How predictive is the MMSE for cognitive performance after stroke?

Cognitive deficits are commonly observed in stroke patients. Neuropsychological testing is time-consuming and not easy to administer after hospital discharge. Standardised screening measures are desirable. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the test most widely applied to screen for cognitive deficits. Despite its broad use, its predictive characteristics after stroke have not been exhaustively investigated. The aim of this study was to determine whether the MMSE is able to adequately screen for cognitive impairment and dementia after stroke and whether or not the MMSE can predict further deterioration or recovery in cognitive function over time. To this end, we studied 194 first-ever stroke patients without pre-stroke cognitive deterioration who underwent MMSEs and neuropsychological test batteries at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after stroke. The MMSE score 1 month after stroke predicted cognitive functioning at later follow-up visits. It could not predict deterioration or improvement in cognitive functioning over time. The cut-off score in the screening for 1 cognitive disturbed domain was 27/28 with a sensitivity of 0.72. The cut-off score in the screening for at least 4 impaired domains and dementia were 26/27 and 23/24 with a sensitivity of 0.82 and 0.96, respectively. The results indicated that the MMSE has modest qualities in screening for mild cognitive disturbances and is adequate in screening for moderate cognitive deficits or dementia in stroke patients 1 month after stroke. Poor performance on the MMSE is predictive for cognitive impairment in the long term. However, it cannot be used to predict further cognitive deterioration or improvement over time

Metabolikus tényezők szerepe a lacunaris agyinfarctusok kialakulásában

L

The likelihood of decreasing strokes in atrial fibrillation patients by strict application of guidelines

Despite the known increased stroke risk associated with AF and the benefit of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in high-risk patients, still similar to 20% of all ischaemic strokes are atrial fibrillation (AF) related. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of inappropriate anticoagulation in all patients admitted with AF associated ischaemic stroke and calculate the theoretical number of preventable strokes in case of proper guideline adherence and assess secondary stroke prevention at discharge. In this cross-sectional study, all patients with ischaemic strokes admitted to our hospital during May 2003-August 2006 in whom the diagnosis AF was either known or established during hospital stay were identified. We studied if their admission and discharge antithrombotic therapy was in accordance with the published guidelines. Subsequently, we calculated the number of preventable strokes in case AF patients would have received adequate antithrombotic treatment on admission. On admission, in 51% of the OAC eligible known AF patients the drug was withheld. Improved antithrombotic guideline adherence potentially would have prevented 20 out of the 89 (22%) ischaemic strokes. At discharge at least 10% of the patients were still insufficiently protected against recurrent stroke. Many known AF patients admitted with ischaemic stroke lack adequate antithrombotic treatment on admission. Antithrombotic guideline adherence in these patients has the potential to prevent a substantial number strokes. Secondary stroke prevention at discharge is also suboptimal