La fraction amino-terminale du peptide natriurétique de type B pour prédire le devenir des patients ayant une sténose aortique à bas débit : sa supériorité au peptide natriurétique de type B et son rôle pour aider la décision thérapeutique

La stratégie thérapeutique actuelle pour la sténose aortique à bas débit (SA-BD) n’intègre pas la gradation de la sévérité de la maladie du ventricule gauche (SMVG) pour sélectionner les meilleurs candidats au remplacement valvulaire aortique (RVA). MÉTHODE La SMVG a été gradée par le ratio d’activation du peptide natriurétique de type-B (BNP-ratio) et par celui de la fraction N-terminale de son précurseur (NT-proBNP-ratio). Leurs performances pronostiques ont été étudiées séparément puis en comparaison directe (sous-population avec les deux biomarqueurs). Le meilleur biomarqueur a été utilisé pour étudier le bénéfice cardiovasculaire du RVA en fonction de la SMVG. RÉSULTATS Le NT-proBNP-ratio prédisait la mortalité à 12 et 36 mois avec une aire sous la courbe d’efficacité du récepteur (ASCER) à 0.67±0.04 et 0.66±0.05, respectivement (p=0.001). Il a été indépendamment corrélé à la mortalité (risque relatif ajusté [RRa]=1.39, [1.11-1.74], p=0.004). Le BNP-ratio était significativement discriminant pour la mortalité à 12 mois seulement et tendait à prédire le temps au décès en utilisant un seuil>7.4 (RRa=2.14 [1.00- 4.58], p=0.05). La supériorité du NT-proBNP-ratio a été vérifiée en comparaison directe: i) les ASCER pour la mortalité à 12 et 36 mois étaient supérieures (p11 prédisait un grand bénéfice de survie par RVA (RRa=0.52 [0.31-0.85], p=0.009), tandis qu’avec NT-proBNP-ratio7.4 tended to predict time to death (adjusted HR=2.14 [1.00-4.58], p=0.05). NT-proBNP-ratio significantly predicted one and three-year mortality (AUC=0.67±0.04 and 0.66±0.05, both p=0.001), and independently predicted time to death (HR=1.39 /per one increment of LogNT-proBNP-ratio, [1.11-1.74], p=0.004). In a head-to-head comparison, the AUCs for one and three-year mortality were higher with NT-proBNP-ratio versus BNP-ratio (p11 the adjusted HR of death associated with AVI was 0.52 ([0.31-0.85], p=0.009). On the other hand, NT-proBNP-ratio <11 identified patients (54% with peudosevere AS) in whom short-term event-free survival was excellent under conservative management. Conclusion: NT-proBNP-ratio is a powerful independent predictor of death and should be preferred over BNPratio to risk-stratify CLF-AS patients. The assessment of LV function impairment using NT-proBNP-ratio has important clinical implications and should be complementary to the determination of true AS severity

Multimodality imaging for discordant low-gradient aortic stenosis : assessing the valve and the myocardium

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a disease of the valve and the myocardium. A correct assessment of the valve disease severity is key to define the need for aortic valve replacement (AVR), but a better understanding of the myocardial consequences of the increased afterload is paramount to optimize the timing of the intervention. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the cornerstone of AS assessment, as it is universally available, and it allows a comprehensive structural and hemodynamic evaluation of both the aortic valve and the rest of the heart. However, it may not be sufficient as a significant proportion of patients with severe AS presents with discordant grading (i.e., an AVA ≤1 cm2 and a mean gradien

Comparison of early surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus conservative management in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis sing Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting: Results From the TOPAS Prospective Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: No randomized comparison of early (ie, ≤3 months) aortic valve replacement (AVR) versus conservative management or of transcatheter AVR (TAVR) versus surgical AVR has been conducted in patients with low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 481 consecutive patients (75±10 years; 71% men) with LFLG AS (aortic valve area ≤0.6 cm2/ m2 and mean gradient <40 mm Hg), 72% with classic LFLG and 28% with paradoxical LFLG, were prospectively recruited in the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. True-severe AS or pseudo-severe AS was adjudicated by flow-independent criteria. During follow-up (median [IQR] 36 [11–60] months), 220 patients died. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting to address the bias of nonrandom treatment assignment, early AVR (n=272) was associated with a major overall survival benefit (hazard ratio [HR], 0.34 [95% CI, 0.24–0.50]; P<0.001). This benefit was observed in patients with true-severe AS but also with pseudo-severe AS (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18–0.81]; P=0.01), and in classic (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.22–0.49]; P<0.001) and paradoxical LFLG AS (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.20–0.92]; P=0.03). Compared with conservative management in the conventional multivariate model, trans femoral TAVR was associated with the best survival (HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.12–0.43]; P<0.001), followed by surgical AVR (HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.23–0.56]; P<0.001) and alternative-access TAVR (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.31–0.82]; P=0.007). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting model, trans femoral TAVR appeared to be superior to surgical AVR (HR [95% CI] 0.28 [0.11–0.72]; P=0.008) with regard to survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this large prospective observational study of LFLG AS, early AVR appeared to confer a major survival benefit in both classic and paradoxical LFLG AS. This benefit seems to extend to the subgroup with pseudo-severe AS. Our findings suggest that TAVR using femoral access might be the best strategy in these patients

Impact of sex and sex hormones on pathophysiology and progression of aortic stenosis in a murine model

The lesions observed in AS have been shown to be sex specific, with women presenting extensive fibrotic remodeling while men developing more calcification deposit. We thus aimed to evaluate the influence of sex and sex hormones on the pathophysiology of aortic valve stenosis (AS) in our mouse model of AS. LDLr-/- ApoB100/100 IGF-II+/- mice (n = 210) were separated in six different groups: (1) intact male (IM), (2) intact female (IF), (3) castrated male (CM), (4) ovariectomized females (OF), (5) CM with testosterone supplementation (CMT), and (6) OF with 17β-estradiol supplementation (OFE). Mice were fed a high-fat/high-sucrose/high-cholesterol diet for 6 months. Hemodynamic progression of AS was followed by transthoracic echocardiography (at 12 and 36 weeks) and analyzed in all mice alive at 36 weeks. Aortic valves were collected for histological and digital droplet PCR* analysis. Increases in peak velocity were comparable in IF and IM (24.2 ± 5.7 vs. 25.8 ± 5.3 cm/s; p = 0.68), but IF presented with less severe AS. Between the three groups of male mice, AS progression was more important in IM (increase in peak velocity: 24.2 ± 5.7 cm/s; p < 0.001) compared to CM (6.2 ± 1.4; p = 0.42), and CMT (15.1 ± 3.5; p = 0.002). In the three groups of female mice, there were no statistical differences in AS progression. Digital PCR analysis revealed an important upregulation of the osteogenic gene RunX2 in IM (p < 0.0001) and downregulation of the pro-calcifying gene ALPL in IF (p < 0.05). Male sex and testosterone play an important role in upregulation of pro-calcifying genes and hemodynamic progression of AS. However, female mice appeared to be protected against calcification, characterized by downregulation of pro-osteogenic genes, but presented a similar AS hemodynamic progressio

Effect of regional upper septal hypertrophy on echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular mass and remodeling in aortic stenosis

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the reference method for evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS), and it is extensively used to quantitate left ventricular (LV) mass and volumes. Regional upper septal hypertrophy (USH) or septal bulge is a frequent finding in patients with AS and may lead to overestimation of LV mass when using linear measurements. The objective of this study was to compare estimates of LV mass obtained by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic LV dimensions measured at different levels of the LV cavity with those obtained by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods: One hundred six patients (mean age, 63 6 15 years; 68% men) with AS were included in this subanalysis of the PROGRESSA study. Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic measurements of LV dimensions were obtained at the basal level (BL; as recommended in guidelines), immediately below the septal bulge (BSB), and at a midventricular level (ML). Regional USH was defined as a basal interventricular septal thickness $ 13 mm and >1.3 times the thickness of the septal wall at the ML. Agreement between transthoracic echocardiographic and CMR measures was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The distribution of AS severity was mild in 23%, moderate in 57%, and severe in 20% of patients. Regional USH was present in 28 patients (26%). In the whole cohort, two-dimensional TTE overestimated LV mass (bias: BL, +60 6 31 g; BSB, +59 6 32 g; ML, +54 6 32 g; P = .02). The biplane Simpson method slightly but significantly underestimated LV end-diastolic volume (bias 10 6 20 mL, P < .001) compared with CMR. Overestimation of LV mass was more marked in patients with USH when measuring at the BL and was significantly lower when measuring LV dimensions at the ML (P < .025 vs BL and BSB). Conclusions: Two-dimensional TTE systematically overestimated LV mass and underestimated LV volumes compared with CMR. However, the bias between TTE and CMR was less important when measuring at the ML. Measurements at the BL as suggested in guidelines should be avoided, and measurements at the ML should be preferred in patients with AS, especially in those with USH

Open questions and research needs in the adoption of conservation agriculture in the mediterranean area

This article aims to provide a review of major challenges and research needs for the diffusion of conservation agriculture (CA) and the improvement of crop–soil–water conditions in Southern Europe and Northern Africa. A multidisciplinary study and a participatory approach are at the basis of an international project of research and innovation action, “Research-based participatory approaches for adopting conservation agriculture in the Mediterranean Area-CAMA”. It aims to understand the reasons and the research needs that limit a large CA diffusion in the Mediterranean countries. CAMA aims to provide significant advances to CA through multidisciplinary research at the field and farm scales (with main emphasis on smallholder), encompassing a socio-economic analysis of the reasons that obstacle the CA diffusion, legume crop improvement as a component of improved CA cropping systems, and a network of long-term experiments on CA and soil characteristic modification. Its results will be available to scientific and farming communities.This research received the financial funding by PRIMA (Grant Agreement n. 1912), a programme supported by the European Union, research project “Research-based participatory approaches for adopting Conservation Agriculture in the Mediterranean Area – CAMA”, coord. Dott. Michele Rinaldi. Special thanks to Fabrice Dentressangle, CAMA Project Officer and to “Italian PRIMA Secretariate” office

Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER 2 trial and registry

Objectives This study aimed to compare incidence and impact of measured prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPMM) versus predicted PPM (PPMP) after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Background TAVR studies have used measured effective orifice area indexed (EOAi) to body surface area (BSA) to define PPM, but most SAVR series have used predicted EOAi. This difference may contribute to discrepancies in incidence and outcomes of PPM between series. Methods The study analyzed SAVR patients from the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) 2A trial and TAVR patients from the PARTNER 2 SAPIEN 3 Intermediate Risk registry. PPM was classified as moderate if EOAi ≤0.85 cm2/m2 (≤0.70 if obese: body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) and severe if EOAi ≤0.65 cm2/m2 (≤0.55 if obese). PPMM was determined by the core lab–measured EOAi on 30-day echocardiogram. PPMP was determined by 2 methods: 1) using normal EOA reference values previously reported for each valve model and size (PPMP1; n = 929 SAVR, 1,069 TAVR) indexed to BSA; and 2) using normal reference EOA predicted from aortic annulus size measured by computed tomography (PPMP2; n = 864 TAVR only) indexed to BSA. Primary endpoint was the composite of 5-year all-cause death and rehospitalization. Results The incidence of moderate and severe PPMP was much lower than PPMM in both SAVR (PPMP1: 28.4% and 1.2% vs. PPMM: 31.0% and 23.6%) and TAVR (PPMP1: 21.0% and 0.1% and PPMP2: 17.0% and 0% vs. PPMM: 27.9% and 5.7%). The incidence of severe PPMM and severe PPMP1 was lower in TAVR versus SAVR (P < 0.001). The presence of PPM by any method was associated with higher transprosthetic gradient. Severe PPMP1 was independently associated with events in SAVR after adjustment for sex and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (hazard ratio: 3.18;95% CI: 1.69-5.96; P < 0.001), whereas no association was observed between PPM by any method and outcomes in TAVR. Conclusions EOAi measured by echocardiography results in a higher incidence of PPM following SAVR or TAVR than PPM based on predicted EOAi. Severe PPMP is rare (<1.5%), but is associated with increased all-cause death and rehospitalization after SAVR, whereas it is absent following TAVR

Dobutamine stress echocardiography in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis flow reserve does not matter anymore

Low‐flow, low‐gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most challenging cardiovascular conditions in terms of diagnosis and therapeutic management. Because of the low‐flow state, the transvalvular peak velocity and pressure gradient may underestimate the stenosis severity, whereas the aortic valve area (AVA) may overestimate the severity.1 It is thus difficult or impossible to confirm the presence of severe AS and thus the indication of aortic valve replacement (AVR) from the resting echocardiography in such patients. LFLG AS may occur with reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF; ie, classical LFLG) or with preserved LVEF (ie, paradoxical LFLG). In classical LFLG, it is recommended to perform a low‐dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE): (1) To assess the presence of LV flow reserve (FR) and (2) To differentiate true‐severe versus pseudo‐severe AS.1 The 2017 European Guidelines2 recommend AVR (Class I) in classical LFLG AS (LVEF <50%, AVA <1.0 cm2, and mean gradient <40 mm Hg at resting echocardiography) if the patient demonstrates evidence of FR (percent increase in stroke volume ≥20%) and true‐severe AS (stress AVA <1.0 cm2) with DSE. In the absence of FR, these guidelines recommend AVR (Class IIa) if severe AS can be confirmed with other imaging modalities such as aortic valve calcium scoring by computed tomography (CT). The 2017 American Guidelines update3 do not account for FR and recommend AVR (Class IIa) if the patient shows evidence of true‐severe AS on DSE, defined as stress mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg. In this issue of the Journal of the American Heart Associaton (JAHA), Sato et al4 present the results of an elegant study that aimed to examine the prognostic impact of DSE in a series of 235 patients with classical LFLG AS. FR was observed in 59% of the patients and true‐severe AS in 37% of the patients. Within a median follow‐up of 2.3 years, AVR was associated with a major survival benefit regardless of the presence or absence of FR or true‐severe AS on DSE

Workup and management of patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis

About 60% of patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient (PLF-LG) aortic stenosis (AS) have a severe disease that justifies aortic valve replacement (AVR). The first step in patients with symptomatic PLF AS should be to rule out measurement errors and treat hypertension. The second step is to distinguish pseudo-severe from true severe AS (TSAS). The third step is to select the optimal treatment modality at the right time. Regarding the second step, projected aortic valve area calculated using stress echocardiography is superior to traditional severity criteria (AVA G 1.0 cm2 and mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg) to unmask TSAS and predict outcomes. Aortic valve calcification score quantitated by computed tomography is helpful to identify TSAS by applying thresholds of 2000 and 1200 AU, respectively, for men and women. This modality should be considered, partic- ularly if stress echocardiography is either not feasible or inconclusive. Once AS severity is confirmed, a risk stratification based on symptomatic status and the importance of left ventricular (LV) systolic impairment will guide therapeutic decision. Symptomatic assess- ment should not solely rely on patient-reported symptom status, but rather include an objective exercise test. The presence of symptomatic PLF-LG TSAS is a class IIa indication for AVR in the guidelines. In asymptomatic patients, a markedly reduced stroke volume, the presence of myocardial fibrosis by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, a poor longitudinal LV function as assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography, and/or a moderate to severe LV diastolic dysfunction are predictors of poor outcome in PLF-LG patients and may indicate the need of early AVR. The type of AVR should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team, bearing in mind that transcatheter AVR (TAVR) is superior to medical treatment in inoperable patients. Furthermore, TAVR may be a useful alterna- tive to surgical AVR (SAVR) in high-risk patients. Nevertheless, the potential benefits of TAVR, including the lower risk of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch, should be weighed against the risk of paravalvular regurgitation, which is likely poorly tolerated by patients with PLF-LG who often harbor a small and non-compliant LV cavity