44 research outputs found
Investigating Differences between Graphical and Textual Declarative Process Models
Declarative approaches to business process modeling are regarded as well
suited for highly volatile environments, as they enable a high degree of
flexibility. However, problems in understanding declarative process models
often impede their adoption. Particularly, a study revealed that aspects that
are present in both imperative and declarative process modeling languages at a
graphical level-while having different semantics-cause considerable troubles.
In this work we investigate whether a notation that does not contain graphical
lookalikes, i.e., a textual notation, can help to avoid this problem. Even
though a textual representation does not suffer from lookalikes, in our
empirical study it performed worse in terms of error rate, duration and mental
effort, as the textual representation forces the reader to mentally merge the
textual information. Likewise, subjects themselves expressed that the graphical
representation is easier to understand
Using Insights from Cognitive Neuroscience to Investigate the Effects of Event-Driven Process Chains on Process Model Comprehension
Business process models have been adopted by enterprises for more than a decade. Especially for domain experts, the comprehension of process models constitutes a challenging task that needs to be mastered when creating or reading these models. This paper presents the results we obtained from an eye tracking experiment on process model comprehension. In detail, individuals with either no or advanced expertise in process modeling were confronted with models expressed in terms of Event-driven Process Chains (EPCs), reflecting different levels of difficulty. The first results of this experiment confirm recent findings from one of our previous experiments on the reading and comprehension of process models. On one hand, independent from their level of exper-tise, all individuals face similar patterns, when being confronted with process models exceeding a certain level of difficulty. On the other, it appears that process models expressed in terms of EPCs are perceived differently compared to process models specified in the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). In the end, their generalization needs to be confirmed by additional empirical experiments. The presented expe-riment continues a series of experiments that aim to unravel the factors fostering the comprehension of business process models by using methods and theories stemming from the field of cognitive neuroscience and psychology
Annual report 93
SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:1482.180(1993) / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo