言語表現に現れるスキャニングの研究

本文データは平成22年度国立国会図書館の学位論文(博士)のデジタル化実施により作成された画像ファイルを基にpdf変換したものである全文ファイル差し替え（2021.07.28）京都大学0048新制・課程博士博士(文学)甲第7097号文博第115号新制||文||297(附属図書館)UT51-98-G26京都大学大学院文学研究科行動文化学(言語学)専攻(主査)教授 吉田 和彦, 教授 宮岡 伯人, 教授 庄垣内 正弘学位規則第4条第1項該当Doctor of LettersKyoto UniversityDFA

日本語のイントネーションとアクセントの関係の多様性

神戸大学Kobe University日本語(共通語)のイントネーションとアクセントは,並列的(copulative)あるいは足し算的(cumulative)な関係にあり,共存すると考えられることが多い。本稿は,非実験室的な発話状況に積極的に目を向けることによって,日本語のイントネーションとアクセントがこれまで考えられているよりも多様な関係に立ち得るということを,3点にわたって示す。第1点,さまざまなイントネーションとアクセントの間には,競合的(conflictive)な関係が認められる。その場合,話し手のきもちに応じて,イントネーションがアクセントを消したり,逆にアクセントがイントネーションを消したりする。第2点,イントネーションとアクセントとの共存は,時には,両者の力の拮抗に基づいた表面的なもので,より根底に両者の競合が見られることもある。若い世代の新しい言い方も,その一端を反映する。第3点,イントネーションはアクセントに対して上記3種の関係の他に,寄生的(parasitic)な関係に立つこともある。It is widely accepted that intonation and accent are either on copulative or cumulative relation in Modern Standard Japanese prosody. On copulative relation, intonation and accent are juxtaposed, as is clearly shown in a question sentence Ame? (Rain?), where the High-Low accent of the word ame (rain) is first realized and then follows the rising intonation. On cumulative relation, intonation and accent are overlaid with each other, as is ascertained by comparing Ame? (Candy?) with Ame. (Candy.): The final part e of the word ame (candy) with Low-High accent is higher in the former question sentence than it is in the latter declarative sentence. This paper shows that the relationship between intonation and accent can be more diverse than it has been thought to be so far, by focusing on natural speech in an everyday conversational environment. More concretely, this paper shows: (i) Intonation and accent can have a conflictive relationship, where they fight each other. The more the speaker is devoted in an attitude connected with an intonation, the more that intonation is likely to expel lexical accents. Conversely, the more the speaker wants to put prominence on a word, the more its accent is likely to resist (and even intercept) intonation; (ii) Some "peaceful" relationships between intonation and accent are actually based on their conflict on a deeper level; (iii) Besides copulative, cumulative, and conflictive relations, intonation can have a parasitic relation to accent. Parasitic intonations are realized only by distorting the normal accent of words

あのー、ひ、非流暢って何ですか？

京都大学アカデミックデイ2023開催日時: 2023年9月24日(日) 11:00-18:00会場: ゼスト御池（京都市役所前地下街）河原町広場、寺町広場、御幸町広場主催: 学術研究展開センター(KURA)，研究推進部研究推進課，「国民との科学・技術対話」ワーキンググループ京都大学の学術研究成果発信の一環として包括的に登

Toward a grammar of interaction : an analysis of Japanese pseudo-evidentials

A considerable number of linguistic studies have been made on image-schema, but little attention has been given to the interaction between the conceptualizer and his/her environment. Throughout an observation of Japanese pseudo-evidentials this paper shows that interaction as well as image-schema has a great influence on language expressions. Interaction enables the speaker to express a state as the conceptualizer's experience in two ways. The first way is to express a state as the conceptualizer's experience of probing the environment. The Japanese sentence "Shisenryoori-niwa, karakunai-nomo tokidoki aru (lit. There are sometimes non-spicy Suchuan dishes), " for example, can convey the meaning that some Suchuan dishes are not spicy unless it is uttered (as a monologue) by a chef of Suchuan dishes. This is because a chef of Suchuan dishes knows too much about Suchuan dishes to express his/her experience of probing the world of Suchuan dishes instead of simply expressing the objective knowledge "Some Suchuan dishes are not spicy". The second way is to express a state as the conceptualizer's somatic reaction to environmental stimuli. Thus the Japanese sentence "Watashi-wa sankai itakatta (lit. I was painful three times)" is more natural than the sentence "Watashi-wa sankai akakatta (lit. I was red three times), " because the cognition of pain is more somatic and primitive than that of color in that the latter needs judgment of color category. Since an experience is a kind of event, interaction allows a state to be expressed as an event, which means that an event does not necessarily have time shift as its factor, distinct from the event models previously suggested