA. Evidence also suggests that women are less likely to benefit from TKA than men, but the reasons are unclear. Widespread pain disproportionately affects women and has been associated with worse outcomes after joint arthroplasty, yet it is unknown if the effect of widespread pain on TKA outcomes differs by patient gender. Questions/purposes (1) Does the association between widespread pain and no clinically important improvement in osteoarthritis-related pain and disability 2 years after TKA differ between men and women? (2) Does the use of pain medications 2 years after TKA differ between those with widespread pain and those without widespread pain before surgery? Methods Osteoarthritis Initiative () study participants were followed annually from March 2005 until October 2015. Participants who underwent TKA up to the 7-year follow-up visit with pain/disability assessment at the protocol-planned visit before TKA and at the second planned annual visit after surgery were included in the analysis. Among 4796 study participants, 391 had a confirmed TKA, including 315 with pain/disability assessment at the protocol-planned visit before TKA. Overall, 95% of participants (298) had the required follow-up assessment; 5% (17) did not have follow-up data. Widespread pain was defined based on the modified American College of Rheumatology criteria. Symptoms were assessed using the WOMAC pain (range 0 to 20; higher score, more pain) and disability (range 0 to 68; higher score, more disability) scores, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for pain (range 0 to 100; higher score, less pain). Improvements in pain and disability were classified based on improvement from established clinically important differences (decrease in WOMAC pain >= 1.5; decrease in WOMAC disability >= 6.0; increase in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for pain >= 9). At baseline, more women presented with widespread pain than men (45% [84 of 184] versus 32% [36 of 114]). Probability and the relative risk (RR) of no clinically important improvement were estimated using a logistic regression analysis in which participants with widespread pain and those without were compared. The analyses were done for men and women separately, then adjusted for depression and baseline outcome scores. Results Among women, preoperative widespread pain was associated with an increased risk of no clinically important improvement 2 years after TKA, based on WOMAC pain scores (13.5% versus 4.6%; RR 2.93 [95% CI 1.18 to 7.30]; p = 0.02) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for pain (16.5% versus 4.9%; RR 3.39 [95% CI 1.34 to 8.59]; p = 0.02). Given the lower and upper limits of the confidence intervals, our data are compatible with a broad range of disparate associations between widespread pain and lack of clinically important improvement in WOMAC pain scores (RR 0.77 [95% CI 0.22 to 2.70]; p = 0.68) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for pain (RR 1.37 [95% CI 0.47 to 4.00]; p = 0.57) among men, as well as clinically important improvement in WOMAC disability scores among men (RR 0.72 [95% CI 0.20 to 2.55]; p = 0.61) and women (RR 1.98 [95% CI 0.92 to 4.26]; p = 0.08). Participants presenting with widespread pain before TKA were more likely than those without widespread pain to use medication for symptoms of knee osteoarthritis most days for at least 1 month 2 years after TKA (51% [61 of 120] versus 32% [57 of 178]; mean difference, 18.8 [95% CI 7.3 to 30.1]; p < 0.01). Conclusions Widespread pain before TKA was associated with an increased risk of no clinically important improvement in knee pain 2 years postoperatively among women. Because of the small number of men with widespread pain in the sample, the results for men were inconclusive. In clinical practice, screening TKA candidates for widespread pain may be useful, and expectations of surgical outcomes may need to be tempered if patients have a concurrent diagnosis of widespread pain. Future studies should include more men with widespread pain and investigate if treatment of widespread pain before or concurrent with TKA surgery may improve surgical outcomes.12 month embargo; published online: 16 October 2019This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

Relationship Between Knee Pain and Patient Preferences for Joint Replacement: Health Care Access Matters

Objective: To determine if severity of osteoarthritis-related knee pain is associated with a willingness to undergo total knee replacement (TKR) and whether this association is confounded or modified by components of socioeconomic status and health care coverage. MethodsCross-sectional analysis was conducted among 3,530 Osteoarthritis Initiative study participants. Logistic regression models were used to assess the effect of knee pain severity (where 0=none, 1-3=mild, 4-7=moderate, and 8-10=severe) on willingness to undergo TKR. Stratified analyses were conducted to evaluate whether socioeconomic status and health care coverage modify the effect of knee pain severity on willingness. Results: Participants with severe knee pain, compared to participants without pain, were less willing to undergo TKR (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.57-0.93). This association was attenuated when adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, depression, health insurance coverage, prescription medicine coverage, health care source, education, income, employment, race, and marital status (adjusted OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68-1.24). The odds of willingness to undergo TKR were significantly lower in those with the highest level of pain, compared to those without pain, among participants without health insurance (adjusted OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.56), but not among those with health insurance (adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.73-1.38), when adjusted for demographic, clinical, health care access, and socioeconomic factors (P=0.015). However, <5% of participants were without health insurance. Conclusion: Among participants without health insurance, severe knee pain was paradoxically associated with less willingness to undergo TKR. Policies that improve access to quality health care may affect patient preferences and increase utilization of TKR surgery among vulnerable populations.NIH, a branch of the Department of Health and Human Services [N01-AR-2-2258, N01-AR-2-2259, N01-AR-2-2260, N01-AR-2-2261, N01-AR-2-2262]; Merck Research Laboratories; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; GlaxoSmithKline; Pfizer12 month embargo; Version of record online: 27 December 2016This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

Reliability and Validity of Single Axial Slice vs. Multiple Slice Quantitative Measurement of the Volume of Effusion-Synovitis on 3T Knee MRI in Knees with Osteoarthritis

Effusion-synovitis (ES) is recognized as a component of osteoarthritis, creating a need for rapid methods to assess ES on MRI. We describe the development and reliability of an efficient single-slice semi-automated quantitative approach to measure ES. We used two samples from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI): 50 randomly selected OAI participants with radiographic osteoarthritis (i.e., Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade 2 or 3) and a subset from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Osteoarthritis Biomarker study. An experienced musculoskeletal radiologist trained four non-expert readers to use custom semi-automated software to measure ES on a single axial slice and then read scans blinded to prior assessments. The estimated intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intra-reader reliability of the single-slice ES method in the KL 2–3 sample was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97), and for inter-reader reliability, the ICC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95). The intra-reader mean absolute difference (MAD) was 35 mm3 (95% CI: 28, 44), and the inter-reader MAD was 61 mm3 (95% CI: 48, 76). Our single-slice quantitative knee ES measurement offers a reliable, valid, and efficient surrogate for multi-slice quantitative and semi-quantitative assessment

Data from Figure 4 (part 1 of 4): The E3 ubiquitin ligase MARCH1 regulates glucose-tolerance and lipid storage in a sex-specific manner

Original immunoblot images of liver sample