Prevalence of adrenal masses in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>To date, there have been no reports on the prevalence of adrenal masses in type 2 diabetic patients. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in type 2 diabetic patients in Japan.</p> <p>Subjects</p> <p>We retrospectively evaluated the presence of adrenal masses using abdominal CT scans in 304 type 2 diabetic patients. In those with adrenal masses, we examined the hormone production capacity of the adrenal mass.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Fourteen patients (4.6%) had an adrenal mass. Hormonal analysis identified one case as having subclinical Cushing's syndrome, two with primary aldosteronism. Eleven cases had non-functioning masses.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The reported prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in normal subjects is 0.6-4.0% in abdominal CT scan series. Our results show a relatively high prevalence of adrenal tumors in diabetic patients. On the other hand, the frequency of functional adenoma in diabetic patients is 21.4%, which is similar to that of normal subjects.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Although further studies are needed to evaluate the prevalence of adrenal tumors in diabetic patients, our data suggest that evaluation of the presence of adrenal masses may be needed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.</p

Why Are Clinicians Not Embracing the Results from Pivotal Clinical Trials in Severe Sepsis? A Bayesian Analysis

BACKGROUND: Five pivotal clinical trials (Intensive Insulin Therapy; Recombinant Human Activated Protein C [rhAPC]; Low-Tidal Volume; Low-Dose Steroid; Early Goal-Directed Therapy [EGDT]) demonstrated mortality reduction in patients with severe sepsis and expert guidelines have recommended them to clinical practice. Yet, the adoption of these therapies remains low among clinicians. OBJECTIVES: We selected these five trials and asked: Question 1--What is the current probability that the new therapy is not better than the standard of care in my patient with severe sepsis? Question 2--What is the current probability of reducing the relative risk of death (RRR) of my patient with severe sepsis by meaningful clinical thresholds (RRR >15%; >20%; >25%)? METHODS: Bayesian methodologies were applied to this study. Odds ratio (OR) was considered for Question 1, and RRR was used for Question 2. We constructed prior distributions (enthusiastic; mild, moderate, and severe skeptic) based on various effective sample sizes of other relevant clinical trials (unfavorable evidence). Posterior distributions were calculated by combining the prior distributions and the data from pivotal trials (favorable evidence). MAIN FINDINGS: Answer 1--The analysis based on mild skeptic prior shows beneficial results with the Intensive Insulin, rhAPC, and Low-Tidal Volume trials, but not with the Low-Dose Steroid and EGDT trials. All trials' results become unacceptable by the analyses using moderate or severe skeptic priors. Answer 2--If we aim for a RRR>15%, the mild skeptic analysis shows that the current probability of reducing death by this clinical threshold is 88% for the Intensive Insulin, 62-65% for the Low-Tidal Volume, rhAPC, EGDT trials, and 17% for the Low-Dose Steroid trial. The moderate and severe skeptic analyses show no clinically meaningful reduction in the risk of death for all trials. If we aim for a RRR >20% or >25%, all probabilities of benefits become lower independent of the degree of skepticism. CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical threshold analysis offers a new bedside tool to be directly applied to the care of patients with severe sepsis. Our results demonstrate that the strength of evidence (statistical and clinical) is weak for all trials, particularly for the Low-Dose Steroid and EGDT trials. It is essential to replicate the results of each of these five clinical trials in confirmatory studies if we want to provide patient care based on scientifically sound evidence

Assessing adrenal insufficiency of corticosteroid secretion using free versus total cortisol levels in critical illness

To study the value of free versus total cortisol levels in assessing relative adrenal insufficiency during critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency. A prospective study in a mixed intensive care unit from 2004 to 2007. We consecutively included 49 septic and 63 non-septic patients with treatment-insensitive hypotension in whom an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) test (250 μg) was performed. Serum total and free cortisol (equilibrium dialysis), corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) and albumin were assessed. Although a low CBG resulted in a high free cortisol level relative to total cortisol, free and total cortisol and their increases were well correlated (r = 0.77-0.79, P < 0.001). In sepsis, hypoalbuminemia did not affect total and free cortisol, and increases in total cortisol upon ACTH predicted increases in free cortisol regardless of low binding proteins. In non-sepsis, total cortisol was lower with than without hypoalbuminemia; free cortisol did not differ, since hypoalbuminemia concurred with a low CBG. Increases in total cortisol depended less on binding proteins than on raw levels. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting increases in free from total cortisol were 0.93-0.97 in sepsis and 0.79-0.85 in non-sepsis (P = 0.044 or lower for sepsis vs. non-sepsis). Although the biologically active free cortisol fraction depends on binding proteins, total cortisol correlates to free cortisol in treatment-insensitive hypotension during critical illness. In sepsis, albumin is not an important binding molecule. Subnormal increments in total cortisol upon ACTH suffice in assessing relative adrenal insufficiency, particularly in sepsi

LCI699, a potent 11?-hydroxylase inhibitor, normalizes urinary cortisol in patients with Cushing's disease: results from a multicenter, proof-of-concept study.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical features and increased mortality associated with Cushing's syndrome result from a chronic excess of circulating cortisol. As LCI699 potently inhibits 11β-hydroxylase, which catalyzes the final step of cortisol synthesis, it is a potential new treatment for Cushing's disease, the most common cause of endogenous Cushing's syndrome. METHODS: Adult patients with moderate-to-severe Cushing's disease (urinary free cortisol [UFC] levels >1.5 × ULN [upper limit of normal]) received oral LCI699 for 10 weeks in this proof-of-concept study. LCI699 was initiated at 4 mg/d in two equal doses; the dose was escalated every 14 days to 10, 20, 40, and 100 mg/d until UFC normalized, whereupon the dose was maintained until treatment ended (day 70). The primary endpoint was UFC ≤ ULN or a ≥50% decrease from baseline at day 70. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled and completed the study. Baseline UFC ranged over 1.6-17.0 × ULN. All 12 patients achieved UFC ≤ULN or a ≥50% decrease from baseline at day 70; 11 (92%) had normal UFC levels at that time. After treatment discontinuation (day 84), UFC was >ULN in 10 patients with available measurements. Mean 11-deoxycortisol, 11-deoxycorticosterone, and adrenocorticotropic hormone levels increased during treatment and declined after discontinuation. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased from baseline by 10.0 and 6.0 mmHg, respectively. LCI699 was generally well tolerated; most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate. The most common AEs included fatigue (7/12), nausea (5/12), and headache (3/12). No serious drug-related AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: LCI699 was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with Cushing's disease enrolled in this proof-of-concept study

LCI699, a potent 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, normalizes urinary cortisol in patients with Cushing's disease: results from a multicenter, proof-of-concept study.

The clinical features and increased mortality associated with Cushing's syndrome result from a chronic excess of circulating cortisol. As LCI699 potently inhibits 11β-hydroxylase, which catalyzes the final step of cortisol synthesis, it is a potential new treatment for Cushing's disease, the most common cause of endogenous Cushing's syndrome. Methods: Adult patients with moderate-to-severe Cushing's disease (UFC levels >1.5xULN) received oral LCI699 for 10 weeks in this proof-of-concept study. LCI699 was initiated at 4 mg/day in two equal doses; the dose was escalated every 14 days to 10, 20, 40 and 100 mg/day until UFC normalized, whereupon the dose was maintained until treatment ended (day 70). The primary endpoint was UFC≤ULN or a ≥50% decrease from baseline at day 70. Results: Twelve patients were enrolled and completed the study. Baseline UFC ranged over 1.6-17.0xULN. All 12 patients achieved UFC≤ULN or a ≥50% decrease from baseline at day 70; 11 (92%) had normal UFC levels at that time. After treatment discontinuation (day 84), UFC was >ULN in 10 patients with available measurements. Mean 11-deoxycortisol, 11-deoxycorticosterone and adrenocorticotropic hormone levels increased during treatment and declined after discontinuation. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased from baseline by 10.0 and 6.0 mmHg, respectively. LCI699 was generally well tolerated; most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate. The most common AEs included fatigue (7/12), nausea (5/12) and headache (3/12). No serious drug-related AEs were reported. Conclusion: LCI699 was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with Cushing's disease enrolled in this proof-of-concept study