Evaluation of patients with a recent clinical fracture and osteoporosis, a multidisciplinary approach

The aetiology of osteoporotic fractures is multifactorial, but little is known about the way to evaluate patients with a recent clinical fracture for the presence of secondary osteoporosis

Progressive vertebral deformities despite unchanged bone mineral density in patients with sarcoidosis: a 4-year follow-up study

To evaluate the incidence of new and/or progressive vertebral deformities and changes in bone mineral density, we re-examined 66 patients with sarcoidosis after a follow-up period of four years. In 17 subjects (26%) new and/or progressive vertebral deformities were found, though BMD did not change significantly. INTRODUCTION: Previous studies from our group have shown that morphometric vertebral deformities suggestive of fractures can be found in 20% of patients with sarcoidosis, despite a normal bone mineral density (BMD). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of new and/or progressive vertebral deformities and the evolution of BMD during the course of this disease. METHODS: BMD of the hip (DXA) and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) with lateral single energy densitometry was performed at baseline and after 45 months in 66 patients with sarcoidosis. Potential predictors of new/ progressive vertebral deformities were assessed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The BMD of the total group was unchanged after follow-up. The prevalence of vertebral deformities increased from 20 to 32% (p < 0.05); in 17 subjects (26%) new or progressive vertebral deformities were diagnosed. A lower T-score of the femoral neck [(OR = 2.5 (CI: 1.0-5.9), p < 0.05)] and mother with a hip fracture [(OR = 14.1 (CI: 1.4-142.6), p < 0.05)] were independent predictors of new/progressive deformities. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with sarcoidosis the number of vertebral deformities increases in the course of this disease, despite unchanged BMD. The combination of low normal BMD and family history of fragility fractures confers an increased risk of the incidence of these deformities

The interaction of growth hormone releasing hormone with other hypothalamic hormones on the release of anterior pituitary hormones.

To determine whether the 29 amino-acid fragment of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) can be combined with other hypothalamic releasing hormones in a single test of anterior pituitary reserve, the responses of anterior pituitary hormones to combinations of an i.v. bolus of GHRH(1-29)NH2 or saline with an i.v. bolus of either LH releasing hormone (LHRH) plus TRH, ovine CRH(oCRH) or saline were studied. Each infusion of GHRH(1-29)NH2 resulted in a rapid increment of the plasma GH value. Infusion of GHRH(1-29)NH2 also caused a small and transient rise in plasma PRL, but no change in the integrated PRL response. The combination of GHRH(1-29)NH2 with LHRH plus TRH caused a larger increment of peak and integrated plasma TSH levels than LHRH plus TRH alone. GHRH(1-29)NH2 did not affect the release of other anterior pituitary hormones after infusion with oCRH or LHRH plus TRH. Because of the finding of potentiation of the TSH-releasing activity of LHRH plus TRH by GHRH(1-29)NH2, the study was extended to the investigation of TSH release after infusion of TRH in combination with either GHRH(1-29)NH2 or GHRH(1-40). In this study the combination of TRH with both GHRH preparations also caused a larger increment of the peak and integrated plasma TSH levels than TRH alone. It is concluded that GHRH(1-29)NH2 possesses moderate PRL-releasing activity apart from GH-releasing activity. In addition, GHRH potentiates the TSH-releasing activity of TRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS

Immunochemical investigation of insulinomas for islet amyloid polypeptide and insulin:evidence for differential synthesis and storage

An affinity purified antibody to fragment 14-29 of islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) has been prepared. This antibody, which does not cross-react with the related molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide, was used to investigate immunochemically the presence of IAPP in normal and neoplastic human pancreatic endocrine tissue. The pattern of IAPP staining in normal pancreas mirrors that of insulin, although slight differences were observed. In neoplastic tissue, IAPP was found in 16 out of 19 tumours that were positive for insulin, and was absent from one tumour negative for insulin. In some cases there were differences in the staining patterns of IAPP and insulin. These results suggest that the synthesis and secretion of IAPP and insulin are not inter-dependent and support the concept that IAPP has a discrete biological function. Islet amyloid polypeptide was found in six out of six insulinoma amyloid deposits, suggesting that the peptide is an invariable component of these deposits. Over-expression of IAPP, with aberrant processing and/or secretion, may be the causative factor for amyloid deposition in insulinomas and in the islets of type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetic patients. Investigation of patients with insulinomas and of insulin cells in culture and tissue sections may help to clarify the biological function of IAPP