Hemodynamics and renal function during administration of low-dose dopamine in severely ill patients

CONTEXT: Although a large number of studies have been performed regarding the renal and hemodynamic effects of the infusion of low-dose dopamine (LDD) in severely ill patients, there is still controversy on this subject. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of dopamine (2 mug/kg/min) on systemic hemodynamics (lowest mean arterial pressure, MAP, highest heart rate, HR, central venous pressure, CVP), creatinine clearance (CLcr), diuresis and fractional sodium excretion (FENa+). TYPE OF STUDY: A non-randomized, open, prospective clinical trial. SETTING: An intensive care unit in a tertiary university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 22 patients with hemodynamic stability admitted to the intensive care unit. PROCEDURES: Patients were submitted to three two-hour periods: without dopamine (P1), with dopamine (P2) and without dopamine (P3). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The abovementioned variables were measured during each period. CLcr was assessed based upon the formula U x V/P, where U is urinary creatinine (mg/dl), V is diuresis in ml/min and P is serum creatinine (mg/dl). FENa+ was calculated based upon the formula: urinary sodium (mEq/l) x P/plasma sodium (mEq/l) x U) x 100. Results were presented as mean and standard deviation. The Student t test was used and results were considered significant if p was less than 0.05. RESULTS: Twelve patients (seven males and five females) were included, with a mean age of 55.45 years. There was no significant variation in MAP, HR, CVP, CLcr or FENa+ with a dopamine dose of 2 mug/kg/min. On the other hand, diuresis significantly increased during P2, from 225.4 to 333.9 ml. CONCLUSION: Infusion of 2 mug/kg/min of dopamine for 2 hours increases diuresis. At the doses studied, dopamine does not induce significant alterations in MAP, HR, CVP, CLcr and FENa+

Segurança do transporte intra-hospitalar: avaliação dos parâmetros hemodinâmicos e respiratórios. Estudo prospectivo de coorte

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Intrahospital transportation of mechanically ventilated patients is a high-risk situation. We aimed to determine whether transfers could be safely performed by using a transportation routine. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study with before and after evaluation. METHODS: Mechanically ventilated patients who needed transportation were included. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were measured before and after transportation. Statistical analysis consisted of variance analysis and paired Student's t test. Results were considered significant if P 5, FiO2 > 0.4 and vasoactive drug use comprised 42.4%, 24.3%, 21.6% and 33.0% of cases, respectively. Mean duration of transportation was 43.4 ± 18.9 minutes. Complications occurred in 32.4%. There was a significant increase in CO2 (before transportation, 29.6 ± 7.3 and after transportation, 34.9 ± 7.0; P = 0.000); a trend towards improved PO2/FiO2 ratio (before transportation, 318.0 ± 137.0 and after transportation, 356.8 ± 119.9; P = 0.053); increased heart rate (before transportation, 80.9 ± 18.7 and after transportation, 85.5 ± 17.6; P = 0.08); and no significant change in mean arterial blood pressure (P = 0.93). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that intrahospital transportation can be safely performed. Our low incidence of complications was possibly related to both the presence of a multidisciplinary transportation team and proper equipment.CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: O transporte intra-hospitalar de pacientes sob ventilação mecânica (VM) é uma situação sabidamente de alto risco. Nosso objetivo foi determinar se o transporte poderia ser realizado com segurança, seguindo uma rotina de transporte. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo prospectivo, de coorte único com análise antes e depois. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos pacientes sob VM que necessitaram de transporte. Os parâmetros hemodinâmicos e respiratórios foram medidos antes (AT) e após (DT) o retorno à Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Utilizou-se análise de variância e o teste t de Student. Os resultados foram considerados significativos se P 5 cmH2O, FiO2 > 0,4 ou em uso de drogas vasoativas compreenderam 42,4%, 24,3%, 21,6% e 33,0% dos casos, respectivamente. A duração média do transporte foi de 43,4 ± 18,9 min. Complicações ocorreram em 32,4% dos casos. Houve aumento significativo no CO2 (AT - 29,59 ± 7,27 e DT - 34,95 ± 7,01, P = 0,000), tendência na melhora da relação PO2/FiO2 após o transporte (AT- 318,0 ± 137,0 e DT- 356,8 ± 119,9, P = 0,053) e aumento na freqüência cardíaca (AT- 80,9 ± 18,7 e DT- 85,5 ± 17.6, P = 0,08), sem alterações significativas na pressão arterial média (P = 0,93). CONCLUSÃO: Estes resultados sugerem que o transporte intra-hospitalar pode ser executado com segurança. Nossa baixa incidência das complicações é relacionada possivelmente à presença de uma equipe multidisciplinar de transporte e ao equipamento apropriado.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de MedicinaUNIFESP, EPMSciEL

Safety in intrahospital transportation: evaluation of respiratory and hemodynamic parameters. A prospective cohort study

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Intrahospital transportation of mechanically ventilated patients is a high-risk situation. We aimed to determine whether transfers could be safely performed by using a transportation routine. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study with "before and after" evaluation. METHODS: Mechanically ventilated patients who needed transportation were included. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were measured before and after transportation. Statistical analysis consisted of variance analysis and paired Student's t test. Results were considered significant if P 5, FiO2 > 0.4 and vasoactive drug use comprised 42.4%, 24.3%, 21.6% and 33.0% of cases, respectively. Mean duration of transportation was 43.4 ± 18.9 minutes. Complications occurred in 32.4%. There was a significant increase in CO2 (before transportation, 29.6 ± 7.3 and after transportation, 34.9 ± 7.0; P = 0.000); a trend towards improved PO2/FiO2 ratio (before transportation, 318.0 ± 137.0 and after transportation, 356.8 ± 119.9; P = 0.053); increased heart rate (before transportation, 80.9 ± 18.7 and after transportation, 85.5 ± 17.6; P = 0.08); and no significant change in mean arterial blood pressure (P = 0.93). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that intrahospital transportation can be safely performed. Our low incidence of complications was possibly related to both the presence of a multidisciplinary transportation team and proper equipment

Qualidade e humanização do atendimento em Medicina Intensiva. Qual a visão dos familiares? Quality and humanization of the attendance in Intensive Care Medicine. What the parents think's?

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Este estudo teve por objetivo descrever a avaliação pelos visitantes da qualidade de atendimento prestada em uma unidade de terapia intensiva geral de um hospital universitário de nível terciário. MÉTODO: Foi elaborado um questionário para avaliação da qualidade de atendimento da Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Foram incluídos familiares de pacientes que se encontravam internados há mais de 48 horas, e que já haviam visitado o paciente uma vez ou mais durante o período. Os critérios de exclusão foram familiares de pacientes internados há menos de 48 h, familiares que não haviam visitado o paciente pelo menos uma vez ou que não desejavam responder ao questionário por quaisquer motivos de ordem pessoal. Os familiares foram entrevistados de maneira pessoal e os entrevistadores não faziam parte da equipe de atendimento do paciente. RESULTADOS: Foram entrevistados 100 familiares; a queixa mais freqüente e que, portanto gerou maior incômodo pela internação na UTI, referiu-se ao estado geral do paciente em 28% das entrevistas. Um total de 96% considerou a qualidade da equipe médica como ótima ou boa. No entanto, 15% declararam insatisfeitos com as informações médicas prestadas e outros 5%, apesar de afirmar satisfação, reclamaram por ter de conversar com diferentes médicos (plantonistas) a cada dia. CONCLUSÕES: Falhas na comunicação surgiram como principal fator apontado para a qualidade insatisfatória do serviço pela visão do familiar. Embora não se possa comparar o grau de satisfação entre trabalhos distintos publicados, devido a diferenças nos métodos, considera-se que na casuística apresentada, o reconhecimento dos mais freqüentes fatores de descontentamento ou crítica, pode apontar melhorias na qualidade do atendimento prestado.<br>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe the view of family members about the quality of care given in a general intensive care unit of a university hospital. METHODS: A questionnaire to evaluate the level of satisfaction with the care was elaborated. The study included family members of patients with a length of stay more than 48h who already had visited the patient one time or more during the period. The exclusion criterion was family of admitted patients with less than 48h of ICU stay, family members who had not visited the patient at all or family members who did not desire to answer the questionnaire for any personal reason. RESULTS: There were 100 relatives interviewed face to face. The most frequent complaint that had generated the greatest concern was the general status of the patient, present in 28% of the interviews. A total of 96% considered the quality of the medical team as excellent or good. However, 15% declared to be unsatisfied with the medical information given and the other 5%, although admitting satisfaction, complained about having to talk with different doctors each day. CONCLUSIONS: Imperfections in the communication appears as the main predictor of unsatisfactory quality of the service in the view of the family members. Although one cannot directly compare the degree of satisfaction between distinct studies due to different methodologies, we considered that in the presented sample the recognition of the most frequent factors of dissatisfaction can point out areas for improvement in the quality of care offered in the ICU