Towards spill-free in-bag morcellation: a health failure mode and effects analysis

Cervix cance

Preoperative predictors for residual tumor after surgery in patients with ovarian carcinoma

Objectives: Suboptimal debulking (>1 cm residual tumor) results in poor survival rates for patients with an advanced stage of ovarian cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop a prediction model, based on simple preoperative parameters, for patients with an advanced stage of ovarian cancer who are at risk of suboptimal cytoreduction despite maximal surgical effort. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 187 consecutive patients with a suspected clinical diagnosis of advanced-stage ovarian cancer undergoing upfront debulking between January 1998 and December 2003. Preoperative parameters were Karnofsky performance status, ascites and serum concentrations of CA 125, hemoglobin, albumin, LDH and blood platelets. The main outcome parameter was residual tumor >1 cm. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was employed for testing possible prediction models. A clinically applicable graphic model (nomogram) for this prediction was to be developed. Results: Serum concentrations of CA 125 and blood platelets in the group with residual tumor >1 cm were higher in comparison to the optimally cytoreduced group (p 1 cm based on serum levels of CA 125 and albumin was established. Conclusion: Postoperative residual tumor despite maximal surgical effort can be predicted by preoperative CA 125 and serum albumin levels. With a nomogram based on these two parameters, probability of postoperative residual tumor in each individual patient can be predicted. This proposed nomogram may be valuable in daily routine practice for counseling and to select treatment modality. Copyrigh

Re: Further data on the usefulness of sentinel lymph node identification and ultrastaging in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Jan;88(1):29-34.

Item does not contain fulltex

"Cutaneous-type" angiosarcoma arising in a mature cystic teratoma of the ovary

Benign and malignant somatic tumours arising in mature cystic teratomas of the ovary are a rare but recognised phenomenon. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common somatic malignancy arising in ovarian teratomas, although many other types of tumour h

Psychologic impact of follow-up after low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVE: To investigate the psychological consequences of hCG measurements during follow-up in patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease. The length of follow-up of patients with molar pregnancy and spontaneous normalization of the hCG level is currently discussed, in consideration of the low incidence of recurrent disease. STUDY DESIGN: Patients registered in the Dutch Central Registry of Hydatidiform Mole between January 2006 and December 2007 were eligible for this study. Patients received a questionnaire containing questions about follow-up and anxiety and stress during this period. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were eligible for the study. An inverted correlation (r = -0.35, p = 0.003) was found between the age of patients and the level of anxiety. Anxious patients scored higher for fear of recurrence (r = 0.49, p < 0.0001), of infertility (r = 0.40, p = 0.001) and of conceiving again (r = 0.30, p = 0.01). They experienced the measurements as a burden (r = 0.35, p = 0.003). Fewer patients (24%) were insecure before the monthly hCG measurement, compared to 51% during weekly measurements. The majority of women (80%) completed the follow-up and confirmed that they would come for weekly and monthly hCG measurements if it were optional. CONCLUSION: Follow-up after low-risk GTD has psychologic consequences but provides reassurance as well. Therefore, women tend to accept the offered surveillance and refrain from pregnancy. Women with GTD should be counseled about the minor risk of recurrence and the consequences of follow-up

What doctors and patients think about false-negative sentinel lymph nodes in vulvar cancer

The sentinel lymph node procedure is a relatively new, minimally-invasive method for the assessment of nodal status in malignancies such as breast cancer, cutaneous melanoma and vulvar cancer. Although highly accurate, this new method is inevitably associated with a certain false-negative rate, possibly leading to worse survival in a small subset of patients. The clinical implementation of the sentinel lymph node procedure is therefore a matter of ongoing debate, especially among doctors. The aim of this study was to assess opinions on the acceptable false-negative rate of the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with vulvar cancer, who in the past had undergone standard routine radical vulvectomy and complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (and frequently experienced complications), and in gynecologists treating patients with vulvar cancer. Structured questionnaires were sent to both patients and gynecologists. The patients had been treated for vulvar cancer between 1985 and 7993, and were all in complete remission with a median follow-up of 118 months (range: 76-185). Questions to the patients dealt with experienced side-effects of the standard treatment and opinion on the acceptable false-negative rate of the sentinel lymph node procedure. The response rate among patients was 91% (1061117). Forty per cent of the patients experienced one or more infections in the legs (cellulitis) and 49% of the patients still experience either severe pain and/or severe lymphedema in the legs Sixty-six per cent of the patients preferred complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in preference to a 5 % false-negative rate of the sentinel lymph node procedure of 5%. Their preference was not related to age or the side-effects they had experienced. The response rate among gynecologists was 80% (801100), of whom 60% were willing to accept a 5-20% false-negative rate of the sentinel lymph node procedure. While gynecologists may consider the sentinel lymph node procedure to be a promising diagnostic tool, the majority of vulvar cancer patients, who have undergone complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in the past and have frequently experienced complications would not advise introduction of this technique because they do not want to take any risk of missing a lymph node metastasis

Pitfalls in the sentinel lymph node procedure in vulvar cancer.

Contains fulltext : 57453.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing interest among gynecologic oncologists to implement the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure in vulvar cancer patients in clinical practice. However, the safety of this promising method of staging still has to be proven in a randomized trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two vulvar cancer patients are reported to illustrate pitfalls in the sentinel lymph node procedure. RESULTS: The phenomena of bypassing the sentinel lymph node and confusion about the number of removed sentinel lymph nodes are presented and discussed. CONCLUSION: Gynecological oncologists who perform the sentinel lymph node procedure in vulvar cancer patients should perform this technique by following a strict protocol and within the protection of a clinical trial