Laconic Function Evaluation for Turing Machines

Laconic function evaluation (LFE) allows Alice to compress a large circuit $\mathbf{C}$ into a small digest $\mathsf{d}$. Given Alice\u27s digest, Bob can encrypt some input $x$ under $\mathsf{d}$ in a way that enables Alice to recover $\mathbf{C}(x)$, without learning anything beyond that. The scheme is said to be $laconic$ if the size of $\mathsf{d}$, the runtime of the encryption algorithm, and the size of the ciphertext are all sublinear in the size of $\mathbf{C}$. Until now, all known LFE constructions have ciphertexts whose size depends on the $depth$ of the circuit $\mathbf{C}$, akin to the limitation of $levelled$ homomorphic encryption. In this work we close this gap and present the first LFE scheme (for Turing machines) with asymptotically optimal parameters. Our scheme assumes the existence of indistinguishability obfuscation and somewhere statistically binding hash functions. As further contributions, we show how our scheme enables a wide range of new applications, including two previously unknown constructions: • Non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) proofs with optimal prover complexity. • Witness encryption and attribute-based encryption (ABE) for Turing machines from falsifiable assumptions

3-Message Zero Knowledge Against Human Ignorance

The notion of Zero Knowledge has driven the field of cryptography since its conception over thirty years ago. It is well established that two-message zero-knowledge protocols for NP do not exist, and that four-message zero-knowledge arguments exist under the minimal assumption of one-way functions. Resolving the precise round complexity of zero-knowledge has been an outstanding open problem for far too long. In this work, we present a three-message zero-knowledge argument system with soundness against uniform polynomial-time cheating provers. The main component in our construction is the recent delegation protocol for RAM computations (Kalai and Paneth, TCC 2016B and Brakerski, Holmgren and Kalai, ePrint 2016). Concretely, we rely on a three-message variant of their protocol based on a key-less collision-resistant hash functions secure against uniform adversaries as well as other standard primitives. More generally, beyond uniform provers, our protocol provides a natural and meaningful security guarantee against real-world adversaries, which we formalize following Rogaway’s “human-ignorance” approach (VIETCRYPT 2006): in a nutshell, we give an explicit uniform reduction from any adversary breaking the soundness of our protocol to finding collisions in the underlying hash function.National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Award CNS-1350619)National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Award CNS-1413964

Geppetto: Versatile Verifiable Computation

Cloud computing sparked interest in Verifiable Computation protocols, which allow a weak client to securely outsource computations to remote parties. Recent work has dramatically reduced the client’s cost to verify the correctness of results, but the overhead to produce proofs largely remains impractical. Geppetto introduces complementary techniques for reducing prover overhead and increasing prover flexibility. With Multi-QAPs, Geppetto reduces the cost of sharing state between computations (e.g., for MapReduce) or within a single computation by up to two orders of magnitude. Via a careful instantiation of cryptographic primitives, Geppetto also brings down the cost of verifying outsourced cryptographic computations (e.g., verifiably computing on signed data); together with Geppetto’s notion of bounded proof bootstrapping, Geppetto improves on prior bootstrapped systems by five orders of magnitude, albeit at some cost in universality. Geppetto also supports qualitatively new properties like verifying the correct execution of proprietary (i.e., secret) algorithms. Finally, Geppetto’s use of energy-saving circuits brings the prover’s costs more in line with the program’s actual (rather than worst-case) execution time. Geppetto is implemented in a full-fledged, scalable compiler that consumes LLVM code generated from a variety of apps, as well as a large cryptographic library

Toward practical argument systems for verifiable computation

textHow can a client extract useful work from a server without trusting it to compute correctly? A modern motivation for this classic question is third party computing models in which customers outsource their computations to service providers (as in cloud computing). In principle, deep results in complexity theory and cryptography imply that it is possible to verify that an untrusted entity executed a computation correctly. For instance, the server can employ probabilistically checkable proofs (PCPs) in conjunction with cryptographic commitments to generate a succinct proof of correct execution, which the client can efficiently check. However, these theoretical solutions are impractical: they require thousands of CPU years to verifiably execute even simple computations. This dissertation describes the design, implementation, and experimental evaluation viiiof a system, called Pepper, that brings this theory into the realm of plausibility. Pepper incorporates a series of algorithmic improvements and systems engineering techniques to improve performance by over 20 orders of magnitude, relative to an implementation of the theory without our refinements. These include a new probabilistically checkable proof encoding with nearly optimal asymptotics, a concise representation for computations, a more efficient cryptographic commitment primitive, and a distributed implementation of the server with GPU acceleration to reduce latency. Additionally, Pepper extends the verification machinery to handle realistic applications of third party computing: those that interact with remote storage or state (e.g., MapReduce jobs, database queries). To do so, Pepper composes techniques from untrusted storage with the aforementioned technical machinery to verifiably offload both computations and state. Furthermore, to make it easy to use this technology, Pepper includes a compiler to automatically transform programs in a subset of C into executables that run verifiably. One of the chief limitations of Pepper is that verifiable execution is still orders of magnitude slower than an unverifiable native execution. Nonetheless, Pepper takes powerful results from complexity theory and verifiable computation a few steps closer to practicalityComputer Science

Function-specific schemes for verifiable computation

An integral component of modern computing is the ability to outsource data and computation to powerful remote servers, for instance, in the context of cloud computing or remote file storage. While participants can benefit from this interaction, a fundamental security issue that arises is that of integrity of computation: How can the end-user be certain that the result of a computation over the outsourced data has not been tampered with (not even by a compromised or adversarial server)? Cryptographic schemes for verifiable computation address this problem by accompanying each result with a proof that can be used to check the correctness of the performed computation. Recent advances in the field have led to the first implementations of schemes that can verify arbitrary computations. However, in practice the overhead of these general-purpose constructions remains prohibitive for most applications, with proof computation times (at the server) in the order of minutes or even hours for real-world problem instances. A different approach for designing such schemes targets specific types of computation and builds custom-made protocols, sacrificing generality for efficiency. An important representative of this function-specific approach is an authenticated data structure (ADS), where a specialized protocol is designed that supports query types associated with a particular outsourced dataset. This thesis presents three novel ADS constructions for the important query types of set operations, multi-dimensional range search, and pattern matching, and proves their security under cryptographic assumptions over bilinear groups. The scheme for set operations can support nested queries (e.g., two unions followed by an intersection of the results), extending previous works that only accommodate a single operation. The range search ADS provides an exponential (in the number of attributes in the dataset) asymptotic improvement from previous schemes for storage and computation costs. Finally, the pattern matching ADS supports text pattern and XML path queries with minimal cost, e.g., the overhead at the server is less than 4% compared to simply computing the result, for all our tested settings. The experimental evaluation of all three constructions shows significant improvements in proof-computation time over general-purpose schemes

Token Based Authentication and Authorization with Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Enhancing Web API Security and Privacy

This design science study showcases an innovative artifact that utilizes Zero-Knowledge Proofs for API Authentication and Authorization. A comprehensive examination of existing literature and technology is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of this alternative approach. The study reveals that existing APIs are using slower techniques that don’t scale, can’t take advantage of newer hardware, and have been unable to adequately address current security issues. In contrast, the novel technique presented in this study performs better, is more resilient in privacy sensitive and security settings, and is easy to implement and deploy. Additionally, this study identifies potential avenues for further research that could help advance the field of Web API development in terms of security, privacy, and simplicity