5 research outputs found
Chitogel with deferiprone following endoscopic sinus surgery: improved wound healing and microbiome
BackgroundAdhesion formation, sinus ostial narrowing, and presence of pathogenic bacteria are associated with poor outcomes following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis. Chitogel has been shown to improve wound healing, restore a healthier microbiome, and reduce post-operative infections post ESS. Deferiprone has antibacterial properties and has been shown to reduce adhesion formation. The aim of the study was to assess whether the addition of low concentration deferiprone to Chitogel further improves surgical outcomes following ESS compared with Chitogel alone.MethodsIn this double-blinded trial, 45 patients undergoing ESS were prospectively recruited. At the end of the surgery, patients were randomised to receive Chitogel alone, Chitogel with 1â
mM of deferiprone, or Chitogel with 5â
mM of deferiprone to one side of the sinuses (allowing the other side to serve as control). Patients underwent routine follow-ups with symptom questionnaires and nasoendoscopies performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks post-operatively. Sinus ostial measurements, microbiology, and microbiome swabs from bilateral middle meatuses were collected intraoperatively and at 12 weeks post-operatively.ResultsA significant improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the sinuses and frontal ostial patency was noted at 12 weeks post-operatively (pâ<â0.05) in all three treatment groups compared with the control. There was no significant difference noted between patients who received Chitogel alone and those who received Chitogel with 1 or 5â
mM deferiprone.ConclusionChitogel alone, Chitogel with 1â
mM deferiprone, and Chitogel with 5â
mM deferiprone used following ESS led to a significant improvement in endoscopic appearance of the sinuses and frontal ostial preservation at 12 weeks post-operatively. No significant difference was found with the addition of deferiprone to Chitogel
Datasheet1_Chitogel with deferiprone following endoscopic sinus surgery: improved wound healing and microbiome.pdf
BackgroundAdhesion formation, sinus ostial narrowing, and presence of pathogenic bacteria are associated with poor outcomes following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis. Chitogel has been shown to improve wound healing, restore a healthier microbiome, and reduce post-operative infections post ESS. Deferiprone has antibacterial properties and has been shown to reduce adhesion formation. The aim of the study was to assess whether the addition of low concentration deferiprone to Chitogel further improves surgical outcomes following ESS compared with Chitogel alone.MethodsIn this double-blinded trial, 45 patients undergoing ESS were prospectively recruited. At the end of the surgery, patients were randomised to receive Chitogel alone, Chitogel with 1â
mM of deferiprone, or Chitogel with 5â
mM of deferiprone to one side of the sinuses (allowing the other side to serve as control). Patients underwent routine follow-ups with symptom questionnaires and nasoendoscopies performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks post-operatively. Sinus ostial measurements, microbiology, and microbiome swabs from bilateral middle meatuses were collected intraoperatively and at 12 weeks post-operatively.ResultsA significant improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the sinuses and frontal ostial patency was noted at 12 weeks post-operatively (pâConclusionChitogel alone, Chitogel with 1â
mM deferiprone, and Chitogel with 5â
mM deferiprone used following ESS led to a significant improvement in endoscopic appearance of the sinuses and frontal ostial preservation at 12 weeks post-operatively. No significant difference was found with the addition of deferiprone to Chitogel.</p
SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study
Background: Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could support safer elective surgery. Vaccine numbers are limited so this study aimed to inform their prioritization by modelling.
Methods: The primary outcome was the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one COVID-19-related death in 1 year. NNVs were based on postoperative SARS-CoV-2 rates and mortality in an international cohort study (surgical patients), and community SARS-CoV-2 incidence and case fatality data (general population). NNV estimates were stratified by age (18-49, 50-69, 70 or more years) and type of surgery. Best- and worst-case scenarios were used to describe uncertainty.
Results: NNVs were more favourable in surgical patients than the general population. The most favourable NNVs were in patients aged 70 years or more needing cancer surgery (351; best case 196, worst case 816) or non-cancer surgery (733; best case 407, worst case 1664). Both exceeded the NNV in the general population (1840; best case 1196, worst case 3066). NNVs for surgical patients remained favourable at a range of SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates in sensitivity analysis modelling. Globally, prioritizing preoperative vaccination of patients needing elective surgery ahead of the general population could prevent an additional 58 687 (best case 115 007, worst case 20 177) COVID-19-related deaths in 1 year.
Conclusion: As global roll out of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination proceeds, patients needing elective surgery should be prioritized ahead of the general population