Patient and public involvement in a study of multimedia clinical trial information for children, young people and families

© 2020 Sheridan, Preston, Stones, Ainsworth, Taylor, Challinor, Ainsworth, Martin-Kerry, Brady and Knapp. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.There is increasing recognition of the need to involve the public in health research, but accounts of how best to achieve this are scarce. This article describes public involvement in the TRials Engagement in Children and Adolescents (TRECA) study, which is developing and evaluating multimedia information resources to inform children, young people and their familes about clinical trials. A dedicated group of young people with long-term health conditions and their parents met regularly throughout the study; further involvement was sought when specific input was required. Review of formal impact records and informal discussions highlighted how public involvement can positively influence research practice and the people involved. By detailing the methods of involvement used, this work also provides guidance for successfully implementing public involvement in research, and highlights challenges that should be considered in future research projects.Peer reviewe

Management and treatment of children, young people and adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope

Lay Summary: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a lifelong condition in which the immune system damages the body’s own tissues, causing various symptoms including rashes, hair loss, mouth ulcers, joint pain and overwhelming tiredness. It can also affect major organs including the kidneys, heart, lungs and brain. SLE can present during childhood, but most commonly affects young and middle-aged females. It is approximately nine times more common in females than males. The disease can lead to disability, poor quality of life and even death in severe cases. Treatments can often be difficult to tolerate and can cause both short- and long-term side effects. Guidelines developed by the British Society for Rheumatology aim to provide guidance for diagnosing and treating people with SLE. This is necessary to ensure that the most up-to-date approach is followed, utilising the safest and most effective treatments. This article describes the plan for a guideline in SLE that is being updated to cover new evidence that has been published since 2017 relating to the treatment and management of SLE. The guideline will take a whole life course approach, from childhood to adulthood, and is being undertaken by a working group consisting of paediatric and adult rheumatologists and nephrologists, SLE experts, general practitioners, specialist nurses and other healthcare professionals, together with people with SLE and representatives from patient organizations. The guideline will be developed using the methods and processes outlined in the British Society for Rheumatology document ‘Creating Clinical Guidelines: Our Protocol’

Convalescent plasma in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised controlled, open-label, platform trial

SummaryBackground Azithromycin has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 on the basis of its immunomodulatoryactions. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.Methods In this randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19Therapy [RECOVERY]), several possible treatments were compared with usual care in patients admitted to hospitalwith COVID-19 in the UK. The trial is underway at 176 hospitals in the UK. Eligible and consenting patients wererandomly allocated to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus azithromycin 500 mg once perday by mouth or intravenously for 10 days or until discharge (or allocation to one of the other RECOVERY treatmentgroups). Patients were assigned via web-based simple (unstratified) randomisation with allocation concealment andwere twice as likely to be randomly assigned to usual care than to any of the active treatment groups. Participants andlocal study staff were not masked to the allocated treatment, but all others involved in the trial were masked to theoutcome data during the trial. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, assessed in the intention-to-treatpopulation. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, 50189673, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04381936.Findings Between April 7 and Nov 27, 2020, of 16 442 patients enrolled in the RECOVERY trial, 9433 (57%) wereeligible and 7763 were included in the assessment of azithromycin. The mean age of these study participants was65·3 years (SD 15·7) and approximately a third were women (2944 [38%] of 7763). 2582 patients were randomlyallocated to receive azithromycin and 5181 patients were randomly allocated to usual care alone. Overall,561 (22%) patients allocated to azithromycin and 1162 (22%) patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days(rate ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·87–1·07; p=0·50). No significant difference was seen in duration of hospital stay (median10 days [IQR 5 to >28] vs 11 days [5 to >28]) or the proportion of patients discharged from hospital alive within 28 days(rate ratio 1·04, 95% CI 0·98–1·10; p=0·19). Among those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, nosignificant difference was seen in the proportion meeting the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilationor death (risk ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·87–1·03; p=0·24).Interpretation In patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, azithromycin did not improve survival or otherprespecified clinical outcomes. Azithromycin use in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 should be restrictedto patients in whom there is a clear antimicrobial indication

Perceptions and acceptability of microsampling in children and young people: a single-centre survey

BackgroundThe use of at home microsampling devices, such as dried aliquots of blood and urine, for scientific research has expanded in recent years. These devices collect small volumes of biofluids which air dry and can be posted to central laboratories. In general, they are cheaper and more convenient, saving patients travel time and freeing up staff. In adult populations, this sampling method is well perceived, with &gt;90% of samples being of adequate size and quality for scientific research. However, little literature on microsampling in paediatric populations exists. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions and acceptability of microsampling in children and young people.MethodsOnline patient and public involvement was obtained by attending the Generation R Young Person’s Advisory Group Liverpool, to explore the perceptions of at home microsampling. During the session, the rationale and use of microsampling was demonstrated. The participants provided informal feedback during the interactive session and completed a short online questionnaire.ResultsA total of 13 children and young people attended the event and they were aged 10–17 years, of these 10 responded to an online questionnaire. The general feedback on microsampling was positive with 80% of respondents indicating they would be willing to participate in at home microsampling studies. Furthermore, 100% respondents reported being willing to provide both biofluids on a monthly basis and 40% would be willing to provide dried urine samples weekly.ConclusionsChildren and young people are supportive of at home microsampling for research purposes and this offers the possibility of widening participation to research.</jats:sec

Management and treatment of children, young people and adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope.

Funder: British Society for Rheumatology; DOI: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000568The objective of this guideline is to provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for the management of SLE that builds upon the existing treatment guideline for adults living with SLE published in 2017. This will incorporate advances in the assessment, diagnosis, monitoring, non-pharmacological and pharmacological management of SLE. General approaches to management as well as organ-specific treatment, including lupus nephritis and cutaneous lupus, will be covered. This will be the first guideline in SLE using a whole life course approach from childhood through adolescence and adulthood. The guideline will be developed with people with SLE as an important target audience in addition to healthcare professionals. It will include guidance related to emerging approved therapies and account for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Health Service England clinical commissioning policies and national guidance relevant to SLE. The guideline will be developed using the methods and rigorous processes outlined in 'Creating Clinical Guidelines: Our Protocol' by the British Society for Rheumatology

Management and treatment of children, young people and adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope

The objective of this guideline is to provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for the management of SLE that builds upon the existing treatment guideline for adults living with SLE published in 2017. This will incorporate advances in the assessment, diagnosis, monitoring, non-pharmacological and pharmacological management of SLE. General approaches to management as well as organ-specific treatment, including lupus nephritis and cutaneous lupus, will be covered. This will be the first guideline in SLE using a whole life course approach from childhood through adolescence and adulthood. The guideline will be developed with people with SLE as an important target audience in addition to healthcare professionals. It will include guidance related to emerging approved therapies and account for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Health Service England clinical commissioning policies and national guidance relevant to SLE. The guideline will be developed using the methods and rigorous processes outlined in ‘Creating Clinical Guidelines: Our Protocol’ by the British Society for Rheumatology

Management and treatment of children, young people and adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope

Funder: British Society for Rheumatology; DOI: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000568Abstract The objective of this guideline is to provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for the management of SLE that builds upon the existing treatment guideline for adults living with SLE published in 2017. This will incorporate advances in the assessment, diagnosis, monitoring, non-pharmacological and pharmacological management of SLE. General approaches to management as well as organ-specific treatment, including lupus nephritis and cutaneous lupus, will be covered. This will be the first guideline in SLE using a whole life course approach from childhood through adolescence and adulthood. The guideline will be developed with people with SLE as an important target audience in addition to healthcare professionals. It will include guidance related to emerging approved therapies and account for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Health Service England clinical commissioning policies and national guidance relevant to SLE. The guideline will be developed using the methods and rigorous processes outlined in ‘Creating Clinical Guidelines: Our Protocol’ by the British Society for Rheumatology.</jats:p