Dielectron widths of the S-, D-vector bottomonium states

The dielectron widths of $\Upsilon(nS) (n=1,...,7)$ and vector decay constants are calculated using the Relativistic String Hamiltonian with a universal interaction. For $\Upsilon(nS) (n=1,2,3)$ the dielectron widths and their ratios are obtained in full agreement with the latest CLEO data. For $\Upsilon(10580)$ and $\Upsilon(11020)$ a good agreement with experiment is reached only if the 4S--3D mixing (with a mixing angle $\theta=27^\circ\pm 4^\circ$) and 6S--5D mixing (with $\theta=40^\circ\pm 5^\circ$) are taken into account. The possibility to observe higher "mixed $D$-wave" resonances, $\tilde\Upsilon(n {}^3D_1)$ with $n=3,4,5$ is discussed. In particular, $\tilde\Upsilon(\approx 11120)$, originating from the pure $5 {}^3D_1$ state, can acquire a rather large dielectron width, $\sim 130$ eV, so that this resonance may become manifest in the $e^+e^-$ experiments. On the contrary, the widths of pure $D$-wave states are very small, $\Gamma_{ee}(n{}^3 D_1) \leq 2$ eV.Comment: 13 pages, no figure

The Hyperfine Splittings in Heavy-Light Mesons and Quarkonia

Hyperfine splittings (HFS) are calculated within the Field Correlator Method, taking into account relativistic corrections. The HFS in bottomonium and the $B_q$ (q=n,s) mesons are shown to be in full agreement with experiment if a universal coupling $\alpha_{HF}=0.310$ is taken in perturbative spin-spin potential. It gives $M(B^*)-M(B)=45.7(3)$ MeV, $M(B_s^*)-M(B_s)=46.7(3)$ MeV ($n_f=4$), while in bottomonium $\Delta_{HF}(b\bar b)=M(\Upsilon(9460))-M(\eta_b(1S))=63.4$ MeV for $n_f=4$ and 71.1 MeV for $n_f=5$ are obtained; just latter agrees with recent BaBar data. For unobserved excited states we predict $M(\Upsilon(2S))-M(\eta_b(2S))=36(2)$ MeV, $M(\Upsilon(3S))-M(\eta(3S))=28(2)$ MeV, and also $M(B_c^*)=6334(4)$ MeV, $M(B_c(2S))=6868(4)$ MeV, $M(B_c^*(2S))=6905(4)$ MeV. The mass splittings between $D(2^3S_1)-D(2^1S_0)$, $D_s(2^3S_1)-D_s(2^1S_0)$ are predicted to be $\sim 70$ MeV, which are significantly smaller than in several other studies.Comment: 13 page

Strong coupling constant from bottomonium fine structure

From a fit to the experimental data on the $b\bar{b}$ fine structure, the two-loop coupling constant is extracted. For the 1P state the fitted value is $\alpha_s(\mu_1) = 0.33 \pm 0.01(exp)\pm 0.02 (th)$ at the scale $\mu_1 = 1.8 \pm 0.1$ GeV, which corresponds to the QCD constant $\Lambda^{(4)}(2-loop) = 338 \pm 30$ MeV (n_f = 4) and $\alpha_s(M_Z) = 0.119 \pm 0.002. For the 2P state the value$\alpha_s(\mu_2) = 0.40 \pm 0.02(exp)\pm 0.02(th)$at the scale$\mu_2 = 1.02 \pm 0.2$GeV is extracted, which is significantly larger than in the previous analysis of Fulcher (1991) and Halzen (1993), but about 30smaller than the value given by standard perturbation theory. This value$\alpha_s(1.0) \approx 0.40$can be obtained in the framework of the background perturbation theory, thus demonstrating the freezing of$\alpha_s$. The relativistic corrections to$\alpha_s$ are found to be about 15%.Comment: 18 pages LaTe

The gluonic condensate from the hyperfine splitting Mcog(χcJ)−M(hc)M_{\rm cog}(\chi_{cJ})-M(h_c) in charmonium

The precision measurement of the hyperfine splitting $\Delta_{\rm HF} (1P, c\bar c)=M_{\rm cog} (\chi_{cJ}) - M(h_c) = -0.5 \pm 0.4$ MeV in the Fermilab--E835 experiment allows to determine the gluonic condensate $G_2$ with high accuracy if the gluonic correlation length $T_g$ is fixed. In our calculations the negative value of $\Delta_{\rm HF} = -0.3 \pm 0.4$ MeV is obtained only if the relatively small $T_g = 0.16$ fm and $G_2 = 0.065 (3)$ GeV${}^4$ are taken. These values correspond to the ``physical'' string tension $(\sigma \approx 0.18$ GeV$^2$). For $T_g \ge 0.2$ fm the hyperfine splitting is positive and grows for increasing $T_g$. In particular for $T_g = 0.2$ fm and $G_2 = 0.041 (2)$ GeV${}^4$ the splitting $\Delta_{\rm HF} = 1.4 (2)$ MeV is obtained, which is in accord with the recent CLEO result.Comment: 9 pages revtex 4, no figure

The leptonic widths of high ψ\psi-resonances in unitary coupled-channel model

The leptonic widths of high $\psi$-resonances are calculated in a coupled-channel model with unitary inelasticity, where analytical expressions for mixing angles between (n+1)\,^3S_1 and n\,^3D_1 states and probabilities $Z_i$ of the $c\bar c$ component are derived. Since these factors depend on energy (mass), different values of mixing angles $\theta(\psi(4040))=27.7^\circ$ and $\theta(\psi(4160))=29.5^\circ$, $Z_1\,(\psi(4040))=0.76$, and $Z_2\,(\psi(4160))=0.62$ are obtained. It gives the leptonic widths $\Gamma_{ee}(\psi(4040))=Z_1\, 1.17=0.89$~keV, $\Gamma_{ee}(\psi(4160))=Z_2\, 0.76=0.47$~keV in good agreement with experiment. For $\psi(4415)$ the leptonic width $\Gamma_{ee}(\psi(4415))=~0.55$~keV is calculated, while for the missing resonance $\psi(4510)$ we predict $M(\psi(4500))=(4515\pm 5)$~MeV and $\Gamma_{ee}(\psi(4510)) \cong 0.50$~keV.Comment: 10 pages, 6 references corrected, some new material adde

Higher excitations of the DD and DsD_s mesons

The masses of higher $D(nL)$ and $D_s(nL)$ excitations are shown to decrease due to the string contribution, originating from the rotation of the QCD string itself: it lowers the masses by 45 MeV for $L=2 (n=1)$ and by 65 MeV for $L=3 (n=1)$. An additional decrease $\sim 100$ MeV takes place if the current mass of the light (strange) quark is used in a relativistic model. For $D_s(1\,{}^3D_3)$ and $D_s(2P_1^H)$ the calculated masses agree with the experimental values for $D_s(2860)$ and $D_s(3040)$, and the masses of $D(2\,{}^1S_0)$, $D(2\,{}^3S_1)$, $D(1\,{}^3D_3)$, and $D(1D_2)$ are in agreement with the new BaBar data. For the yet undiscovered resonances we predict the masses $M(D(2\,{}^3P_2))=2965$ MeV, $M(D(2\,{}^3P_0))=2880$ MeV, $M(D(1\,{}^3F_4))=3030$ MeV, and $M(D_s(1\,{}^3F_2))=3090$ MeV. We show that for $L=2,3$ the states with $j_q=l+1/2$ and $j_q=l-1/2$ ($J=l$) are almost completely unmixed ($\phi\simeq -1^\circ$), which implies that the mixing angles $\theta$ between the states with S=1 and S=0 ($J=L$) are $\theta\approx 40^\circ$ for L=2 and $\approx 42^\circ$ for L=3.Comment: 22 pages, no figures, 4 tables Two references and corresponding discussion adde