End-of-life and bereavement support to families in cancer care: A cross-sectional survey with bereaved family members

Background Losing a close other to cancer is an incisive experience that occurs after a long course of illness and intense family caregiving. Despite an evident need for family engagement and support and guidance on this, patients and family members may not receive the attention and support they need when a family unit is experiencing a disruption by death. A clear understanding of the quality of care that is currently provided and its ability to address family needs is necessary to improve end-of-life and bereavement support to families affected by cancer. The purpose of this study is to investigate the quality of support of end-of-life and bereavement care to families, their (un)met needs, grief experiences, and self-perceived health outcomes. Methods A multi-center, cross-sectional observational survey study with family members (n = 35) whose close other died of cancer in a health institution or their own home in German-speaking Switzerland. Results Bereaved family members were mostly satisfied with end-of-life care. Information on the grief process and services, and acknowledgment of their grief was experienced as helpful. Most coped with their grief drawing on family resources and exhibited resilience, but they reported unmet needs in relation to family togetherness and caregiving. Conclusion This study with a small number of family members indicates that support provided to families across settings and illness trajectories is perceived as helpful, with specific needs related to family support. The findings suggest that improvements should focus on ensuring care that addresses the family as a unit and enables togetherness, mutual reflection, meaningful relationships, preparedness for death, resilience, and benefit-finding. Protocol registration https://osf.io/j4kfh

Adoption of evidence-based end-of-life and bereavement support to families in cancer care: A contextual analysis study with health professionals

Aims To investigate the level of adoption of evidence-based family engagement and support during end-of-life cancer care and subsequent bereavement and its contextual facilitators and barriers from health professionals' perspectives, and to explore differences between professional groups. Design Contextual analysis using an online cross-sectional survey. Methods This study was conducted in four Swiss hospitals and three home care oncology and palliative care services. Non-parametric testing was used to investigate the level of adoption and differences between nurses, physicians, occupational- and physiotherapists and psychosocial professionals (chaplains, onco-psychologists and social workers). The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was followed. Results The majority of the 111 participating health professionals were nurses. Adoption was statistically significantly higher during end-of-life care than bereavement, with nurses and physicians reporting higher levels than the other professional groups. Guidance on end-of-life family care was available in about half of the cases, in contrast to a quarter for bereavement care. Self-perceived knowledge, skills and attitudes were moderate to high, with nurses and physicians reporting higher levels than others, except for general skills in working with families. Organisational structures were experienced as rather supportive, with the psychosocial group appraising the organisational context as significantly less conducive to fully implementing end-of-life and bereavement care than others, particularly during the end-of-life phase. Conclusion Evidence-based family engagement and support were better adopted during end-of-life care than bereavement. Overall, nurses and physicians felt better enabled to care for families compared to other professional groups. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution. Protocol registration https://osf.io/j4kfh. Implications for the profession and/or patient care Implementation and quality improvement efforts should focus particularly on the bereavement phase and be tailored to professional groups. Impact The findings show that evidence-based family engagement and support practices during end-of-life were rather well adopted in contrast to subsequent bereavement care, with nurses and physicians better enabled than other professionals to provide care. A better understanding of health professionals' contributions and roles in family care is important to build interprofessional capacity for evidence-based end-of-life and bereavement support. Reporting Method The STROBE checklist for reports of cross-sectional studies was followed (von Elm et al., 2007)

No Survival Differences among Germ-Cell Cancer Patients from Urban and Rural Areas

INTRODUCTION Germ-cell cancer (GCC) is curable in the majority of men. However, previous reports have described inferior outcomes in men living in rural as compared to urban residential areas. METHODS We identified all GCC patients treated at two large university hospitals in Zürich and Bern, both in Switzerland, between 2010 and 2020 by retrospective chart review. In 400 patients from Zürich and 274 patients from Bern, details on presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes were abstracted from medical records. For follow-up, we contacted referring centers or private physicians. Residential region was allocated according to the Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland. RESULTS We found no differences in initial presentation (clinical stage I [CSI] versus de novo metastatic), relapse rate in CSI patients, response in metastatic patients (favorable vs. unfavorable), progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between patients from urban as compared to suburban or rural residential areas. PFS at 3 years for CSI patients was 78% (95% confidence interval 72-82%) and OS at 5 years was 98% (95% confidence interval 96-99%). PFS at 3 years for de novo metastatic patients was 74% (95% confidence interval 68-79%) and OS at 5 years was 86% (95% confidence interval 80-90%). CONCLUSION Treatment outcomes in GCC patients were excellent and comparable to international standards at both centers irrespective of the residential area of patients documenting equal access to high-level oncological care at both centers

No Survival Differences among Germ-Cell Cancer Patients from Urban and Rural Areas.

INTRODUCTION Germ-cell cancer (GCC) is curable in the majority of men. However, previous reports have described inferior outcomes in men living in rural as compared to urban residential areas. METHODS We identified all GCC patients treated at two large university hospitals in Zürich and Bern, both in Switzerland, between 2010 and 2020 by retrospective chart review. In 400 patients from Zürich and 274 patients from Bern, details on presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes were abstracted from medical records. For follow-up, we contacted referring centers or private physicians. Residential region was allocated according to the Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland. RESULTS We found no differences in initial presentation (clinical stage I [CSI] versus de novo metastatic), relapse rate in CSI patients, response in metastatic patients (favorable vs. unfavorable), progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between patients from urban as compared to suburban or rural residential areas. PFS at 3 years for CSI patients was 78% (95% confidence interval 72-82%) and OS at 5 years was 98% (95% confidence interval 96-99%). PFS at 3 years for de novo metastatic patients was 74% (95% confidence interval 68-79%) and OS at 5 years was 86% (95% confidence interval 80-90%). CONCLUSION Treatment outcomes in GCC patients were excellent and comparable to international standards at both centers irrespective of the residential area of patients documenting equal access to high-level oncological care at both centers

Perioperative complications and oncological outcomes of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with germ cell cancer at two high-volume university centres in Switzerland - a retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND: Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) is an integral part of the management of patients with metastatic non-seminoma and residual masses >1 cm after chemotherapy. AIMS: To assess perioperative complications and oncological outcomes at two major referral centres in Switzerland. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 136 patients with non-seminoma who underwent PC-RPLND between 2010 and 2020 at the university hospitals of Bern and Zürich. Patient, treatment and tumour characteristics as well as the types and frequencies of intra- and postoperative complications were registered and compared using the chi-square test. Oncological outcomes consisted of the time and location of relapses as well as progression-free and overall survival, which were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Overall, 70 patients from Bern and 66 patients from Zürich were included; 5 patients had a previous retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) (2 Bern, 3 Zürich). Vascular injuries were the most frequent intraoperative complication, occurring in 27/136 (19.9%) patients. Postoperative complications were observed in 42/136 (30.9%) patients, ileus being the most common. Perioperative mortality was 2.2%. A retroperitoneal mass ≥50 mm was significantly associated with intraoperative complications (p = 0.004) and increased resource demands (p = 0.021). Postoperative morbidity was higher according to age at post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection ≥40 years (p = 0.028) and retroperitoneal mass ≥20 mm (p = 0.005). The median follow-up time was 37 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18-64 months). The median progression-free survival at 5 years was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64-85%) in Bern and 69% (95% CI: 54-80%) in Zürich (p = 0.464). The median overall survival at 5 years was 88% (95% CI: 76-94%) in Bern and 77% (95% CI: 60-87%) in Zürich (p = 0.335). Patients with progressive disease or a tumour marker increase before retroperitoneal lymph node dissection had significantly inferior progression-free and overall survival compared to non-progressing patients. The presence of teratoma in resected specimens did not confer inferior survival probabilities compared to necrosis only, whereas the presence of vital undifferentiated tumour conferred inferior progression-free and overall survival. Patients with a previous retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and patients operated for late relapses >2 years after chemotherapy also had significantly inferior progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: We found a relevant rate of severe perioperative complications at PC-RPLND at even experienced high-volume centres. The oncological outcomes at two major university urological centres in Switzerland were similar and determined by preoperative risk factors and intraoperative histology

PD-L1 expression and correlation with outcome in muscle-invasive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: review and critical discussion

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors including atezolizumab, pembrolizumab and nivolumab has become an essential pillar in the management of muscle invasive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The field has evolved quickly in the past few years and several early beliefs have recently been upended. One such belief relates to the predictive value of PD-L1 expression based on immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, requirements for PD-L1 expression from regulatory bodies still restrict the use of checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial carcinoma. This article provides a critical review of the available data from the registration trials on which the current regulations have been based with the conclusion that a review of the current approval status incorporating PD-1 expression is warranted

Treatment Outcomes for Men with Clinical Stage II Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumours Treated with Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT Guidelines recommend primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a treatment option for tumour marker-negative stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT). OBJECTIVE To review the literature on oncological outcomes for men with stage II NSGCT treated with RPLND. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of studies describing clinicopathological outcomes following primary RPLND in stage II NSGCT was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. Baseline data, perioperative and postoperative parameters, and oncological outcomes were collected. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS In total, 12 of 4387 studies were included, from which we collected data for 835 men. Among men with clinical stage II NSGCT, pathological stage II was confirmed in 615 of 790 patients (78%). Most studies administered adjuvant chemotherapy in cases with large lymph nodes, multiple affected lymph nodes, or persistently elevated tumour markers. Recurrence was observed in 12-40% of patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and 0-4% of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The literature describing RPLND in clinical stage II NSGCT is heterogeneous and no meta-analysis was possible, but RPLND can provide accurate staging and may be curative in selected patients. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the literature to summarise results after surgical removal of enlarged lymph nodes in the back of the abdomen in men with testis cancer. This procedure provides accurate information on how far the cancer has spread and may provide a cure in selected patients

Questioning the Value of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Residual Lesions After Chemotherapy for Metastatic Seminoma: Results of an International Global Germ Cell Cancer Group Registry

Purpose Residual lesions after chemotherapy are frequent in metastatic seminoma. Watchful waiting is recommended for lesions < 3 cm as well as for fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-negative lesions ≥ 3 cm. Information on the optimal management of PET-positive residual lesions ≥ 3 cm is lacking. Patients and Methods We retrospectively identified 90 patients with metastatic seminoma with PET-positive residual lesions after chemotherapy. Patients with elevated α-fetoprotein or nonseminomatous histology were excluded. We analyzed the post-PET management and its impact on relapse and survival and calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) for PET. Results Median follow-up time was 29 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10 to 62 months). Median diameter of the largest residual mass was 4.9 cm (range, 1.1 to 14 cm), with masses located in the retroperitoneum (77%), pelvis (16%), mediastinum (17%), and/or lung (3%). Median time from the last day of chemotherapy to PET was 6.9 weeks (IQR, 4.4 to 9.9 weeks). Post-PET management included repeated imaging in 51 patients (57%), resection in 26 patients (29%), biopsy in nine patients (10%) and radiotherapy in four patients (4%). Histology of the resected specimen was necrosis in 21 patients (81%) and vital seminoma in five patients (19%). No biopsy revealed vital seminoma. Relapse or progression occurred in 15 patients (17%) after a median of 3.7 months (IQR, 2.5 to 4.9 months) and was found in 11 (22%) of 51 patients on repeated imaging, in two (8%) of 26 patients after resection, and in two (22%) of nine patients after biopsy. All but one patient who experienced relapse were successfully treated with salvage therapy. The PPV for FDG-PET was 23%. Conclusion FDG-PET has a low PPV for vital tumor in residual lesions after chemotherapy in patients with metastatic seminoma. This cautions against clinical decisions based on PET positivity alone

Impact of differing methodologies for serum miRNA-371a-3p assessment in stage I testicular germ cell cancer recurrence.

INTRODUCTION Current evidence shows that serum miR-371a-3p can identify disease recurrence in testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) patients and correlates with tumour load. Despite convincing evidence showing the advantages of including miR-371a-3p testing to complement and overcome the classical serum tumour markers limitations, the successful introduction of a serum miRNA based test into clinical practice has been impeded by a lack of consensus regarding optimal methodologies and lack of a universal protocol and thresholds. Herein, we investigate two quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) based pipelines in detecting disease recurrence in stage I TGCT patients under active surveillance, and compare the sensitivity and specificity for each method. METHODS Sequential serum samples collected from 33 stage I TGCT patients undergoing active surveillance were analysed for miR-371a-3p via qRT-PCR with and without an amplification step included. RESULTS Using a pre-amplified protocol, all known recurrences were detected via elevated miR-371a-3p expression, while without pre-amplification, we failed to detect recurrence in 3/10 known recurrence patients. For pre-amplified analysis, sensitivity and specificity was 90% and 94.4% respectively. Without amplification, sensitivity dropped to 60%, but exhibited 100% specificity. DISCUSSION We conclude that incorporating pre-amplification increases sensitivity of miR-371a-3p detection, but produces more false positive results. The ideal protocol for quantification of miR-371a-3p still needs to be determined. TGCT patients undergoing active surveillance may benefit from serum miR-371a-3p quantification with earlier detection of recurrences compared to current standard methods. However, larger cross-institutional studies where samples are processed and data is analysed in a standardised manner are required prior to its routine clinical implementation