1,316 research outputs found

    Tecnologías, inclusión y desarrollo : reflexiones hacia la ruralidad de Bogotá.

    Get PDF
    En esta obra se presentan algunas reflexiones derivadas del proyecto “La política tecnológica como estrategia para la inclusión y el desarrollo de comunidades rurales”, financiado por la Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios – UNIMINUTO. En dicha propuesta de investigación se planteó un análisis sobre las relaciones entre las políticas de implementación tecnológica del Estado colombiano y las posibilidades de inclusión de comunidades rurales en las lógicas del desarrollo por la vía de la ampliación de la infraestructura digital. Lo anterior habida cuenta de las brechas en términos del acceso a las tecnologías de información y comunicación (TIC) por parte de poblaciones de los sectores rurales periféricos de la ciudad de Bogotá —en particular, la zona de Usme—, además de los discursos que prometen movilizar el desarrollo rural mediante la implementación de tecnologías digitales

    Tecnologías, inclusión y desarrollo : reflexiones hacia la ruralidad de Bogotá.

    Get PDF
    En esta obra se presentan algunas reflexiones derivadas del proyecto “La política tecnológica como estrategia para la inclusión y el desarrollo de comunidades rurales”, financiado por la Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios – UNIMINUTO. En dicha propuesta de investigación se planteó un análisis sobre las relaciones entre las políticas de implementación tecnológica del Estado colombiano y las posibilidades de inclusión de comunidades rurales en las lógicas del desarrollo por la vía de la ampliación de la infraestructura digital. Lo anterior habida cuenta de las brechas en términos del acceso a las tecnologías de información y comunicación (TIC) por parte de poblaciones de los sectores rurales periféricos de la ciudad de Bogotá —en particular, la zona de Usme—, además de los discursos que prometen movilizar el desarrollo rural mediante la implementación de tecnologías digitales

    Sistema d'autenticació one-time password (OTP) per a mòbils

    Get PDF
    Aquest projecte consisteix en fer l'anàlisi, disseny i implementació d'un sistema d'autenticació a través de contrasenyes d'un sol ús (One Time Password -OTP-) per a dispositius mòbils. Per evitar l'ús de contrasenyes estàtiques farem una aplicació per a telèfons mòbils capaç de generar contrasenyes aleatòries gràcies a uns paràmetres previs, així com de poder tenir un registre dels serveis on poden ser utilitzades. Partirem d'un protocol repte/resposta on l'usuari interactuarà amb el seu telèfon mòbil i un ordinador personal amb una connexió a Internet. Podrà registrar-se i, introduint certes dades al mòbil que li proporciona el servidor, podrà fer el procés d'autenticar-se per poder accedir a zones restringides del servei.Este proyecto consiste en hacer el análisis, diseño e implementación de un sistema de autenticación a través de contraseñas de un solo uso (One Time Password -OTP-) para dispositivos móviles. Para evitar el uso de contraseñas estáticas haremos una aplicación para teléfonos móviles capaz de generar contraseñas aleatorias gracias a unos parámetros previos, así como de poder tener un registro de los servicios donde pueden ser utilizadas. Partiremos de un protocolo reto/respuesta donde el usuario interactuará con su teléfono móvil y un ordenador personal con una conexión a Internet. Podrá registrarse e, introduciendo ciertos datos en el móvil que le proporcionará el servidor, podrá hacer el proceso de autenticarse para poder acceder a zonas restringidas del servicio.This Project consists of the analysis, design and implementation of a One Time Password system for mobile devices. To avoid the use of static passwords, we will develop a mobile phone application capable of generating random passwords from previous parameters, and storing a register containing the services where they might be used. We will start from a challenge/response protocol. The user will interact through his mobile phone and a personal computer connected to the Internet. He will be able to register and, introducing certain data given from the server in his cell phone, he might authenticate himself to access the service's restricted zones

    La Ricarda : continuidad y uso social del patrimonio rural del Prat de Llobregat

    Get PDF
    La casa de la Ricarda, obra arquitectónica de la década de 1950 realizada por Antonio Bonet, es considerada un referente internacional del racionalismo. Sin embargo, su localización cercana al aeropuerto del Prat impide que la familia Gomis-Bertrand pueda vivir en ella. Sus reivindicaciones de ayudas por parte del Ayuntamiento para proteger y cuidar la casa, así como sus deseos de acercarla a la población del Prat, sirven de inicio de este trabajo de investigación en el que, a través de la etnografía y las entrevistas, se realiza un diagnóstico de la situación actual de la casa, constatando su desconexión con los habitantes del Prat y con su entorno en general. En este sentido se propone una serie de medidas para la activación de la casa como patrimonio cultural que tratan de poner en valor sus potenciales usos sociales.La Ricarda, an architectural ensemble made in the 50s by Antonio Bonet, is considered to be an international referent of the rationalist trend. Nevertheless, its location near to the Prat airport prevents the Gomis-Bertrand family from living there. Their claim for aids from the local government to protect and take care of their house, added to their wishes to bring the house closer to the population of Prat initiate this investigation, in which, through an ethnographic work and interviews, a diagnosis of the actual situation of the house is made, confirming its disconnection with the inhabitants of Prat and its environment. Thus, several actions are proposed in order to activate the house as a cultural heritage by trying to value its potentials social uses

    Phase I, multicenter, open-label study of intravenous VCN-01 oncolytic adenovirus with or without nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

    Get PDF
    Background VCN-01 is an oncolytic adenovirus (Ad5 based) designed to replicate in cancer cells with dysfunctional RB1 pathway, express hyaluronidase to enhance virus intratumoral spread and facilitate chemotherapy and immune cells extravasation into the tumor. This phase I clinical trial was aimed to find the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the intravenous delivery of the replication-competent VCN-01 adenovirus in patients with advanced cancer. Methods Part I: patients with advanced refractory solid tumors received one single dose of VCN-01. Parts II and III: patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma received VCN-01 (only in cycle 1) and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (VCN-concurrent on day 1 in Part II, and 7days before chemotherapy in Part III). Patients were required to have anti-Ad5 neutralizing antibody (NAbs) titers lower than 1/350 dilution. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed. Results 26% of the patients initially screened were excluded based on high NAbs levels. Sixteen and 12 patients were enrolled in Part I and II, respectively: RP2D were 1 x10(13) viral particles (vp)/patient (Part I), and 3.3x10(12) vp/patient (Part II). Fourteen patients were included in Part Ill: there were no DLTs and the RP2D was 1 x10(13) vp/patient. Observed DLTs were grade 4 aspartate aminotransferase increase in one patient (Part I, 1x10(13) vp), grade 4 febrile neutropenia in one patient and grade 5 thrombocytopenia plus enterocolitis in another patient (Part II, 1 x10(13) vp). In patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma overall response rate were 50% (Part II) and 50% (Part III). VCN-01 viral genomes were detected in tumor tissue in five out of six biopsies (day 8). A second viral plasmatic peak and increased hyaluronidase serum levels suggested replication after intravenous injection in all patients. Increased levels of immune biomarkers (interferon- r,soluble lymphocyte activation ne-3, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10) were found after VCN-01 administration. Conclusions Treatment with VCN-01 is feasible and has an acceptable safety. Encouraging biological and clinical activity was observed when administered in combination with nab-paditaxel plus gemcitabine to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

    Growth Hormone Improves Growth Retardation Induced by Rapamycin without Blocking Its Antiproliferative and Antiangiogenic Effects on Rat Growth Plate

    Get PDF
    Rapamycin, an immunosuppressant agent used in renal transplantation with antitumoral properties, has been reported to impair longitudinal growth in young individuals. As growth hormone (GH) can be used to treat growth retardation in transplanted children, we aimed this study to find out the effect of GH therapy in a model of young rat with growth retardation induced by rapamycin administration. Three groups of 4-week-old rats treated with vehicle (C), daily injections of rapamycin alone (RAPA) or in combination with GH (RGH) at pharmacological doses for 1 week were compared. GH treatment caused a 20% increase in both growth velocity and body length in RGH animals when compared with RAPA group. GH treatment did not increase circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor I, a systemic mediator of GH actions. Instead, GH promoted the maturation and hypertrophy of growth plate chondrocytes, an effect likely related to AKT and ERK1/2 mediated inactivation of GSK3β, increase of glycogen deposits and stabilization of β-catenin. Interestingly, GH did not interfere with the antiproliferative and antiangiogenic activities of rapamycin in the growth plate and did not cause changes in chondrocyte autophagy markers. In summary, these findings indicate that GH administration improves longitudinal growth in rapamycin-treated rats by specifically acting on the process of growth plate chondrocyte hypertrophy but not by counteracting the effects of rapamycin on proliferation and angiogenesis

    From magma source to volcanic sink under Tagoro Volcano (El hierro, Canary Islands): Petrologic, Geochemical and Physiographic Evolution of the 2011-2012 Submarine Eruption

    Get PDF
    Active volcanoes are key laboratories to carry out detailed research -and monitoring- about the history of magmas before, during and after eruptions. Tagoro, the submarine active vol- cano at El Hierro Island (Canary archipelago), is a highly favorable case to assess and monitor its daily ongoing behaviour, as well as to study the links between the processes of magma genesis occurring at depth and their derived eruptive events at the surface. In this interdisciplinary research we combine new results of classical petrology (petrography, geochemistry, and thermodynamics) on the volcanic products expelled by Tagoro during the 2011–2012 eruption, with a high- resolution (5 m grid) bathymetry model car- ried out during 2017, and recent data from magnetometry, to refine the current knowl- edge of this eruption. Our results mainly reveal (i) slight magma differentiation and mixing processes at c. 12 km depth during a continuous eruptive pulse; (ii) a similar mag- matic evolution and residence times at depth between previous and 2011–2012 eruptions on the island; (iii) an insignificant interaction of external fluids with the magma at depth or within the ascent conduit; (iv) a present-day magnetometric anomaly under the Tagoro’s area; (v) a minimum volume estimate for the magma withdrawn from the plumbing system at depth.MINECO and FEDER: VULCANO I (CTM2012-36317). Instituto Español de Oceanografía.VULCANA (Vulcana IEO-2015-2017). Instituto Español de OceanografíaMINECO AND MEC. EXPLORA-CIENCIA (CGL2014—61775-EXP)MINECO AND MEC. EXPLORA-CIENCIA (CAS14-00189; MEC)Programa Propio mod. 1B— 2019 (USAL)EC Grant EVE (DG ECHO H2020 826292)PhD grant “Programa Propio III Universidad de Salamanca, cofounded by Banco de Santander”The PTI VOLCAN research initiatives.Peer reviewe

    Prevalence of personality disorders in college students of Medellin

    Get PDF
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of personality disorders in university students in Medellín, Colombia. The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory II (MCMI-II) (Millon, 1987a) was applied to 1907 students from six universities. The mean age was 22 years old, and the age range was between 16 and 63 years old. A database was built containing the following information: socio-demographic variables, direct scores and standardized scores for each disorder, and a new variable, called “cut-off point”, was established, which categorized the “presence” or “absence” of the disorders. A descriptive analysis was carried out to determine the disorders´ prevalence and the outcome, going from the strongest to the weakest, was: Borderline Personality Disorder, Passive-Aggressive Personality Disorder, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Narcissist Personality Disorder, Schizotypal Personality Disorder, Paranoid Personality Disorder, Aggressive-Sadistic Personality Disorder, Avoidant Personality Disorder, Self-Destructive Personality Disorder, Histrionic Personality Disorder, Dependent Personality Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder and Schizoid Personality Disorder.RESUMEN: El propósito del estudio fue establecer la prevalencia de los trastornos de personalidad en estudiantes universitarios de Medellín, Colombia. Se aplicó el Inventario Clínico Multiaxial de Millon (MCMI-II) (Millon, 1987a) a 1907 estudiantes universitarios de seis universidades. La edad media fue 22 años, y el rango estuvo entre 16 y 63 años. Se construyó una base de datos con la siguiente información: variables sociodemográficas, puntuaciones directas y puntuaciones de tabla base de cada trastorno, y se estableció una nueva variable denominada “punto de corte”, que categorizó la “presencia” o “ausencia” de los trastornos. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo para determinar su prevalencia que, de mayor a menor, fue: límite, pasivo-agresivo, antisocial, narcisista, esquizotípico, paranoide, agresivo-sádico, evitativo, autodestructivo, histriónico, dependiente, obsesivo-compulsivo y esquizoide

    Docencia en Derecho y Proceso: hacia un aprendizaje de calidad en la Universidad

    Get PDF
    Presentación / Esther Pillado González (pp. 11-13). -- La adaptación de la asignatura derecho procesal penal al grado en la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid: un proceso aún inconcluso / Juan Manuel Alcoceba Gil (pp. 17-26). -- Role playing, cooperación competitiva y method case en la docencia-aprendizaje del Derecho Procesal / Cristina Alonso Salgado (pp. 27-35). -- Esquemas y materiales básicos para explicar en el grado en derecho el sistema de impugnación de actos jurídicos de las administraciones públicas en España / Roberto O. Bustillo Bolado (pp. 37-40). -- Nuevas herramientas y técnicas para la docencia del derecho / Juan Cámara Ruiz (pp. 41-51). -- Novas técnicas na docência em direito / Marco Carvalho Gonçalves (pp. 53-60). -- Experiência de lecionação em Direito em cursos não jurídicos – a lecionação da UC de Direito das Crianças e Jovens ao Mestrado em Intervenção Psicossocial com Crianças, Jovens e Famílias do Instituto de Educação / Cristina M. A. Dias (pp. 61-67). -- Los programas universitarios para mayores: la docencia en Derecho en la Universidad de Vigo / Teresa Estévez Abeleira (pp. 69-79). -- El aprendizaje activo del Derecho Procesal / María Dolores Fernández Fustes (81-92). -- El aprendizaje como método de adquirir los conocimientos / Raquel López Jiménez (pp. 93-101). -- Alumnado con necesidades especiales en el grado en derecho: el reto de la normalización e inclusión / Ángel M. Mariño de Andrés y M. Teresa Martínez Táboas (pp. 103-110). -- Docencia y proceso penal: intentando experimentar el proceso / Sabela Oubiña Barbolla (pp. 111-127). -- La integración de las redes sociales en la enseñanza del Derecho Penal / Natalia Pérez Rivas (pp. 129-135). -- Análisis y prospectiva de una plataforma e-learning en ciencias jurídicas / Amparo Rodríguez Damián, Margarita Pino Juste, Arturo Casar Sarasola y Manuel Pérez Cota (pp. 137-149). -- La evaluación de competencias en las materias “prácticas externas” del Máster Universitario en Abogacía: problemas y retos / Mónica Siota Álvarez (pp. 151-164). -- La enseñanza del derecho procesal a través del método del caso / Helena Soleto Muñoz (pp. 165-178). -- A aprendizagem activa do Direito Processual – reflexão sobre velhos hábitos e novas práticas / Lurdes Varregoso Mesquita (pp. 179-189). -- Acão executiva e metodologia aplicada – demonstração de caso / Lurdes Varregoso Mesquita, Diana Leiras (pp. 191-201). -- Derecho Constitucional y género / Almudena Bergareche Gros (pp. 205-216). -- Aproximación al fenómeno de la violencia de género a través de las novelas como recurso didáctico / María Castro Corredoira (pp. 217-227). -- La formación en género en derecho penal: el cine como recurso didáctico / Natalia Pérez Rivas, Fernando Vázquez-Portomeñe Seijas (pp. 229-240). -- Cuestiones controvertidas de la docencia en el ámbito del derecho constitucional: la perspectiva de género y el principio de transversalidad / Pablo Riquelme Vázquez (pp. 241-253). -- Storytelling y cine extranjero en la explicación del sistema de justicia penal español / Cristina Alonso Salgado (pp. 257-263). -- Direito e Cinema. Breve reflexão a partir da experiência da docência ao 1.º ano do curso de Direito / Maria Clara Calheiros (pp. 265-273). -- El cine como opción pedagógica en la enseñanza del derecho penal / Fernando Vázquez-Portomeñe Seijas y María Castro Corredoira (pp. 275-286). -- El jurista del siglo XXI y la Universidad del siglo pasado: ¿realidades irreconciliables? / Amaya Arnáiz Serrano (pp. 289-307). -- La formación del abogado del siglo XXI / Emiliano Carretero Morales (pp. 309-321). -- El cambio del perfil del alumno y su influencia a la enseñanza superior / Anna Fiodorova (pp. 323-335). -- La enseñanza del derecho en el marco Bolonia: reflexiones en base a las distintas tradiciones jurídicas / Mercedes Llorente Sánchez-Arjona (pp. 337-355)

    Common non-synonymous SNPs associated with breast cancer susceptibility: findings from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.

    Get PDF
    Candidate variant association studies have been largely unsuccessful in identifying common breast cancer susceptibility variants, although most studies have been underpowered to detect associations of a realistic magnitude. We assessed 41 common non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) for which evidence of association with breast cancer risk had been previously reported. Case-control data were combined from 38 studies of white European women (46 450 cases and 42 600 controls) and analyzed using unconditional logistic regression. Strong evidence of association was observed for three nsSNPs: ATXN7-K264R at 3p21 [rs1053338, per allele OR = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-1.10, P = 2.9 × 10(-6)], AKAP9-M463I at 7q21 (rs6964587, OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.03-1.07, P = 1.7 × 10(-6)) and NEK10-L513S at 3p24 (rs10510592, OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.07-1.12, P = 5.1 × 10(-17)). The first two associations reached genome-wide statistical significance in a combined analysis of available data, including independent data from nine genome-wide association studies (GWASs): for ATXN7-K264R, OR = 1.07 (95% CI = 1.05-1.10, P = 1.0 × 10(-8)); for AKAP9-M463I, OR = 1.05 (95% CI = 1.04-1.07, P = 2.0 × 10(-10)). Further analysis of other common variants in these two regions suggested that intronic SNPs nearby are more strongly associated with disease risk. We have thus identified a novel susceptibility locus at 3p21, and confirmed previous suggestive evidence that rs6964587 at 7q21 is associated with risk. The third locus, rs10510592, is located in an established breast cancer susceptibility region; the association was substantially attenuated after adjustment for the known GWAS hit. Thus, each of the associated nsSNPs is likely to be a marker for another, non-coding, variant causally related to breast cancer risk. Further fine-mapping and functional studies are required to identify the underlying risk-modifying variants and the genes through which they act.BCAC is funded by Cancer Research UK (C1287/A10118, C1287/A12014) and by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement n8 223175 (HEALTH-F2–2009-223175) (COGS). Meetings of the BCAC have been funded by the European Union COST programme (BM0606). Genotyping of the iCOGS array was funded by the European Union (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175), Cancer Research UK (C1287/A10710), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the ‘CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer’ program and the Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation and Export Trade of Quebec (PSR-SIIRI-701). Additional support for the iCOGS infrastructure was provided by the National Institutes of Health (CA128978) and Post-Cancer GWAS initiative (1U19 CA148537, 1U19 CA148065 and 1U19 CA148112—the GAME-ON initiative), the Department of Defence (W81XWH-10-1-0341), Komen Foundation for the Cure, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund. The ABCFS and OFBCR work was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute (USA). The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or any of the collaborating centers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement t by the US Government or the BCFR. The ABCFS was also supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the New South Wales Cancer Council, the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (Australia) and the Victorian Breast Cancer Research Consortium. J.L.H. is a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Senior Principal Research Fellow and M.C.S. is a NHMRC Senior Research Fellow. The OFBCR work was also supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research ‘CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer’ program. The ABCS was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society Grant no. NKI2007-3839 and NKI2009-4363. The ACP study is funded by the Breast Cancer Research Trust, UK. The work of the BBCC was partly funded by ELAN-Programme of the University Hospital of Erlangen. The BBCS is funded by Cancer Research UK and Breakthrough Breast Cancer and acknowledges NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, and the National Cancer Research Network (NCRN). E.S. is supported by NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Guy’s & St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King’s College London, UK. Core funding to the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics was provided by the Wellcome Trust (090532/Z/09/Z). I.T. is supported by the Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. The BSUCH study was supported by the Dietmar-Hopp Foundation, the Helmholtz Society and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). The CECILE study was funded by the Fondation de France, the French National Institute of Cancer (INCa), The National League against Cancer, the National Agency for Environmental l and Occupational Health and Food Safety (ANSES), the National Agency for Research (ANR), and the Association for Research against Cancer (ARC). The CGPS was supported by the Chief Physician Johan Boserup and Lise Boserup Fund, the Danish Medical Research Council and Herlev Hospital.The CNIO-BCS was supported by the Genome Spain Foundation the Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cáncer and grants from the Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer and the Fondo de Investigación Sanitario PI11/00923 and PI081120). The Human Genotyping-CEGEN Unit, CNIO is supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. D.A. was supported by a Fellowship from the Michael Manzella Foundation (MMF) and was a participant in the CNIO Summer Training Program. The CTS was initially supported by the California Breast Cancer Act of 1993 and the California Breast Cancer Research Fund (contract 97-10500) and is currently funded through the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA77398). Collection of cancer incidence e data was supported by the California Department of Public Health as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885. HAC receives support from the Lon V Smith Foundation (LVS39420). The ESTHER study was supported by a grant from the Baden Württemberg Ministry of Science, Research and Arts. Additional cases were recruited in the context of the VERDI study, which was supported by a grant from the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe). The GENICA was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany grants 01KW9975/5, 01KW9976/8, 01KW9977/0 and 01KW0114, the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), as well as the Department of Internal Medicine , Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus Bonn, Germany. The HEBCS was supported by the Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Fund, Academy of Finland (132473), the Finnish Cancer Society, The Nordic Cancer Union and the Sigrid Juselius Foundation. The HERPACC was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology of Japan, by a Grant-in-Aid for the Third Term Comprehensive 10-Year strategy for Cancer Control from Ministry Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, by a research grant from Takeda Science Foundation , by Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants for Research on Applying Health Technology from Ministry Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan and by National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund. The HMBCS was supported by short-term fellowships from the German Academic Exchange Program (to N.B), and the Friends of Hannover Medical School (to N.B.). Financial support for KARBAC was provided through the regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet, the Stockholm Cancer Foundation and the Swedish Cancer Society. The KBCP was financially supported by the special Government Funding (EVO) of Kuopio University Hospital grants, Cancer Fund of North Savo, the Finnish Cancer Organizations, the Academy of Finland and by the strategic funding of the University of Eastern Finland. kConFab is supported by grants from the National Breast Cancer Foundation , the NHMRC, the Queensland Cancer Fund, the Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia and the Cancer Foundation of Western Australia. The kConFab Clinical Follow Up Study was funded by the NHMRC (145684, 288704, 454508). Financial support for the AOCS was provided by the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (DAMD17-01-1-0729), the Cancer Council of Tasmania and Cancer Foundation of Western Australia and the NHMRC (199600). G.C.T. and P.W. are supported by the NHMRC. LAABC is supported by grants (1RB-0287, 3PB-0102, 5PB-0018 and 10PB-0098) from the California Breast Cancer Research Program. Incident breast cancer cases were collected by the USC Cancer Surveillance Program (CSP) which is supported under subcontract by the California Department of Health. The CSP is also part of the National Cancer Institute’s Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, under contract number N01CN25403. LMBC is supported by the ‘Stichting tegen Kanker’ (232-2008 and 196-2010). The MARIE study was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V. (70-2892-BR I), the Federal Ministry of Education Research (BMBF) Germany (01KH0402), the Hamburg Cancer Society and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). MBCSG is supported by grants from the Italian Association ciation for Cancer Research (AIRC) and by funds from the Italian citizens who allocated a 5/1000 share of their tax payment in support of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, according to Italian laws (INT-Institutional strategic projects ‘5 × 1000’). The MCBCS was supported by the NIH grants (CA122340, CA128978) and a Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (CA116201), the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and a generous gift from the David F. and Margaret T. Grohne Family Foundation and the Ting Tsung and Wei Fong Chao Foundation. MCCS cohort recruitment was funded by VicHealth and Cancer Council Victoria. The MCCS was further supported by Australian NHMRC grants 209057, 251553 and 504711 and by infrastructure provided by Cancer Council Victoria. The MEC was supported by NIH grants CA63464, CA54281, CA098758 and CA132839. The work of MTLGEBCS was supported by the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant CRN-87521) and the Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation and Export Trade (grant PSR-SIIRI-701). MYBRCA is funded by research grants from the Malaysian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education (UM.C/HlR/MOHE/06) and Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation (CARIF). Additional controls were recruited by the Singapore Eye Research Institute, which was supported by a grant from the Biomedical Research Council (BMRC08/1/35/19,tel:08/1/35/19./550), Singapore and the National medical Research Council, Singapore (NMRC/CG/SERI/2010). The NBCS was supported by grants from the Norwegian Research council (155218/V40, 175240/S10 to A.L.B.D., FUGE-NFR 181600/ V11 to V.N.K. and a Swizz Bridge Award to A.L.B.D.). The NBHS was supported by NIH grant R01CA100374. Biological sample preparation was conducted the Survey and Biospecimen Shared Resource, which is supported by P30 CA68485. The OBCS was supported by research grants from the Finnish Cancer Foundation, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Academy of Finland, the University of Oulu, and the Oulu University Hospital. The ORIGO study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (RUL 1997-1505) and the Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI-NLCP16). The PBCS was funded by Intramural Research Funds of the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, USA. pKARMA is a combination of the KARMA and LIBRO-1 studies. KARMA was supported by Ma¨rit and Hans Rausings Initiative Against Breast Cancer. KARMA and LIBRO-1 were supported the Cancer Risk Prediction Center (CRisP; www.crispcenter.org), a Linnaeus Centre (Contract ID 70867902) financed by the Swedish Research Council. The RBCS was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (DDHK 2004-3124, DDHK 2009-4318). SASBAC was supported by funding from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore (A∗STAR), the US National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation KC was financed by the Swedish Cancer Society (5128-B07-01PAF). The SBCGS was supported primarily by NIH grants R01CA64277, R01CA148667, and R37CA70867. Biological sample preparation was conducted the Survey and Biospecimen Shared Resource, which is supported by P30 CA68485. The SBCS was supported by Yorkshire Cancer Research S305PA, S299 and S295. Funding for the SCCS was provided by NIH grant R01 CA092447. The Arkansas Central Cancer Registry is fully funded by a grant from National Program of Cancer Registries, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Data on SCCS cancer cases from Mississippi were collected by the Mississippi Cancer Registry which participates in the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC or the Mississippi Cancer Registry. SEARCH is funded by a programme grant from Cancer Research UK (C490/A10124) and supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University of Cambridge. The SEBCS was supported by the BRL (Basic Research Laboratory) program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012-0000347). SGBCC is funded by the National Medical Research Council Start-up Grant and Centre Grant (NMRC/CG/NCIS /2010). The recruitment of controls by the Singapore Consortium of Cohort Studies-Multi-ethnic cohort (SCCS-MEC) was funded by the Biomedical Research Council (grant number: 05/1/21/19/425). SKKDKFZS is supported by the DKFZ. The SZBCS was supported by Grant PBZ_KBN_122/P05/2004. K. J. is a fellow of International PhD program, Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Warsaw Medical University, supported by the Polish Foundation of Science. The TNBCC was supported by the NIH grant (CA128978), the Breast Cancer Research Foundation , Komen Foundation for the Cure, the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, the Stefanie Spielman Fund for Breast Cancer Research and a generous gift from the David F. and Margaret T. Grohne Family Foundation and the Ting Tsung and Wei Fong Chao Foundation. Part of the TNBCC (DEMOKRITOS) has been co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund – ESF) and Greek National Funds through the Operational Program ‘Education and Life-long Learning’ of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)—Research Funding Program of the General Secretariat for Research & Technology: ARISTEIA. The TWBCS is supported by the Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica and the National Science Council, Taiwan. The UKBGS is funded by Breakthrough Breast Cancer and the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR). ICR acknowledges NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the Wellcome Trust.This is the advanced access published version distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 2.0, which can also be viewed on the publisher's webstie at: http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/07/04/hmg.ddu311.full.pdf+htm
    corecore